<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>zfs — LowEndSpirit</title>
        <link>https://lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>zfs — LowEndSpirit</description>
    <atom:link href="https://lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/discussions/tagged/zfs/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>ZFS RAID10 + cache?</title>
        <link>https://lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/discussion/9342/zfs-raid10-cache</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 21:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Help</category>
        <dc:creator>imok</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">9342@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>I've just installed a Proxmox node and I have 4x SSDs + 1 NVMe</p>

<p>I've set up the SSDs with ZFS RAID10 and I'm not really sure what to do with the NVMe.</p>

<p>IA says "It can be used as a ZFS cache (L2ARC) if you are going to work with ZFS."</p>

<p>In your experience, will that ZFS cache make things faster? I have 128GB RAM BTW.</p>
]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Cheapest storage ($0.5 - ) $2.5 / TB / Month</title>
        <link>https://lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/discussion/8904/cheapest-storage-0-5-2-5-tb-month</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 05:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Help</category>
        <dc:creator>archivist</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">8904@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Hetzner "storage box" 1TB  5TB  10TB  20TB</li>
<li>Backblaze personal backup (unlimited. Price per machine)</li>
</ul>

<p>Cheapest &amp; Future (Decentralized)</p>

<ul>
<li>Filecoin &amp; IPFS (SIA, Storj,...)

<ul>
<li><em>some latency, not designed for small files / databases</em></li>
<li><em>might comes with 3 country locations by default / always</em></li>
</ul></li>
</ul>

<p>More:</p>

<ul>
<li>OVH  kimsufi 4 x 2TB (not very convenient &amp; only when on sale) - but you can set you can set ZFS deduplication and compression</li>
<li>Rare Hetzner auctions with clunky things like 15 x 6TB</li>
</ul>

<p>Small companies:</p>

<ul>
<li>Servarica ZFS</li>
</ul>

<p>New:</p>

<ul>
<li>bulkvm (since june) (testing, but unfortunately didnt answer me anymore and why not just a little more ram?)</li>
</ul>

<p>Gone:</p>

<ul>
<li>Google drive unlimited</li>
</ul>

<hr />

<p><a href="https://lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/profile/servarica_hani" rel="nofollow">@servarica_hani</a>  can you give me any coupon or custom offer  &lt;= $2 / TB of secure storage? (under NDA if you will) - When you sell ZFS double paritiy, what host systems are that? Can i get triple parity too?  And will the zfs pool span a big server, so that customers profit from deduplication?<br />
( <a href="https://lowendbox.com/blog/got-burned-on-crypto-invest-in-a-servarica-cheap-vps-your-storage-grows-every-day/" rel="nofollow">https://lowendbox.com/blog/got-burned-on-crypto-invest-in-a-servarica-cheap-vps-your-storage-grows-every-day/</a> by <a href="https://lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/profile/raindog308" rel="nofollow">@raindog308</a> )</p>

<p>I watch your dynamic offers including some RAM and SSD but then it gets much more expensive.<br />
Currently i only use ~10 TB of HDD storage + backup and only ~5 mbit average.</p>

<hr />

<ol start="2">
<li>Harddrives are mostly only for backups and log data, while for sorting &amp; refining data, of course one needs SSD &amp; RAM sometimes (and some always, for caching and ZFS). - Yet I still work only on 64GB DDR4 (as avaiable for $5 from OVH at times. No SSD. And 100ms latency to my storage...)<br />
QUESTION OF THE DAY:<br />
WHY IS THERE NO COMPETITIVE SSD HOST?<br />
The SSD hosting prices are crazy by now,  when actually buying SSD servers starts around $20/TB. (a 2020 Server with 24 x 8 TB NVMe, might costs $4000 and power consumption of SSDs is minimal. So despite the performance the prices are similar to HDD now.  SSD can be even cheaper considering wear down, electricity and no hardware failures. (The 95th quantile of load or write speed could be limited therefore for low budget plans (almost nobody will constantly use the crazy high speed)  - Yet as of now, my non-profit projects still can't afford hosted SSDs (like commerce can usually) (but my project are held back to HDD speeds, as if it was 20 or  30 years ago. <br />
So of course i  wonder to buy an SSD server, but why would i really have to? isn't that strange? Why does Nobodies offers such machine for an acceptable rent?</li>
</ol>

<ul>
<li>Contabo gives 2400GB storage VPS "SSD" starting at 12,6€ ("-10% sales"),  but  they have 1 star on google and reviews and terms that these can be lost anytime with no backup (no raid even?) .</li>
</ul>
]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>zfs-2.3.0 is out - RAIDZ Expansion!</title>
        <link>https://lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/discussion/8988/zfs-2-3-0-is-out-raidz-expansion</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 16:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Technical</category>
        <dc:creator>nullnothere</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">8988@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>ZFS 2.3.0 was released a little earlier today.</p>

<p>The key features that make this release particularly exciting and not run of the mill:</p>

<p>RAIDZ Expansion (#15022): Add new devices to an existing RAIDZ pool, increasing storage capacity without downtime.</p>

<p>Fast Dedup (#15896): A major performance upgrade to the original OpenZFS deduplication functionality.</p>

<p>Direct IO (#10018): Allows bypassing the ARC for reads/writes, improving performance in scenarios like NVMe devices where caching may hinder efficiency.</p>

<p>Long names (#15921): Support for file and directory names up to 1023 characters.</p>

<p>See: <a href="https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases/tag/zfs-2.3.0" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases/tag/zfs-2.3.0</a></p>

<p>RAIDZ Expansion is what a LOT of people have been waiting for.</p>
]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>How to limit bandwidth of ZFS send/recv?</title>
        <link>https://lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/discussion/1458/how-to-limit-bandwidth-of-zfs-send-recv</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 03:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Technical</category>
        <dc:creator>laskinforest</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">1458@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hey all,<br />
I've been messing around with ZFS lately and it seems pretty cool. However, I can't seem to find a way to limit the bandwidth that is used for a ZFS send/recv.</p>

<p>I'm trying to send a ~400GB filesystem between two systems (sending is Ubuntu, receiving is FreeBSD): one at my house, and another on a server. I don't have a particularly fast connection (50 mbit/s), so I'm looking for a way to limit the bandwidth that ZFS uses so that my internet doesn't grind to a halt for almost a day.</p>

<p>I'm not in a rush to have the data transferred or anything, so I'd rather be able to use my internet than have it finish faster. I don't have a way of limiting the connection speed of a single host on my router, so a software solution on either the sending or receiving end would be highly preferred.</p>

<p>Any help would be greatly appreciated.</p>
]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
