<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>iso — LowEndSpirit</title>
        <link>https://lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>iso — LowEndSpirit</description>
    <atom:link href="https://lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/discussions/tagged/iso/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>Looking for KVM VPS Providers Who Support .iso Installer Mounts and Console Access</title>
        <link>https://lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/discussion/6086/looking-for-kvm-vps-providers-who-support-iso-installer-mounts-and-console-access</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 10:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Requests</category>
        <dc:creator>xleet</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6086@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>I am looking for KVM VPS providers who will mount a downloaded .iso installer for Linux upon user request. I am interested in the control panel user interfaces for their users. I know that it seems unusual, but I want to see how they mount and boot Linux .iso image files and provide console access for the Linux installers on them, etc.</p>

<p>Many providers use SolusVM 1. I have seen and used Racknerd's control panel and used their ticket system to request an .iso mount. My experience with KVM and .iso mounts is limited, and I assume that Racknerd's implementation is essentially "standard". My feeling is that all providers with SolusVM 1 have the same look and feel, or only minor differences.</p>

<p>-&gt; So, <em><strong>can you recommend providers who support KVM, custom .iso mounts, and console access</strong></em>? The console would interface with the booted .iso on the KVM VPS with an unformatted drive. In addition, <em><strong>they must also have a user interface other than SolusVM 1</strong></em>, either a competitor or a custom control panel.</p>

<p>I want to be sure that instructions I may write can be easily applied in a generic way to most providers with those features. Does that answer the "why"?</p>
]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
