Debian 13 "trixie" released

2»

Comments

  • @Amadex said:

    @somik said:

    @WSS said:

    @MannDude said:
    May get brave and upgrade some Debian 12 based servers (DNS cluster)... That will be more interesting.

    Dear Lord, I gave up Debian for DNS years ago for something thinner. Any reason why you're still rocking that?

    What OS and stack do you use for DNS?

    He uses Hannah Montana linux with bind9

    Still better then using TempleOS...

    Never make the same mistake twice. There are so many new ones to make.
    It’s OK if you disagree with me. I can’t force you to be right.

  • AuroraZeroAuroraZero Hosting ProviderRetired

    @somik said:

    @Amadex said:

    @somik said:

    @WSS said:

    @MannDude said:
    May get brave and upgrade some Debian 12 based servers (DNS cluster)... That will be more interesting.

    Dear Lord, I gave up Debian for DNS years ago for something thinner. Any reason why you're still rocking that?

    What OS and stack do you use for DNS?

    He uses Hannah Montana linux with bind9

    Still better then using TempleOS...

    TempleOS still a better love story then Twilight

  • MannDudeMannDude Hosting Provider
    edited August 24

    @WSS said:

    @MannDude said:
    May get brave and upgrade some Debian 12 based servers (DNS cluster)... That will be more interesting.

    Dear Lord, I gave up Debian for DNS years ago for something thinner. Any reason why you're still rocking that?

    I'm just more familiar with it, so it's easier to maintain. What would you suggest?

    I didn't want to toss something into production (Alpine, *BSD) for DNS (though I have experimented with both a bit for private use, learning, etc) since I wasn't incredibly comfortable maintaining it. In the end went with what I know and has great documentation and resources.

    [ IncogNET LLC ] - Since 2020 [ Get dotST ]

  • We love debian since more then 10 years <3

    Thanked by (1)mizzik
  • @somik said:

    @WSS said:

    @MannDude said:
    May get brave and upgrade some Debian 12 based servers (DNS cluster)... That will be more interesting.

    Dear Lord, I gave up Debian for DNS years ago for something thinner. Any reason why you're still rocking that?

    What OS and stack do you use for DNS?

    Alpine/NSD4. I used to run OpenBSD but I got tired of maintaining it.

    My pronouns are like/subscribe.

  • @MannDude said:

    @WSS said:

    @MannDude said:
    May get brave and upgrade some Debian 12 based servers (DNS cluster)... That will be more interesting.

    Dear Lord, I gave up Debian for DNS years ago for something thinner. Any reason why you're still rocking that?

    I didn't want to toss something into production (Alpine, *BSD) for DNS (though I have experimented with both a bit for private use, learning, etc) since I wasn't incredibly comfortable maintaining it. In the end went with what I know and has great documentation and resources.

    Debian has many many more years then Alpine, but I wouldn't say alpine's resources for documentation are skint. Of course I used to run BSDs I eventually gave them up cuz it's no longer my job to maintain. I just want something that's low resources and simple enough.

    Thanked by (1)MannDude

    My pronouns are like/subscribe.

  • @WSS said:

    @somik said:

    @WSS said:

    @MannDude said:
    May get brave and upgrade some Debian 12 based servers (DNS cluster)... That will be more interesting.

    Dear Lord, I gave up Debian for DNS years ago for something thinner. Any reason why you're still rocking that?

    What OS and stack do you use for DNS?

    Alpine/NSD4. I used to run OpenBSD but I got tired of maintaining it.

    Alpine is fun to run in min specs, but once you add in all the required software and security settings, the RAM usage climbs back to a minimum debian install :(

    It's great to use on containers though, specially when it's behind a firewall!

    Never make the same mistake twice. There are so many new ones to make.
    It’s OK if you disagree with me. I can’t force you to be right.

  • @somik said:

    @WSS said:

    @somik said:

    @WSS said:

    @MannDude said:
    May get brave and upgrade some Debian 12 based servers (DNS cluster)... That will be more interesting.

    Dear Lord, I gave up Debian for DNS years ago for something thinner. Any reason why you're still rocking that?

    What OS and stack do you use for DNS?

    Alpine/NSD4. I used to run OpenBSD but I got tired of maintaining it.

    Alpine is fun to run in min specs, but once you add in all the required software and security settings, the RAM usage climbs back to a minimum debian install :(

    It's great to use on containers though, specially when it's behind a firewall!

    Ehh..

    % free -h
    total used free shared buff/cache available
    Mem: 346Mi 68Mi 77Mi 4.0Ki 211Mi 277Mi
    Swap: 475Mi 339Mi 136Mi
    %

    That's running over 200 zones with NSD4, full IPv4/v6 tables with custom settings, and sshguard. Can't remembering being able to install Debian with under 96MB required since Wheezy. Sure, this VPS has 384MB, but I managed to get it running in 64MB.

    Thanked by (1)terrorgen

    My pronouns are like/subscribe.

  • @AuroraZero said:

    @somik said:

    @Amadex said:

    @somik said:

    @WSS said:

    @MannDude said:
    May get brave and upgrade some Debian 12 based servers (DNS cluster)... That will be more interesting.

    Dear Lord, I gave up Debian for DNS years ago for something thinner. Any reason why you're still rocking that?

    What OS and stack do you use for DNS?

    He uses Hannah Montana linux with bind9

    Still better then using TempleOS...

    TempleOS still a better love story then Twilight

    Shit talking King Terry is not a great idea. VGA 640x480 is covenant.

    Thanked by (1)whoami

    My pronouns are like/subscribe.

  • AuroraZeroAuroraZero Hosting ProviderRetired

    @WSS said:

    @AuroraZero said:

    @somik said:

    @Amadex said:

    @somik said:

    @WSS said:

    @MannDude said:
    May get brave and upgrade some Debian 12 based servers (DNS cluster)... That will be more interesting.

    Dear Lord, I gave up Debian for DNS years ago for something thinner. Any reason why you're still rocking that?

    What OS and stack do you use for DNS?

    He uses Hannah Montana linux with bind9

    Still better then using TempleOS...

    TempleOS still a better love story then Twilight

    Shit talking King Terry is not a great idea. VGA 640x480 is covenant.

    You know me well enough man I will shit talk whomever I wish. I ain't skeered of noones.

  • I've started using trixie and no issues here other than the default behavior of IPv6 is to generate an EUI-64 address as well as some other type of random address. (Privacy address?)

    Wish Microsoft was a little more proactive in providing an up to date dotnet repo, but bookworm seems to work okay with trixie for .NET Runtime.

  • @WSS said:
    Ehh..

    % free -h
    total used free shared buff/cache available
    Mem: 346Mi 68Mi 77Mi 4.0Ki 211Mi 277Mi
    Swap: 475Mi 339Mi 136Mi
    %

    That's running over 200 zones with NSD4, full IPv4/v6 tables with custom settings, and sshguard. Can't remembering being able to install Debian with under 96MB required since Wheezy. Sure, this VPS has 384MB, but I managed to get it running in 64MB.

    I guess your use-case suits Alpine. I tried with nginx, php, mysql and saw the ram usage climb back to almost at debian levels.

    Ya, older debian/ubuntu were better with their resource usage... No bloat so memory usage was very low...

    Never make the same mistake twice. There are so many new ones to make.
    It’s OK if you disagree with me. I can’t force you to be right.

Sign In or Register to comment.