Looking for 3 servers in Dallas

imokimok OG
edited July 18 in Requests

Hi!
I'm looking for 3 (or 4) servers in Dallas, US.

For each one:

  • Different node.
  • RAM 4gb
  • CPU: 2+ cores. Something more powerful than an E5v4.
  • Storage: 80gb - 100gb SSD or NVMe.
  • Network: 1gbps minimun
  • Private network would be nice.
  • $5/m per server is fine?

I'm trying to build a database cluster because I like to suffer.

My compute resources are in Dallas so I can't use another location. Unless I move my dedicated servers... but where? and it would more expensive these days... can we kill AI?

Comments

  • skorousskorous OGSenpai

    What sort of db cluster you setting up that won't fit on your existing dedis?

  • qpsqps Hosting ProviderOG

    @imok Why did you choose Dallas to begin with? Where are you located?

    QuickPacket - Dedicated Servers in Ashburn, Los Angeles, Chicago

  • @skorous said:
    What sort of db cluster you setting up that won't fit on your existing dedis?

    I don't want everything to die at the same time. And I only have 2 dedis in Dallas. I want to use this db cluster for all my apps.

    @qps said:
    @imok Why did you choose Dallas to begin with? Where are you located?

    In Peru. Lowest latency after Miami.

    Dallas was the cheapest like five years ago, I got a few good deals for the hardware and it's still there. Lots of storage, RAM and not-so-ancient CPUs, but they are almost full and I'm just waiting for the drives to fail. After that, I will be moving my stuff to another city, maybe.

  • imokimok OG
    edited July 18

    @imok said: Lowest latency after Miami.

    Ok it looks like Virginia is the 2nd lowest now. Something changed, ping increased.

  • SMARTHOSTSMARTHOST Hosting ProviderOG

    We can do something for you on Ryzen nodes in Dallas TX, but may just be a hair more expensive.
    Reach out to us at [email protected]

    ~ SMARTHOST

    SmartHost™ - Intelligent Hosting! - Multiple Locations - US/EU! - Join our Resale Program
    https://www.smarthost.net - sales@smarthost.net - Ultra-Fast NVME SSD KVM VPS - $2.95/month!

  • olokeoloke Hosting Provider

    Try asking @serverpoint for some custom deal.
    They offer VPS servers with private network in Dallas, USA.

    https://www.serverpoint.com/en/vps-hosting/

    Thanked by (1)imok
  • teamaccteamacc OGSenpai

    @MikeA might be out of your budget unless he does a special

    Thanked by (1)oloke

    Hey teamacc. You're a dick. (c) Jon Biloh, 2020.

  • MikeAMikeA Hosting ProviderOG
    edited July 18

    @teamacc said:
    @MikeA might be out of your budget unless he does a special

    I'm out of stock in Dallas practically, and I can't do very cheap deals now with memory prices, since I only build new hardware. Either way I don't do private networking unfortunately. Thanks though.

    Thanked by (4)oloke Not_Oles skorous imok
  • AK_KWHAK_KWH Hosting ProviderOG

    @imok said:
    Hi!
    I'm looking for 3 (or 4) servers in Dallas, US.

    For each one:

    • Different node.
    • RAM 4gb
    • CPU: 2+ cores. Something more powerful than an E5v4.
    • Storage: 80gb - 100gb SSD or NVMe.
    • Network: 1gbps minimun
    • Private network would be nice.
    • $5/m per server is fine?

    I'm trying to build a database cluster because I like to suffer.

    My compute resources are in Dallas so I can't use another location. Unless I move my dedicated servers... but where? and it would more expensive these days... can we kill AI?

    we have In Houston Texas 10Gbps with Gold 6152
    we can do 8$ a month
    4GB RAM
    80GB SSD
    2TB@10Gbps

    KhanWebHost Cheap Shared Hosting | Cheap KVM VPS (DE,UK,US,FR) | KVM Sale - LES Offers

  • caasifycaasify Hosting Provider
    edited July 19

    We provider Dallas cloud VPS on caasify, but our pricing is higher than your request. You can opt for a yearly payment to get a discount.

  • imokimok OG
    edited 5:03AM

    Thank you all!

    Got a server from @serverpoint, not the fastest but cheap enough :D I'll test it tomorrow and see if I would get the additional 3.

    Intel Xeon E5 v4
    4 vCPUs at 2.1 GHz
    8 GB RAM
    100 GB fast storage
    10 TB of data transfer per month
    1 IPv4 address
    1 Gbps network port

    BTW, I'm going to try PIGSTY https://pigsty.io/

  • @imok said:
    Thank you all!

    Got a server from @serverpoint, not the fastest but cheap enough :D I'll test it tomorrow and see if I would get the additional 3.

