cybertech
cybertech
Not much happening here, yet.
About
- Username
- cybertech
- Joined
- Visits
- 29,646
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, OG, Benchmark King
- Thanked
- 3810
- About Me:
- I am a by-product of the Y2K bug.
Comments
-
(Image)
-
Free is good. Looks like no full core access
-
Congratulations sir!
-
Waiting for birthday benches
-
What can I say Happy birthday
-
(Quote) 2nd looks like ryzen, they seem to be more efficient. whats first one provider?
-
(Quote) 6.95
-
(Quote) I think CPU works as expected; it's a 2660v2 after all. (Don't know if 2660 is better than 2650 though) I wouldn't have expected Gold/Ryzen for this price either. It's a good LES exclusive deal considering price, big ram/ssd and dedicated …
-
(Quote) Bench pls?
-
(Quote) Almost...just realised CPUs not the bottleneck for my use so.... :tongue: would have grabbed it in a heartbeat if I didn't already have a yearly from Ant
-
(Quote) Yes indeed I like -4
-
(Quote) Because I like the high score
-
(Quote) Not for annual mate.... :sweat_smile:
-
Wait a minute......3 cores....? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Any bench?
-
Readydedis 4GB Falkenstein [root@cybertech ~]# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash -s -- -4i# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## Yet-Another-Bench-Script ## v2020-02-10 ## http…
-
Readydedis 4GB Falkenstein --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS : CentOS 7.8.2003 (64 Bit) Virt/Kernel : KVM / 5.6.15-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 CPU Model : AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor CPU …
-
(Quote) fo $30 / year its a steal though
-
(Quote) > OS : CentOS 7.6.1810 (64 Bit) > Virt/Kernel : KVM / 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64 > CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v4 @ 2.20GHz > CPU Cores : 8 @ 2199.…
-
(Quote) > OS : CentOS 7.6.1810 (64 Bit) Virt/Kernel : KVM / 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64 CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v4 @ 2.20GHz CPU Cores : 8 @ 2199.996 MHz x86_64 …
-
What hostdoc?
-
cool
-
(Quote) Never tried scaleway due to lack of PayPal. Guess it's no loss then :tongue:
-
(Quote) Yeah I meant netcup. Saw some of their older rootserver benches it seems not at 100% thread anyways
-
(Quote) I was under the impression that it's how VDS works but seems I'm wrong, anyway no point spending 37 EUR to test it out.
-
I think they dedicate the disk space. And perhaps set a higher limit for IOP but that's all. I'm more interested to know how the CPU physical cores fare. Most dedicated vcpu threads performance drop over time
-
Contabo is known to limit their I/O for vps. Would be interesting to see if it's the same for VDS. Also why nested virt is "possible" instead of "enabled"