Is offering $100 per month for a VPS fine as long as a one-time discount for the first month of 95 % is offered?
Shouldn't the maximum "$7 per month" be the recurring price?
May I also suggest that specifying a "per month" price that is only valid for the first month is misleading and shouldn't be allowed.
Only $100.00 per month $ 5.00 per month 95 % OFF for first month
vs.
Only $5.00 for first month, $100.00 per month thereafter
I see that you've come here after looking at my LES Exclusive offer post.
Its not misleading at all, I mentioned it in 3 places of the post that it was only for the first month.
title
heading
right below the price
Unless the person is having difficulty seeing, its very clear that its a first month offer.
@bikegremlin said:
Capitalism, free market and all.
Don't tell me you'd prefer we enforced Communism?!
Sure.
The core principle of communism is that you take what you need, no payment required.
I need 8 cores for encoding push-up videos, and the server @cmeerw is using looks perfect.
@bikegremlin said:
Capitalism, free market and all.
Don't tell me you'd prefer we enforced Communism?!
Sure.
The core principle of communism is that you take what you need, no payment required.
I need 8 cores for encoding push-up videos, and the server @cmeerw is using looks perfect.
Now 4 cores8 cores double cores for the first month
How many cores do you get for the first month, and how many for the following months?
And someone has to explain to me what this has to do with Communism.
@bikegremlin said:
Capitalism, free market and all.
Don't tell me you'd prefer we enforced Communism?!
Sure.
The core principle of communism is that you take what you need, no payment required.
I need 8 cores for encoding push-up videos, and the server @cmeerw is using looks perfect.
Now 4 cores8 cores/mo double cores for the first month
How many cores do you get for the first month, and how many for the following months?
And someone has to explain to me what this has to do with Communism.
@bikegremlin said:
Capitalism, free market and all.
Don't tell me you'd prefer we enforced Communism?!
Sure.
The core principle of communism is that you take what you need, no payment required.
I need 8 cores for encoding push-up videos, and the server @cmeerw is using looks perfect.
Comrade, I am sad to say that your request could not be fulfilled because of the US-emposed sanctions.
Please continue contributing according to your ability for pushups, and the victory will be imminent!
Setup fees are not allowed on any service other than dedicated servers. The dedicated server setup fee can be a maximum of 1 month equivalent of server cost, only providers that have been established for 3+ years may charge a setup fee on dedicated servers.
Setup fees are not allowed on any service other than dedicated servers. The dedicated server setup fee can be a maximum of 1 month equivalent of server cost, only providers that have been established for 3+ years may charge a setup fee on dedicated servers.
An exception was granted as was already communicated. I am in favor of allowing Colo to have setup fees too as that makes more sense to me than dedicated services being the only service that allows setup fees. I'll take that back to the team.
Setup fees are not allowed on any service other than dedicated servers. The dedicated server setup fee can be a maximum of 1 month equivalent of server cost, only providers that have been established for 3+ years may charge a setup fee on dedicated servers.
An exception was granted as was already communicated. I am in favor of allowing Colo to have setup fees too as that makes more sense to me than dedicated services being the only service that allows setup fees. I'll take that back to the team.
I agree Colo having a "return to sender" fee makes sense.
Setup fees are not allowed on any service other than dedicated servers. The dedicated server setup fee can be a maximum of 1 month equivalent of server cost, only providers that have been established for 3+ years may charge a setup fee on dedicated servers.
An exception was granted as was already communicated. I am in favor of allowing Colo to have setup fees too as that makes more sense to me than dedicated services being the only service that allows setup fees. I'll take that back to the team.
I agree Colo having a "return to sender" fee makes sense.
The "return to sender fee" is usually charged at the backend - when the customer wants equipment returned, the colo provider charges a remote hands fee to derack the equipment and charges a shipping fee to mail the equipment (unless customer provides shipping label).
If the colo provider charges "return to sender fee" upfront and then deadpools, the customer loses not only the equipment but also the fee.
However, if the customer wants to cancel service and abandon equipment, the colo provider would have to absorb disposal costs.
This cost could be amortized into the monthly price.
Setup fees are not allowed on any service other than dedicated servers. The dedicated server setup fee can be a maximum of 1 month equivalent of server cost, only providers that have been established for 3+ years may charge a setup fee on dedicated servers.
An exception was granted as was already communicated. I am in favor of allowing Colo to have setup fees too as that makes more sense to me than dedicated services being the only service that allows setup fees. I'll take that back to the team.
I agree Colo having a "return to sender" fee makes sense.
The "return to sender fee" is usually charged at the backend - when the customer wants equipment returned, the colo provider charges a remote hands fee to derack the equipment and charges a shipping fee to mail the equipment (unless customer provides shipping label).
If the colo provider charges "return to sender fee" upfront and then deadpools, the customer loses not only the equipment but also the fee.
However, if the customer wants to cancel service and abandon equipment, the colo provider would have to absorb disposal costs.
This cost could be amortized into the monthly price.
You can stop with the walls of text. I am not new to this industry and don't need to explanations.
The Admins made the decision live with it or don't period.