    Intel Xeon E5 v4
    4 vCPUs at 2.1 GHz
    8 GB RAM
    100 GB fast storage
    10 TB of data transfer per month
    1 IPv4 address
    1 Gbps network port

    BTW, I'm going to try PIGSTY https://pigsty.io/

    I’m afraid their disk speed isn’t enough for an etcd cluster. I use Patroni with etcd myself.

  • imokimok OG
    edited 5:19PM

    @arirang said:

    @imok said:
    Thank you all!

    Got a server from @serverpoint, not the fastest but cheap enough :D I'll test it tomorrow and see if I would get the additional 3.

    Intel Xeon E5 v4
    4 vCPUs at 2.1 GHz
    8 GB RAM
    100 GB fast storage
    10 TB of data transfer per month
    1 IPv4 address
    1 Gbps network port

    BTW, I'm going to try PIGSTY https://pigsty.io/

    I’m afraid their disk speed isn’t enough for an etcd cluster. I use Patroni with etcd myself.

    Sad. I'm not an expert with that. What speed should I be looking for?

    YABS from the new server:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2026-07-03                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Jul 20 12:05:03 CDT 2026
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 12 hours, 18 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699A v4 @ 2.40GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2399.988 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 128.0 MiB
    Disk       : 98.1 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-27-amd64
    VM Type    : MICROSOFT
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : ServerPoint.com
    ASN        : AS26277 ServerPoint.com
    Host       : Dallas TX Datacenter
    Location   : Dallas, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 74.17 MB/s   (18.1k) | 425.72 MB/s   (6.4k)
    Write      | 74.36 MB/s   (18.1k) | 427.97 MB/s   (6.5k)
    Total      | 148.53 MB/s  (36.2k) | 853.69 MB/s  (13.0k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 518.31 MB/s    (988) | 500.91 MB/s    (477)
    Write      | 545.85 MB/s   (1.0k) | 534.27 MB/s    (509)
    Total      | 1.06 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.03 GB/s      (986)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 746 Mbits/sec   | 650 Mbits/sec   | 102 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 905 Mbits/sec   | 2.59 Gbits/sec  | 106 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 2.67 Gbits/sec  | 198 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 770 Mbits/sec   | 3.83 Gbits/sec  | 235 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | 4.30 Gbits/sec  | 37.8 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 979 Mbits/sec   | 5.31 Gbits/sec  | 38.3 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 872 Mbits/sec   | 945 Mbits/sec   | 135 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     |                               
    Multi Core      |                               
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18769019
    
    YABS completed in 13 min 52 sec
    
  • It seems @arirang is correct. Disk speed is not enough, maybe because it's Ceph.

    /usr/lib/postgresql/15/bin/pg_test_fsync -f /tmp/test_wal -s 3
    3 seconds per test
    O_DIRECT supported on this platform for open_datasync and open_sync.
    
    Compare file sync methods using one 8kB write:
    (in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync is Linux's default)
            open_datasync                       246.266 ops/sec    4061 usecs/op
            fdatasync                           240.257 ops/sec    4162 usecs/op
            fsync                                86.970 ops/sec   11498 usecs/op
            fsync_writethrough                              n/a
            open_sync                           114.273 ops/sec    8751 usecs/op
    
    Compare file sync methods using two 8kB writes:
    (in wal_sync_method preference order, except fdatasync is Linux's default)
            open_datasync                       169.889 ops/sec    5886 usecs/op
            fdatasync                           350.292 ops/sec    2855 usecs/op
            fsync                               119.886 ops/sec    8341 usecs/op
            fsync_writethrough                              n/a
            open_sync                            58.619 ops/sec   17059 usecs/op
    
    Compare open_sync with different write sizes:
    (This is designed to compare the cost of writing 16kB in different write
    open_sync sizes.)
             1 * 16kB open_sync write           117.486 ops/sec    8512 usecs/op
             2 *  8kB open_sync writes           53.329 ops/sec   18751 usecs/op
             4 *  4kB open_sync writes           28.866 ops/sec   34643 usecs/op
             8 *  2kB open_sync writes           15.047 ops/sec   66458 usecs/op
            16 *  1kB open_sync writes            7.296 ops/sec  137070 usecs/op
    
    Test if fsync on non-write file descriptor is honored:
    (If the times are similar, fsync() can sync data written on a different
    descriptor.)
            write, fsync, close                 113.405 ops/sec    8818 usecs/op
            write, close, fsync                 118.875 ops/sec    8412 usecs/op
    
    Non-sync'ed 8kB writes:
            write                            723766.195 ops/sec       1 usecs/op
    

    Sad.

Sign In or Register to comment.