servaRICA Black Friday 2022 - Storage - Dedicated - NVMe - Hybrid - SSD - 10x GIVEAWAY

2456

Comments

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Hosting ProviderOG

    @elliotc said:
    What's the renew price for the giveaway?

    12$/y which is even less than cost but this is the point of the giveaway :)

    Thanked by (1)elliotc
  • JabJab

    with IPv4?
    C-R-A-Z-Y.

    Haven't bought a single service in VirMach Great Ryzen 2022 - 2023 Flash Sale.
    https://lowendspirit.com/uploads/editor/gi/ippw0lcmqowk.png

  • hypertonhyperton

    Thanks for the giveaway and good luck with sales!

  • localhostlocalhost OG

    Nice give away

  • deepak_lebdeepak_leb OG

    any ipv6 storage server ? @servarica_hani

  • beaglebeagle OG

    Great offers!

  • ariq01ariq01

    Fantastic offer, good orangutan

    I’m a simple man I see gifs, I press thanks

  • Sanjue007Sanjue007

    Here for the giveaway.

  • jcnjcn

    Great offer, thanks for the sale!

  • james50ajames50a OG

    Considering, but wanted to know if there was an option to expand storage ie say I bought salamander hybrid and needed another tb or 2 of storage?

    Recommended hosts:
    Letbox, Data ideas, Hetzner

  • HiEndSoulHiEndSoul

    Nice deals

  • HiEndSoulHiEndSoul

    Nice giveaways too

  • HiEndSoulHiEndSoul

    Hope to get one <3

  • casadebamburojocasadebamburojo OG
    edited November 2022

    @servarica_hani
    Maybe I'm just missing something, but what is the valid format for the hostname when ordering? I tried domain, domain.com, and sub.domain.com, but still getting a "The hostname for your server is invalid." error. :#

    Sorry, it now cleared up. :)

  • hanahana

    Good seedboxes!

    Thanked by (1)tarasis
  • casadebamburojocasadebamburojo OG

    Order #8885431982
    Invoice #87100

    Sorry, wasn't sure which one you needed.

  • jcnjcn

    Order #5971653241

  • chimichurrichimichurri
    edited November 2022

    Hi, a couple of questions from me:

    1. About the 'legal torrent node' thing, AFAIR you run both your compute and storage on clusters. Unless this is part of your config you are unable to share publicly due to reasons, Is this legal torrent node only about compute, or are these completely separated, both compute- and storage-wise?

    Asking because I'm wondering whether ordering another service while checking this box* would result in slightly better redundancy due to having storage and/or compute on separate clusters. For the record, I do not really plan on torrenting, so if not, I guess there would be no point in taking the performance hit for nothing :tongue:

    *Optional box to be checked while ordering specific servers:

    Torrent Usage
    I will use this VPS to torrent so please place me in legal torrent node (Torrent node will have less performance than non torrent node) (If your torrent generate abuse it is not allowed )

    1. I guess it's already too late for this year's BF, so perhaps next year, please consider preparing a Polar Bear-like service with less RAM and CPU that would result in cheaper storage (per TB) than Polar Bear and Killer Whale - judging from Opossum 1/2 and Polar Bear specs/pricing, maybe something like 1C1G2T for 36 dollars annually would be feasible? :innocent: Alternatively/additionally, 2TB+ IPv6-only storage in exchange for a few dollars less per year would be nice too =)
    Thanked by (1)tarasis

    Contribute your idling VPS/dedi (link), Android (link) or iOS (link) devices to medical research

  • user123user123

    Is my name Mickey? I'm looking for that Mouse.

  • williewillie OG

    Nice, Killer Whale still seems like the most enticing offer, and it has been around for a while. If I get it on monthly, can I later switch it to annual?

  • kheng86kheng86

    All the best

  • contactwajeehcontactwajeeh OG

    Nice give away

  • LinuxLinux OG

    Nice to see more monthly payment options

  • d1m4sd1m4s

    wew, 2.5$/m 29$/y really good deal for next cloud instance or cloud backup. not bad for 100mbit unmetered .