Setup fees are not allowed on any service other than dedicated servers. The dedicated server setup fee can be a maximum of 1 month equivalent of server cost, only providers that have been established for 3+ years may charge a setup fee on dedicated servers.
An exception was granted as was already communicated. I am in favor of allowing Colo to have setup fees too as that makes more sense to me than dedicated services being the only service that allows setup fees. I'll take that back to the team.
I agree Colo having a "return to sender" fee makes sense.
The "return to sender fee" is usually charged at the backend - when the customer wants equipment returned, the colo provider charges a remote hands fee to derack the equipment and charges a shipping fee to mail the equipment (unless customer provides shipping label).
If the colo provider charges "return to sender fee" upfront and then deadpools, the customer loses not only the equipment but also the fee.
However, if the customer wants to cancel service and abandon equipment, the colo provider would have to absorb disposal costs.
This cost could be amortized into the monthly price.
Just because "everyone else does it" doesn't mean everyone will have to do it. Thinking outside of the box is what gives new ideas to old providers.
I will also post this here.
The question was asked before the post, Admins gave it an OK, offer was posted.
Now, let's leave this and focus on something else.
In the spirit of BF/CM the following rules under the "Rules for posting offers:" are suspended for members with a LES Hosting or Service Provider tag from 00:01 (UTC) November 29th to 23:59 (PST) December 2nd, 2024.
$7 p/month Maximum for VPS offers
$99 p/month Maximum for Dedicated server offers
$70 p/month Maximum per U for COLO offers
$3 p/month Maximum for Shared hosting offers
$7 p/month Maximum for Reseller hosting offers
$5 p/month Maximum for VPN/Proxy related offers
$5 p/month Maximum for Email related offers
Setup fees are not allowed on any service other than dedicated servers. The dedicated server setup fee can be a maximum of 1 month equivalent of server cost.
@pike said: @AnthonySmith you cleared the drama and now it looks like you banned someone because he criticized you. At least that was my impression until I noticed you deleted some posts.
@pike said: @AnthonySmith you cleared the drama and now it looks like you banned someone because he criticized you. At least that was my impression until I noticed you deleted some posts.
@mikho said: Trial offers (Test our service free for X amount of time) are NOT considered free
So, "Free VPS trial for 1 month" is not considered free, but "Free VPS for 1 month" is?
Could this be clarified where the line between "free" and "not free" is? I don't think I am the only one confused here.
A trial is something that automagically converts to a monthly or yearly subscription. Like opt-out on marketing emails.
Where as 1 month free should be considered as opt-in.
You have to manually convert to a subscription if you get the chance to continue using your service.
If a free offer is posted and its not an opt-in to continue using, feel free to flag the thread and admin/mods will handle it.
@mikho said: Trial offers (Test our service free for X amount of time) are NOT considered free
So, "Free VPS trial for 1 month" is not considered free, but "Free VPS for 1 month" is?
Could this be clarified where the line between "free" and "not free" is? I don't think I am the only one confused here.
A trial is something that automagically converts to a monthly or yearly subscription. Like opt-out on marketing emails.
Where as 1 month free should be considered as opt-in.
You have to manually convert to a subscription if you get the chance to continue using your service.
If a free offer is posted and its not an opt-in to continue using, feel free to flag the thread and admin/mods will handle it.
Exactly how I explained it when asked about it in PM. A free trial converts to payment of some kind. A free offer is free for the duration of the product line. If it is one month so be it, as long as it is stated in the offer. The rest of the requirements like an account that is so old, or post, or comments are fine as long as they do not ask for posts to get it, or other compemsation like reviews, money (obxiously), etc...
Can we make/ enforce a rule to have pricing for allowed plans in the provider post offers else the post is taken down and a cool down period is enforced?
Is it just me or it feels scummy / lazy on providers part
Comments
I see that you've come here after looking at my LES Exclusive offer post.
Its not misleading at all, I mentioned it in 3 places of the post that it was only for the first month.
Unless the person is having difficulty seeing, its very clear that its a first month offer.
I don't find any issue with this allowance.
Capitalism, free market and all.
Don't tell me you'd prefer we enforced Communism?!
Edit:
Almost forgot one of my favourites:
"Vote with your wallet."
Relja of House Novović, the First of His Name, King of the Plains, the Breaker of Chains, WirMach Wolves pack member
BikeGremlin's web-hosting reviews
Sure.
The core principle of communism is that you take what you need, no payment required.
I need 8 cores for encoding push-up videos, and the server @cmeerw is using looks perfect.
Accepting submissions for IPv6 less than /64 Hall of Incompetence.
Now 4 cores 8 cores
double cores for the first month
How many cores do you get for the first month, and how many for the following months?
And someone has to explain to me what this has to do with Communism.
fixed that for you
Comrade, I am sad to say that your request could not be fulfilled because of the US-emposed sanctions.
Please continue contributing according to your ability for pushups, and the victory will be imminent!
Relja of House Novović, the First of His Name, King of the Plains, the Breaker of Chains, WirMach Wolves pack member
BikeGremlin's web-hosting reviews
Due to recent events, a clarification on the rules has been added to the first post.
