LES BSD Thread!

1131415161719»

Comments

  • @Crab said: Now more interesting question would be that how small you can actually make them both while still maintaining the features you really need. That will require quite a bit of trial and error with the kernel compilation parameters but could be a fun exercise.

    This is what I done for the Toshiba Click Mini but is much simpler when you target just one platform. (I can never understand why Wi-Fi drivers/modules are included in server builds.)

    Thanked by (2)Not_Oles Crab

    Than=compare;then=sequence:brought=bring;bought=buy:staffs=pile of sticks:informations/infos=no plural.
    It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away. || NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh).

  • @AlwaysSkint said:

    @Crab said: Now more interesting question would be that how small you can actually make them both while still maintaining the features you really need. That will require quite a bit of trial and error with the kernel compilation parameters but could be a fun exercise.

    This is what I done for the Toshiba Click Mini but is much simpler when you target just one platform. (I can never understand why Wi-Fi drivers/modules are included in server builds.)

    They weren't always. You used to get a basic kernel with hardware support and had to create your own config and build from there. WiFi really messed things up because hardware now isn't expected to have ethernet (or a cheap USB NIC for installation). It's possible to pare down kernels pretty extreme. I built a very base QEMU VirtIO only kernel that ran on a 64MB VPS with nearly 48MB free with full networking, thttpd and dropbear sshd. It wasn't great for much, but it did give me a place to build a compatible script for Hetrix before Virmach's monitor went insane and kept shutting it down after I got sick of fighting it and literally overwrote the entire 4GB of storage with NOPs so it'd chew through all of that before it died. Still had to beg them to remove it because I got sick of the incessant messages.

    Thanked by (1)AlwaysSkint

    My pronouns are like/subscribe.

  • ftp on NetBSD finally gets sane defaults, showing huge improvements in file transfer speeds:

    322734471 bytes retrieved in 00:14 (21.49 MiB/s)
    vs.
    322734471 bytes retrieved in 03:28 (1.47 MiB/s)

    see PR #59865 for all the details - basically, I was wondering why sysupgrade was always so slow downloading new sets, and it turned out that ftp disabled auto-sizing of the receive socket buffer (limiting the TCP receive window size).

    Thanked by (3)Not_Oles angstrom Crab
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Hosting ProviderContent Writer

    @cmeerw Another congrats! :star:

    I hope everyone gets the servers they want!

  • And talking about NetBSD, we now have an RC1 for NetBSD 11

    Thanked by (1)Not_Oles
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Hosting ProviderContent Writer
    edited February 7

    @cmeerw

    My Linveo NetBSD-current VPS is now rebuilding with patches fixing the ftp bug you found!

    From https://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=59865 :

       [ . . . ]
    Modified Files:
        src/usr.bin/ftp: cmds.c fetch.c ftp.1 ftp.c ftp_var.h main.c util.c
            version.h
      [ . . . ]  
    

    Improvements rolling in as shown by today's CVS output of my Linveo NetBSD-current VPS :

      [ . . . ]
    P usr.bin/ftp/cmds.c
    P usr.bin/ftp/fetch.c
    P usr.bin/ftp/ftp.1
    P usr.bin/ftp/ftp.c
    P usr.bin/ftp/ftp_var.h
    P usr.bin/ftp/main.c
    P usr.bin/ftp/util.c
    P usr.bin/ftp/version.h
      [ . . . ]
    

    Thanks @linveo! <3 Thanks @cmeerw! <3

    Thanked by (1)cmeerw

    I hope everyone gets the servers they want!

  • @cmeerw Excellent job! Do you know whether the Intel bug you fixed is finally mainlined into v11?

    Thanked by (1)Not_Oles
  • @Crab said:
    @cmeerw Excellent job! Do you know whether the Intel bug you fixed is finally mainlined into v11?

    I am afraid there are no updates here - probably no one else has seen that.

    Thanked by (1)Not_Oles
  • linveolinveo Hosting ProviderOG

    @cmeerw said:
    @linveo I have now built an image for NetBSD 11.0 RC1

    Thanks for the template! I have added this to our available templates as NetBSD 11 RC1 Minimum. Please give it a try and let me know how well it works.

    Thanked by (1)Not_Oles

    linveo.com | Shared Hosting | KVM VPS | Dedicated Servers

  • My daily driver is OpenBSD. I was using FreeBSD for a number of years before that.

    I host VPSs under OpenBSD's VMM. Currently only offering OpenBSD 7.8 and Debian 13.

    I haven't tested FreeBSD or NetBSD yet to see how easy it would be to support them.

    Thanked by (2)Not_Oles tmntwitw

    Slow Servers IPv6-native VPSs hosted on OpenBSD's VMM in Spokane, WA, USA. (I racked these.)
    SporeStack Resold Vultr VPS/baremetal, DigitalOcean, and a whitelabeled brand in Europe. KYC-free, simple to launch. (I didn't rack these.)
    Neither are dirt cheap!

  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Hosting ProviderContent Writer

    Hi @slowservers!

    Welcome to LES!

    I'm curious . . . may I please ask why you switched from Free to Open?

    Best wishes!

    Tom

    I hope everyone gets the servers they want!

  • @linveo said:

    @cmeerw said:
    @linveo I have now built an image for NetBSD 11.0 RC1

    Thanks for the template! I have added this to our available templates as NetBSD 11 RC1 Minimum. Please give it a try and let me know how well it works.

    Thanks, worked absolutely fine.

    Thanked by (1)Not_Oles
  • @Not_Oles said:
    Hi @slowservers!

    Welcome to LES!

    I'm curious . . . may I please ask why you switched from Free to Open?

    Best wishes!

    Tom

    Hi Tom,

    Thank you!

    I like FreeBSD a lot. I took FreeBSD kernel internals from McKusick, himself!

    FreeBSD has some weird memory management issues with Firefox. It will tend to climb and and climb from one tab to another. It did that to me for several releases.

    One of the last releases I used, my laptop wouldn't boot with 8GB of memory. I think I could override it down to 4GB (though if installing physical dims, would only boot with 2GB), but then Firefox was practically unusable. It would boot with 8GB if I disabled SMP, but disabling SMP introduced even more serious bugs. I never saw any progress on fixing these bugs and wasn't really sure where to begin, myself.

    It just ended up not being possible to use it as a daily driver, so I tried OpenBSD and haven't looked back (too often.)

    OpenBSD is definitely a bit weird in some ways, but I think it's a better overall package. For desktop use, far better. For server use, it has a nice collection of utilities and security models that mold together very nicely. OpenBSD handles Firefox much better as well.

    OpenBSD seems to be developed by more people who use it as a daily driver than FreeBSD. I do think ZFS and bhyve are very impressive, though.

    I wish it was developed with git, but overall I'm glad I switched.

    -Slow Servers

    Thanked by (1)Not_Oles

    Slow Servers IPv6-native VPSs hosted on OpenBSD's VMM in Spokane, WA, USA. (I racked these.)
    SporeStack Resold Vultr VPS/baremetal, DigitalOcean, and a whitelabeled brand in Europe. KYC-free, simple to launch. (I didn't rack these.)
    Neither are dirt cheap!

  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Hosting ProviderContent Writer

    @slowservers Thanks for the detailed reply! Now I know why you switched! 🤠

    Thanked by (1)slowservers

    I hope everyone gets the servers they want!

Sign In or Register to comment.