C-Servers Presents... Are You NUTS? November - Black Friday!

cserverscservers Hosting Provider
edited 9:50AM in Offers

Well, as for C-Servers, we knew we needed to be agressive this Black Friday. After all, we are growing, and we want to give the best to our customers, right?

Well, this is not agressive - THIS IS INSANE. Absolutely insane. We've never done one of these before... so we went crazy!

This is why our Black Friday offer is called "Are You NUTS? November". It's not only the pun, it's not only the art of tricky innuendos - it's the sheer offer in itself. Stop EVERYTHING you're doing, and listen to this. You've never seen one of those before!

Yeah, Donald Trump was elected, so what?

He still says to this day, "This is HUGE!". Believe us - he hasn't seen our offers yet. Check this MultiVPS HUGE one:

4 vCPU AMD Ryzen 9 3900 @ 3.1 GHz (60% Fair Share)
6144MB RAM + 4096MB SWAP
250GB NVMe RAID
1 Gbps Speed
40TB Bandwidth
Crypto and Illegal Not Allowed
Special One-Off Promo - Non-Refundable
1 IPv6 /64 + 1 IPv4 NAT (10 TCP + 5 UDP)
NAT64/DNS64/NAT46 Included
Very Limited Stock - Spots: 10
Location: Finland, Uusimaa

Do you know what is our final price? 3.33 USD per month, paid quarterly (at 9.99USD). Yes! It's like 0,50USD per GB of RAM.

Buy Here

And it can go even lower with higher service periods, down to 1.94 USD/month - we simply cannot advertise these here, but just so you know, they exist. This is common to all offers, by the way.

Did you want something even more insanely huge? We've got you covered with our MultiVPS INSANELY HUGE offer:

4 vCPU AMD Ryzen 9 3900 @ 3.1 GHz (67% Fair Share)
12288MB RAM + 6144MB SWAP (yes, 12GB!)
500GB NVMe RAID (yes!)
1 Gbps Speed
50TB Bandwidth
Crypto and Illegal Not Allowed
1 IPv6 /64 + 1 IPv4 NAT (10 TCP + 5 UDP)
Special One-Off Promo - Non-Refundable
NAT64/DNS64/NAT46 Included
Very Limited Stock - Spots: 4
Location: Finland, Uusimaa

Our final price? 4.49USD per month, paid quarterly (at 13.49 USD). That's 0.37USD per GB of RAM!

Buy Here

These are prices that stay forever once you've done your purchase. No coupons, no hassle, the best service. As simple as it gets.

What are you waiting for? Join us at C-Servers and benefit from top Hetzner-sourced servers at the best price you'll get anywhere. We are waiting for you!

Thanked by (1)sh97
Tagged:

Comments

  • yoursunnyyoursunny OG

    No PayPal no order.

    Chase Freedom rewards 5% in Q4 on PayPal and McDonald's purchases.
    Apple Card rewards 2% on Apply Pay purchases.
    From customer point of view, PayPal is 3.06% cheaper than Stripe.

    Thanked by (1)vyas

    HostBrr aff best VPS; VirmAche aff worst VPS.
    Unable to push-up due to shoulder injury 😣

  • curiouswanderercuriouswanderer

    YABS for the 12GB plan

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2024-06-09                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Thu Nov 21 05:46:48 AM UTC 2024

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 4 minutes
Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 4 @ 3094.186 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 11.7 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 499.9 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-9-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ❌ Offline / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Hetzner Online GmbH
ASN        : AS24940 Hetzner Online GmbH
Location   : Helsinki, Uusimaa (18)
Country    : Finland

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 230.12 MB/s  (57.5k) | 1.71 GB/s    (26.7k)
Write      | 230.73 MB/s  (57.6k) | 1.71 GB/s    (26.8k)
Total      | 460.86 MB/s (115.2k) | 3.42 GB/s    (53.5k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 2.29 GB/s     (4.4k) | 2.62 GB/s     (2.5k)
Write      | 2.41 GB/s     (4.7k) | 2.79 GB/s     (2.7k)
Total      | 4.71 GB/s     (9.2k) | 5.41 GB/s     (5.2k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 379 Mbits/sec   | 214 Mbits/sec   | 38.9 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 823 Mbits/sec   | 870 Mbits/sec   | 29.6 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 797 Mbits/sec   | 185 Mbits/sec   | 69.0 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 509 Mbits/sec   | 148 Mbits/sec   | 238 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 676 Mbits/sec   | 100 Mbits/sec   | 157 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 717 Mbits/sec   | 222 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms         
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 552 Mbits/sec   | 109 Mbits/sec   | 225 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1501                          
Multi Core      | 4383                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8981545

YABS completed in 11 min 38 sec
    Thanked by (1)edrebe

    Best and friendliest host Hostbrr aff.

  • cserverscservers Hosting Provider

    We've just corrected a mistake on the CPU model of the first post, it's indeed a Ryzen 9 3900 and not a Core i9-9900K. Our apologies for any inconvenience caused.

    Performance-wise both are similar however, so no real loss there.

  • yucchunyucchun

    Hello, can you elaborate on your fair usage policy? Thank you! :smiley:

    datalix's aff #1 fan

  • JabJab

    @cservers said: 6144MB RAM + 4096MB SWAP

    Is this LXC/OpenVZ that you mention SWAP that should be user-configurable on rest of virtualizations?