Regarding posting Free Offers.
“Technology is best when it brings people together.” – Matt Mullenweg
Title says rules were updated in the future
Check our KVM VPS (flags are clickable): 🇵🇱 🇸🇪 | Looking glass: 🇵🇱 🇸🇪
We used the LES time machine made out of 8086 and shoe strings
Free Hosting at YetiNode | Cryptid Security | URL Shortener | LaunchVPS | ExtraVM | Host-C | In the Node, or Out of the Loop?
Yeah - but that's still a bit old. I thought we were five years ahead of our time?!
Relja of House Novović, the First of His Name, King of the Plains, the Breaker of Chains, WirMach Wolves pack member
BikeGremlin's web-hosting reviews
Imma fix this thread permanently
Free Hosting at YetiNode | Cryptid Security | URL Shortener | LaunchVPS | ExtraVM | Host-C | In the Node, or Out of the Loop?
Thread title changed to:
Please, can we have January 1, 1970?
I hope everyone gets the servers they want!
Nope 1935 it is
Free Hosting at YetiNode | Cryptid Security | URL Shortener | LaunchVPS | ExtraVM | Host-C | In the Node, or Out of the Loop?
Reminds me,
youtube.com/watch?v=k1BneeJTDcU
Apparently "HDD colo" i.e. VPS with a customer-provided drive can charge setup fee now.
https://lowendspirit.com/discussion/comment/191450/#Comment_191450
Please revise the rule to reflect that.
Accepting submissions for IPv6 less than /64 Hall of Incompetence.
An exception was granted as was already communicated. I am in favor of allowing Colo to have setup fees too as that makes more sense to me than dedicated services being the only service that allows setup fees. I'll take that back to the team.
Head Janitor @ LES • About • Rules • Support
I agree Colo having a "return to sender" fee makes sense.
Free Hosting at YetiNode | Cryptid Security | URL Shortener | LaunchVPS | ExtraVM | Host-C | In the Node, or Out of the Loop?
The "return to sender fee" is usually charged at the backend - when the customer wants equipment returned, the colo provider charges a remote hands fee to derack the equipment and charges a shipping fee to mail the equipment (unless customer provides shipping label).
If the colo provider charges "return to sender fee" upfront and then deadpools, the customer loses not only the equipment but also the fee.
However, if the customer wants to cancel service and abandon equipment, the colo provider would have to absorb disposal costs.
This cost could be amortized into the monthly price.
Accepting submissions for IPv6 less than /64 Hall of Incompetence.
You can stop with the walls of text. I am not new to this industry and don't need to explanations.
The Admins made the decision live with it or don't period.
Free Hosting at YetiNode | Cryptid Security | URL Shortener | LaunchVPS | ExtraVM | Host-C | In the Node, or Out of the Loop?
Just because "everyone else does it" doesn't mean everyone will have to do it. Thinking outside of the box is what gives new ideas to old providers.
I will also post this here.
The question was asked before the post, Admins gave it an OK, offer was posted.
Now, let's leave this and focus on something else.
“Technology is best when it brings people together.” – Matt Mullenweg
Maybe clarify that if exceptions are granted that the first post has to state that an exception was made? Would prevent a lot of this discussion
Hey teamacc. You're a dick. (c) Jon Biloh, 2020.
In the spirit of BF/CM the following rules under the "Rules for posting offers:" are suspended for members with a LES Hosting or Service Provider tag from 00:01 (UTC) November 29th to 23:59 (PST) December 2nd, 2024.
For staff assistance or support issues please use the helpdesk ticket system at https://support.lowendspirit.com/index.php?a=add
that's called DEMOCRACY
@pike was last active in March of 2022, so ??
For staff assistance or support issues please use the helpdesk ticket system at https://support.lowendspirit.com/index.php?a=add
So, "Free VPS trial for 1 month" is not considered free, but "Free VPS for 1 month" is?
Could this be clarified where the line between "free" and "not free" is? I don't think I am the only one confused here.
A trial is something that automagically converts to a monthly or yearly subscription. Like opt-out on marketing emails.
Where as 1 month free should be considered as opt-in.
You have to manually convert to a subscription if you get the chance to continue using your service.
If a free offer is posted and its not an opt-in to continue using, feel free to flag the thread and admin/mods will handle it.
“Technology is best when it brings people together.” – Matt Mullenweg
Exactly how I explained it when asked about it in PM. A free trial converts to payment of some kind. A free offer is free for the duration of the product line. If it is one month so be it, as long as it is stated in the offer. The rest of the requirements like an account that is so old, or post, or comments are fine as long as they do not ask for posts to get it, or other compemsation like reviews, money (obxiously), etc...
Free Hosting at YetiNode | Cryptid Security | URL Shortener | LaunchVPS | ExtraVM | Host-C | In the Node, or Out of the Loop?
Can we make/ enforce a rule to have pricing for allowed plans in the provider post offers else the post is taken down and a cool down period is enforced?
Is it just me or it feels scummy / lazy on providers part