Nope. Home page, control panel are up, as well as all other services. It's only the NAT server.
It's also revealing that you keep choosing not to use a non-malicious IP to login and submit a proper ticket, choosing instead to post things like this in a public forum, and near the time Level 2 support closes.
Login is still at 24-08 on our systems. Whenever you're ready, we are.
I don't know which Zeta Findland my vps is on, but I'm quite satisfied with its performance. I also never felt any cpu steal, even though there was, the highest was only around 0.1%.
It's just a shame that it's only IPv6, if it also had IPv4, I think it would be perfect. And also when upgrading the VPS it took a very long time and at that time our VPS was down.
But other than that everything was very satisfying for me. So I can recommend this for those of you who are looking for a cheap VPS.
@KeqingWangy said:
I don't know which Zeta Findland my vps is on, but I'm quite satisfied with its performance. I also never felt any cpu steal, even though there was, the highest was only around 0.1%.
It's just a shame that it's only IPv6, if it also had IPv4, I think it would be perfect. And also when upgrading the VPS it took a very long time and at that time our VPS was down.
But other than that everything was very satisfying for me. So I can recommend this for those of you who are looking for a cheap VPS.
We will have dual-stack IPv4+IPv6 on some of the servers soon (with colocation), although we do prioritize IPv6 as a company strategy and network can therefore be a little better over IPv6 in comparison to IPv4. Some work has been done in August and will continue in September regarding transits, evaluation of our options, server structuring, etc.
We're also evaluating either a fixed NAT64 IPv4 on a per-server or per-region basis, or to create a dual-stack Socks5 proxy included with some or all of our plans, to go over that lack of solutions. Currently those have dynamic IPv4s via NAT64.
Your VPS is in the Zeta3 Finland, I believe, which has a Core i9-9900k allocated and upstreamed at Hetzner. Our CPUs do vary, it all depends on what we can get, if we can have a great deal for us we'll pass it on to the customer, but that's our best CPU so far. We also don't do nor won't ever program any steal, just pure maths to avoid it, so that 0.1% you're seeing is actually KVM in itself. The only thing that you can see at most is IOwait, but that is also very much controlled.
This also means we have to be a little strict with who consistently passes their shared allocation, monitorization and etc, but so far we didn't have many such cases, I'd say only 1-2% of our customers, and when we warn them of this, it mostly goes quite well.
Other thing we don't do as well is push our servers to the brim. Obviously a VPS is still resource-shared and etc, has their risks like everything, needs to be handled responsibly, but we've seen screenshots of competitors (on the OGF) at 75-90% per CPU at dedicated server level, and we let those at substantially less than that and pass on to purchase the next server when we reach a given predefined mark. This mostly implies we have to choose powerful equipment, etc, scale responsibly anyway, and be responsible as well with the CPU fair share allowance we execute on our plans, but that's something natural.
We do like what we do and want to give great offers.
Comments
We had a DoS attack at the NAT service (actually a first for us), coming from Ireland. That's why it is down.
Obviously all relevant measures will be taken.
Everything else is working, as of right now (hosting, WebStore, Remote, the MultiVPS offers, etc).
their home page, control panel, NAT service, all down.
Nope. Home page, control panel are up, as well as all other services. It's only the NAT server.
It's also revealing that you keep choosing not to use a non-malicious IP to login and submit a proper ticket, choosing instead to post things like this in a public forum, and near the time Level 2 support closes.
Login is still at 24-08 on our systems. Whenever you're ready, we are.
Zeta2 Finland now available again since 08:10 GMT+0, although investigation is still undergoing and measures are being taken, but it's active again.
I don't know which Zeta Findland my vps is on, but I'm quite satisfied with its performance. I also never felt any cpu steal, even though there was, the highest was only around 0.1%.
It's just a shame that it's only IPv6, if it also had IPv4, I think it would be perfect. And also when upgrading the VPS it took a very long time and at that time our VPS was down.
But other than that everything was very satisfying for me. So I can recommend this for those of you who are looking for a cheap VPS.
You can see my vps uptime at https://status.waifuwall.com
@cservers - do cservers have USB type-C available? In the front do they have a C-Section for an extra bay?
We will have dual-stack IPv4+IPv6 on some of the servers soon (with colocation), although we do prioritize IPv6 as a company strategy and network can therefore be a little better over IPv6 in comparison to IPv4. Some work has been done in August and will continue in September regarding transits, evaluation of our options, server structuring, etc.
We're also evaluating either a fixed NAT64 IPv4 on a per-server or per-region basis, or to create a dual-stack Socks5 proxy included with some or all of our plans, to go over that lack of solutions. Currently those have dynamic IPv4s via NAT64.
Your VPS is in the Zeta3 Finland, I believe, which has a Core i9-9900k allocated and upstreamed at Hetzner. Our CPUs do vary, it all depends on what we can get, if we can have a great deal for us we'll pass it on to the customer, but that's our best CPU so far. We also don't do nor won't ever program any steal, just pure maths to avoid it, so that 0.1% you're seeing is actually KVM in itself. The only thing that you can see at most is IOwait, but that is also very much controlled.
This also means we have to be a little strict with who consistently passes their shared allocation, monitorization and etc, but so far we didn't have many such cases, I'd say only 1-2% of our customers, and when we warn them of this, it mostly goes quite well.
Other thing we don't do as well is push our servers to the brim. Obviously a VPS is still resource-shared and etc, has their risks like everything, needs to be handled responsibly, but we've seen screenshots of competitors (on the OGF) at 75-90% per CPU at dedicated server level, and we let those at substantially less than that and pass on to purchase the next server when we reach a given predefined mark. This mostly implies we have to choose powerful equipment, etc, scale responsibly anyway, and be responsible as well with the CPU fair share allowance we execute on our plans, but that's something natural.
We do like what we do and want to give great offers.
Tiago