    Haven't bought a single service in VirMach Great Ryzen 2022 - 2023 Flash Sale.
    https://lowendspirit.com/uploads/editor/gi/ippw0lcmqowk.png

  • cserverscservers Hosting Provider

    @yucchun said:
    Hello, can you elaborate on your fair usage policy? Thank you! :smiley:

    Essentially this is not for crypto or illegal (our upstream is Hetzner), and up to the alloted traffic, RAM, HDD and CPU fair share, it's fair game :)

    Specific for this offer, after the allocated traffic, the VPS is still usable and will still have Internet, limited to 50/50 Mbps. With a ticket and technical justification, can be extended up to 100/100 Mbps. Traffic renews on the day/month of purchase, every month.

    @Jab said:

    @cservers said: 6144MB RAM + 4096MB SWAP

    Is this LXC/OpenVZ that you mention SWAP that should be user-configurable on rest of virtualizations?

    This is pure KVM :)

    SolusVM's templates do not come with preconfigured swap, but we let the customer configure their swap as they please up to that amount.

    LXC is actually reserved for much simpler offers, wouldn't make much sense to put 12GB of RAM and then go the LXC route to merely save 150MB and lose the full kernel/separation, hehe.

    Thanked by (1)yoursunny
  • yucchunyucchun

    @cservers said:

    @yucchun said:
    Hello, can you elaborate on your fair usage policy? Thank you! :smiley:

    Essentially this is not for crypto or illegal (our upstream is Hetzner), and up to the alloted traffic, RAM, HDD and CPU fair share, it's fair game :)

    Specific for this offer, after the allocated traffic, the VPS is still usable and will still have Internet, limited to 50/50 Mbps. With a ticket and technical justification, can be extended up to 100/100 Mbps. Traffic renews on the day/month of purchase, every month.

    Mmm, I'd love to host an instance of Bluemap on a system like this one, but it can be very aggressive towards the host's CPU because it is software rendering. How does the fair share work in this type of situation?

    Also, amazing offer :D

    datalix's aff #1 fan

  • cserverscservers Hosting Provider
    edited 1:17PM

    @yucchun said:

    @cservers said:

    @yucchun said:
    Hello, can you elaborate on your fair usage policy? Thank you! :smiley:

    Essentially this is not for crypto or illegal (our upstream is Hetzner), and up to the alloted traffic, RAM, HDD and CPU fair share, it's fair game :)

    Specific for this offer, after the allocated traffic, the VPS is still usable and will still have Internet, limited to 50/50 Mbps. With a ticket and technical justification, can be extended up to 100/100 Mbps. Traffic renews on the day/month of purchase, every month.

    Mmm, I'd love to host an instance of Bluemap on a system like this one, but it can be very aggressive towards the host's CPU because it is software rendering. How does the fair share work in this type of situation?

    Also, amazing offer :D

    In this case, you can use any Linux tool that globally limits the CPU usage on your VPS (server-wide or per-process), like CPUTool or CPULimit for example, and run the Bluemap instance configured :)

    We'd possibly recommend about 45-50% per vCPU on that process so that you have still room to use your VPS for other things as well. If you won't be using it for anything else you can e.g. push it to 60% without any problem.

    Thank you! :)

  • yoursunnyyoursunny OG

    @cservers said:

    @yucchun said:

    @cservers said:

    @yucchun said:

    Mmm, I'd love to host an instance of Bluemap on a system like this one, but it can be very aggressive towards the host's CPU because it is software rendering. How does the fair share work in this type of situation?

    In this case, you can use any Linux tool that globally limits the CPU usage on your VPS (server-wide or per-process), like CPUTool or CPULimit for example, and run the Bluemap instance configured :)

    We'd possibly recommend about 45-50% per vCPU on that process so that you have still room to use your VPS for other things as well. If you won't be using it for anything else you can e.g. push it to 60% without any problem.

    Is it OK to run two cores at 100% and keep other two cores completely idle?
    If so, a better solution would be binding all processes to cpu0 and cpu1 via systemd.
    This is more efficient than enforcing CPU limit via userspace tools such as cpulimit.

    HostBrr aff best VPS; VirmAche aff worst VPS.
    Unable to push-up due to shoulder injury 😣

  • TurnerTurner

    @yoursunny said:
    No PayPal no order.

    Thank you, saves me the effort!

    Thanked by (2)ehab vyas
  • cserverscservers Hosting Provider

    @yoursunny said:

    @cservers said:

    @yucchun said:

    @cservers said:

    @yucchun said:

    Mmm, I'd love to host an instance of Bluemap on a system like this one, but it can be very aggressive towards the host's CPU because it is software rendering. How does the fair share work in this type of situation?

    In this case, you can use any Linux tool that globally limits the CPU usage on your VPS (server-wide or per-process), like CPUTool or CPULimit for example, and run the Bluemap instance configured :)

    We'd possibly recommend about 45-50% per vCPU on that process so that you have still room to use your VPS for other things as well. If you won't be using it for anything else you can e.g. push it to 60% without any problem.

    Is it OK to run two cores at 100% and keep other two cores completely idle?
    If so, a better solution would be binding all processes to cpu0 and cpu1 via systemd.
    This is more efficient than enforcing CPU limit via userspace tools such as cpulimit.

    When we calculate CPU utilization (on our checks) we look at the aggregate percentage of the VPS - having 4 cores at 60% for example means that the VPS can go up to 240% of aggregate CPU utilization.

    That being said, and if it has less overhead, specific for these cases with 4 cores it could be done, although we'd recommend them at most with 90% effective usage per core or the VPS on a single process since going full 100% and "deactivating" 2 would leave any PC (or VPS) slow on other processes. It may also cause punctual IOwait higher than usual. That's why we do our approach on multicore.

Sign In or Register to comment.

© LowEndSpirit 2024

ipv6 ready