external hdd - wd or seagate

i am looking for at 20tb external hdd.
which of the two would you recommend:

https://www.amazon.de/dp/B09TYZCN61
or
https://www.amazon.de/dp/B0B2PZWD81

and what are the reasons for your recommendation?

Comments

  • Thanked by (3)lapua vyas imok

    I believe in good luck. Harder that I work ,luckier i get.

  • edited December 22

    @lapua said:
    which of the two would you recommend:

    I checked both links, but the situation is unclear.

    Besides it's .DE (and Deutsch isn't my strong suit), the reviews are piled up — for WD they're mostly for 2.5" drives, for Seagate I found a 3.5" review, but it was for a 18 TB model.

    If you know the exact models of the external drives above, can you find out (and post here) the models of the internal drives used in those enclosures?

    Or post the external models at least.

    and what are the reasons for your recommendation?

    These days hard drives vary considerably, you're right to ask before buying.

    ☰ Probably the best Black Friday storage offersAMD EPYC VDSes with NVMe slices (ref) from 250GB to 4TB and 500GB–10TB SAN disk. / Big HDD storage VPSes (ref) from $2.42/month per TB. / Storage dedis and hybrid VPS (SSD + HDD) are there as well.

  • Honestly, they are both so similar in every aspect, it doesn't really matter.

    I personally would get the Seagate drive, but that is purely based on the fact I don't like the glossy, rounded look of the WD drive.

  • FAT32FAT32 OGSenpai

    I generally prefers WD because Seagate fail rate is high for me, but YMMV

    食之无味 弃之可惜 - Too arduous to relish, too wasteful to discard.

  • havochavoc OGContent Writer

    WD on balance, but I'd take whatever is on sale.

    Realistically with single drive you need a sound backup strategy either way.

  • edited December 22

    WD has better support and service if it ever comes to that.

  • I'd go with WD, bought a brand new Seagate Skyhawk, and it failed on me after 3 months ish, and I replaced it with a old, used WD Green that is from 2011, and it works fine, and I've had it for years now.

  • AuroraZeroAuroraZero ModeratorHosting Provider

    @FAT32 said:
    I generally prefers WD because Seagate fail rate is high for me, but YMMV

    Same and I have never had a problem RMAing a WD. Seagate has given me the run around more than once.

    Thanked by (1)FAT32

    Free Hosting at YetiNode | Cryptid Security | URL Shortener | LaunchVPS | ExtraVM | Host-C | In the Node, or Out of the Loop?

  • bikegremlinbikegremlin ModeratorOGContent Writer

    @lapua said:
    i am looking for at 20tb external hdd.
    which of the two would you recommend:

    https://www.amazon.de/dp/B09TYZCN61
    or
    https://www.amazon.de/dp/B0B2PZWD81

    and what are the reasons for your recommendation?

    It is crap. Unreliable. Especially when you need to copy all the data from the drive.

    What I did and would recommend is get an external drive bay and a Seagate Ironwolf Pro HDD of the needed size (the links are affiliate).

    Relja of House Novović, the First of His Name, King of the Plains, the Breaker of Chains, WirMach Wolves pack member
    BikeGremlin's web-hosting reviews

  • @bikegremlin said:
    Especially when you need to copy all the data from the drive.

    Filling a considerable portion of the drive with data (especially if there's some fragmented data already) could be not much better.

    Seagate Ironwolf Pro HDD

    Yes, this one is pretty good.

    Another good option is an offensively white WD (not Red, Purple, etc.), which is actually HGST (Hitachi).

    ☰ Probably the best Black Friday storage offersAMD EPYC VDSes with NVMe slices (ref) from 250GB to 4TB and 500GB–10TB SAN disk. / Big HDD storage VPSes (ref) from $2.42/month per TB. / Storage dedis and hybrid VPS (SSD + HDD) are there as well.

Sign In or Register to comment.