Enpass Lifetime Deal seems to be shortly back in stock after having been removed previously

YmpkerYmpker OGContent WriterSenpai
in General

After Enpass has removed the lifetime deal from their Website and Stacksocial a while ago (to my knowledge), it seems to be now temporarily back on their official website for some 64€:
https://www.enpass.io/pricing/

Ympker's VPN LTD Comparison, Uptime.is, Ympker's GitHub.

Thanked by (1)Wonder_Woman

Comments

  • imokimok OG

    Good.
    I'm glad I got it for $10 years ago 😅

    Thanked by (1)Ympker
  • somiksomik OG

    Whats wrong with using self hosted Bitwarden/Vaultwarden? I mean why on earth would i trust rando companies with my data on their server?

    If you want information, feign ignorance reply with the wrong answer. Internet people will correct you ASAP!
    It’s OK if you disagree with me. I can’t force you to be right!

  • YmpkerYmpker OGContent WriterSenpai
    edited March 29

    @somik said:
    Whats wrong with using self hosted Bitwarden/Vaultwarden? I mean why on earth would i trust rando companies with my data on their server?

    There's nothing wrong with Bitwarden/Vaultwarden. They're great options.
    You don't have to use Enpass. That said, Enpass also supports local/wifi sync, WebDAV and other methods. Vault is stored online encrypted and only decrypted on device (not online).
    It's worked well for me over the years. 80-90% of users probably use Google Pw Manager in Browser or Apple's Built-In. Others use software like Enpass, OnePassword etc, and others self-host. There are many options and you'll have to decide for yourself what you're comfortable with using. For me, Enpass fit my needs 5+ years ago and still works great. No need for me to switch, really.

    Ympker's VPN LTD Comparison, Uptime.is, Ympker's GitHub.

  • somiksomik OG

    @Ympker said:

    @somik said:
    Whats wrong with using self hosted Bitwarden/Vaultwarden? I mean why on earth would i trust rando companies with my data on their server?

    There's nothing wrong with Bitwarden/Vaultwarden. They're great options.
    You don't have to use Enpass. That said, Enpass also supports local/wifi sync, WebDAV and other methods. Vault is stored online encrypted and only decrypted on device (not online).
    It's worked well for me over the years. 80-90% of users probably use Google Pw Manager in Browser or Apple's Built-In. Others use software like Enpass, OnePassword etc, and others self-host. There are many options and you'll have to decide for yourself what you're comfortable with using. For me, Enpass fit my needs 5+ years ago and still works great. No need for me to switch, really.

    Bitwarden app also allows local/wifi syncs. They also support 2FA and webauth. Similarly, vault is stored on server but decoded client side (on device). So I guess Enpass is similar to Bitwarden's online (non-selfhosted) service.

    I've been using bitwarden/vaultwarden only for the last 2 or 3 years. Before that, I used to use the google chrome's password save feature for things i did not care about until I learned that it can be hacked and all your passwords be stolen...

    Thanked by (1)Ympker

    If you want information, feign ignorance reply with the wrong answer. Internet people will correct you ASAP!
    It’s OK if you disagree with me. I can’t force you to be right!

  • YmpkerYmpker OGContent WriterSenpai

    @somik said:

    @Ympker said:

    @somik said:
    Whats wrong with using self hosted Bitwarden/Vaultwarden? I mean why on earth would i trust rando companies with my data on their server?

    There's nothing wrong with Bitwarden/Vaultwarden. They're great options.
    You don't have to use Enpass. That said, Enpass also supports local/wifi sync, WebDAV and other methods. Vault is stored online encrypted and only decrypted on device (not online).
    It's worked well for me over the years. 80-90% of users probably use Google Pw Manager in Browser or Apple's Built-In. Others use software like Enpass, OnePassword etc, and others self-host. There are many options and you'll have to decide for yourself what you're comfortable with using. For me, Enpass fit my needs 5+ years ago and still works great. No need for me to switch, really.

    Bitwarden app also allows local/wifi syncs. They also support 2FA and webauth. Similarly, vault is stored on server but decoded client side (on device). So I guess Enpass is similar to Bitwarden's online (non-selfhosted) service.

    I've been using bitwarden/vaultwarden only for the last 2 or 3 years. Before that, I used to use the google chrome's password save feature for things i did not care about until I learned that it can be hacked and all your passwords be stolen...

    Sounds like a solid switch. Especially, because Chrome pw save is only for Browser and not for applications or other logins. That said, I've heard google pw manager became safer as you can now apparently encrypt all passwords with your biometrics or otherwhise so that just a hijacked cookie session or browser steal isn't enough anymore to see/view all passwords. That said, it's probably still best to resort to other pw managers.

    Ympker's VPN LTD Comparison, Uptime.is, Ympker's GitHub.

  • JosephJoseph

    @Ympker said:
    Especially, because Chrome pw save is only for Browser and not for applications or other logins. That said, I've heard google pw manager became safer as you can now apparently encrypt all passwords with your biometrics or otherwhise so that just a hijacked cookie session or browser steal isn't enough anymore to see/view all passwords. That said, it's probably still best to resort to other pw managers.

    Google Password Manager works for applications.

    Thanked by (1)Ympker
  • JosephJoseph
    edited March 29

    If someone is currently using Google Password Manager, is there any compelling reasons to change (and what are they)?

    And if one does change, and is looking for the same ease of use and no self-hosting, what is the best option?

    Thanked by (1)Ympker
  • YmpkerYmpker OGContent WriterSenpai

    @Joseph said:

    @Ympker said:
    Especially, because Chrome pw save is only for Browser and not for applications or other logins. That said, I've heard google pw manager became safer as you can now apparently encrypt all passwords with your biometrics or otherwhise so that just a hijacked cookie session or browser steal isn't enough anymore to see/view all passwords. That said, it's probably still best to resort to other pw managers.

    Google Password Manager works for applications.

    Good to know. Haven't used it in a while.

    Ympker's VPN LTD Comparison, Uptime.is, Ympker's GitHub.

  • imokimok OG

    @Joseph said:
    If someone is currently using Google Password Manager, is there any compelling reasons to change (and what are they)?

    And if one does change, and is looking for the same ease of use and no self-hosting, what is the best option?

    It just works on my laptop and in my mobile. Nothing to do and my passwords are there.

  • lowendmeowlowendmeow

    @Joseph said:
    If someone is currently using Google Password Manager, is there any compelling reasons to change (and what are they)?

    And if one does change, and is looking for the same ease of use and no self-hosting, what is the best option?

    I believe the data in there is not truly end to end encrypted by default if this is something you're concerned about.

  • JosephJoseph
    edited March 30

    @lowendmeow said:

    @Joseph said:
    If someone is currently using Google Password Manager, is there any compelling reasons to change (and what are they)?

    And if one does change, and is looking for the same ease of use and no self-hosting, what is the best option?

    I believe the data in there is not truly end to end encrypted by default if this is something you're concerned about.

    That's true by default, but you can enable end to end encryption with a setting.

Sign In or Register to comment.

© LowEndSpirit 2026

ipv6 ready