  • DaevienDaevien OG

    order #7553479309

    Nice for a slightly offsite backup heh (i'm on fiber in montreal area)

    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9015ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.270/2.544/2.913/0.182 ms

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2022-11-22                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Sat 26 Nov 2022 04:17:09 AM EST

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 4 hours, 3 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2593.772 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 1.9 GiB
Swap       : 975.0 MiB
Disk       : 1015.7 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel     : 5.10.0-19-amd64

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 45.73 MB/s   (11.4k) | 257.40 MB/s   (4.0k)
Write      | 45.82 MB/s   (11.4k) | 258.75 MB/s   (4.0k)
Total      | 91.55 MB/s   (22.8k) | 516.15 MB/s   (8.0k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 269.93 MB/s    (527) | 261.20 MB/s    (255)
Write      | 284.27 MB/s    (555) | 278.60 MB/s    (272)
Total      | 554.21 MB/s   (1.0k) | 539.80 MB/s    (527)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 959 Mbits/sec   | 936 Mbits/sec   | 76.7 ms        
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 961 Mbits/sec   | 929 Mbits/sec   | 84.2 ms        
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 938 Mbits/sec   | 933 Mbits/sec   | 80.2 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 893 Mbits/sec   | 863 Mbits/sec   | 168 ms         
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 974 Mbits/sec   | 8.69 ms        
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 941 Mbits/sec   | 958 Mbits/sec   | 44.1 ms        
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 903 Mbits/sec   | 938 Mbits/sec   | 73.3 ms        

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 664                           
Multi Core      | 1319                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/18887941
    Thanked by (1)tylerdu
  • bdlbdl OG

  • vyasvyas OGSenpai

    Looking forward to getting a new server from them soon

    blog | exploring visually |

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Hosting ProviderOG

    @james50a said:
    Considering, but wanted to know if there was an option to expand storage ie say I bought salamander hybrid and needed another tb or 2 of storage?

    All our storage is expandable almost limit
    as all the storage is SAN as long as we have enough storage in our datacenter you can get it

    @chimichurri said:
    Hi, a couple of questions from me:

    1. About the 'legal torrent node' thing, AFAIR you run both your compute and storage on clusters. Unless this is part of your config you are unable to share publicly due to reasons, Is this legal torrent node only about compute, or are these completely separated, both compute- and storage-wise?

    Asking because I'm wondering whether ordering another service while checking this box* would result in slightly better redundancy due to having storage and/or compute on separate clusters. For the record, I do not really plan on torrenting, so if not, I guess there would be no point in taking the performance hit for nothing :tongue:

    *Optional box to be checked while ordering specific servers:

    Torrent Usage
    I will use this VPS to torrent so please place me in legal torrent node (Torrent node will have less performance than non torrent node) (If your torrent generate abuse it is not allowed )

    1. I guess it's already too late for this year's BF, so perhaps next year, please consider preparing a Polar Bear-like service with less RAM and CPU that would result in cheaper storage (per TB) than Polar Bear and Killer Whale - judging from Opossum 1/2 and Polar Bear specs/pricing, maybe something like 1C1G2T for 36 dollars annually would be feasible? :innocent: Alternatively/additionally, 2TB+ IPv6-only storage in exchange for a few dollars less per year would be nice too =)

    in our infra we have compute pools and storage SAN they are not tight to each other
    So you can have 2 VPS on in same compute pool and they user 2 different storage nodes on the SAN
    you can have 2 VPS on different compute pools and they use the same storage node on the SAN
    actually even 1 VM can have 2 disks each of them in different storage node if we want !

    usually when a user order a second or third vps we try to put them on different compute pool and different storage node than their first order but since now it is Black Friday just add it to the comment in your order to make sure no one will just accept your order in same pool

    @willie said:
    Nice, Killer Whale still seems like the most enticing offer, and it has been around for a while. If I get it on monthly, can I later switch it to annual?

    yes you can always switch

    Thanked by (5)chimichurri user123 james50a mijo tylerdu
  • wholecakewholecake

    Good luck with the offers!

  • erkerk

    From a cost-centric perspective, it really seems wasteful to be paying for the IPV4
    Especially when all the IPV4 is good for is creating SSH spam in the logs.

    Thanked by (1)Shot²
Sign In or Register to comment.

© LowEndSpirit 2024

ipv6 ready