VPS with DDR3 RAM?
With the present RAM increases we all are seeing, where new RAM is going crazy at 2-4x or more the original pricing last year, at this point, and even refurbished RAM is going many times 1.5-2x the original prices, there's a natural doubt that both customers and (some) providers have been probably having for some time on their heads:
Seller - should I sell VPS servers with DDR3 RAM?
Customer - should I buy VPS servers with DDR3 RAM?
Well, here's your poll. As a customer, would you buy VPSes with DDR3 RAM (obviously at a lower price point than DDR4) if that guaranteed you that you'd have lower pricing, on the present continuous RAMflation context?
Let's discuss.
VPS with DDR3 RAM on DDR4 RAMflation
- Would you buy a VPS with DDR3 RAM on the present DDR4 RAMflation?23 votes
- Yes, regardless of type34.78%
- Only if it helped some special VPS types (e.g. high-RAM VPS or storage VPS) price lower47.83%
- No, not at all17.39%
Tagged:
Comments
The issue with DDR3 RAM is not necessarily the RAM generation, but the poor performance of CPUs compatible with it.
From what I recall the "newest" xeon to work with DDR3 would be E5v2 and performance of those is less than ideal when compared to modern day Xeon Golds and EPYCs.
There are plenty of customers who are just fine with their VPS running on 15 year old CPU, but others will obviously consider it outdated.
DDR3 performance is almost not a factor when paired with already old E5 processors which LE* customers are still willing to buy.
You do not even need to mention DDR3 anywhere.
OpenVPN installer | WireGuard installer
I only buy servers powered by DDR2 and specifically Atom line
If it doesn't come in SIPP format, I don't want it.
My pronouns are like/subscribe.
As someone with 3 dedicated servers with DDR3 RAMs with 3 different providers, I dont see much difference between those 3 dedicated servers and my home server with DDR4 RAM. Both works just fine for my needs.
If you want information, feign ignorance reply with the wrong answer. Internet people will correct you ASAP!
It’s OK if you disagree with me. I can’t force you to be right!
We had a brief discussion with Google AI regarding this topic.
The key points were:
Currently, we pay $80/3y for 2x EPYC 7B12 (0.5 core persistent usage), 8GB RAM, 35GB NVMe, 1500GB monthly transfer.
If you can offer 2x dedicated cores + 4x burstable cores with DDR3 RAM and match this price, it'll be an acceptable dealz.
best of "yoursunny lore" by Google AI 🤣 affbrr
100% no problem at all, 99 out of 100 use cases for anyone on this forum, you are 100% going to hit another limitation before the ram speed and capabilities are the issue in a human noticeable way that has any practical difference.
When a single wordpress plugin or a bad loop or a lazy fix in code is hit on your "whatever thing you do" can bring things down to a performance level that even PC133 DRAM can keep up with, the difference between DDR3 and 4 is not an issue.
The CPU will be the bottleneck next way before the RAM almost always.
Synthetic benchmarks wont agree, I dont care
TierHive - Hourly VPS - NAT Native - /24 per customer - Lab in the cloud - Free to try. | I am Anthony Smith
FREE tokens when you sign up, try before you buy. | Join us on Reddit
Whatever runs the computers for big banks, defence companies etc, I am okay with that vintage …
blog | exploring visually |
I love windows XP too!
TierHive - Hourly VPS - NAT Native - /24 per customer - Lab in the cloud - Free to try. | I am Anthony Smith
FREE tokens when you sign up, try before you buy. | Join us on Reddit
All of Slow Servers' hosts use DDR3. It's sufficient for many uses and certainly cheaper.
Slow Servers IPv6-native VPSs hosted on OpenBSD's VMM in Spokane, WA, USA. (I racked these.)
SporeStack Resold Vultr VPS/baremetal, DigitalOcean, and a whitelabeled brand in Europe. KYC-free, simple to launch. (I didn't rack these.)
Neither are dirt cheap!
Damn,
I always thought you were a Windows ME kind of guy. That OS was a class apart.
blog | exploring visually |
Lol 😂 my personal path was, GEOS, AmigaOS, Windows 95, Windows 98/SE, Windows ME, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Fedora Core 4, Windows 7, Debian, Windows 10, Debian.
I clung to 98SE as long as possible, and windows 2000, and XP, the rest were short lived on the way to Debian.
Debian thx.
Used many others but if it was not for over a year I don't count it.
TierHive - Hourly VPS - NAT Native - /24 per customer - Lab in the cloud - Free to try. | I am Anthony Smith
FREE tokens when you sign up, try before you buy. | Join us on Reddit
Mine was windows 95, windows 98, windows XP, Linux mint, windows 7, Ubuntu Mate, windows 10, windows 11.
My servers used to be centos 5/6/7 but then changed it to Ubuntu. Now a days they are almost always Ubuntu or debian.
If you want information, feign ignorance reply with the wrong answer. Internet people will correct you ASAP!
It’s OK if you disagree with me. I can’t force you to be right!
Genuine question, not a distro war loaded question, in what circumstances would you use Ubuntu over debian on a server, or it is just a question of what feels natural for you personally?
I always just felt like the only reason you should ever use ubuntu on a server is if you NEED ubuntu on a server.
TierHive - Hourly VPS - NAT Native - /24 per customer - Lab in the cloud - Free to try. | I am Anthony Smith
FREE tokens when you sign up, try before you buy. | Join us on Reddit
No reason. I just found Ubuntu documentations and guides more readily compared to debian when starting with Linux and that mindset stuck with me. Since I started using proxmox back in 2018, I noticed both are same. But old mindset is harder to change...
Do I need Ubuntu on my servers? No.
Debian? Maybe, but alpine would work as well, since all my dedi are on debian running proxmox. So for guest os, Ubuntu is my personal preference. That sense of familiarity.
If you want information, feign ignorance reply with the wrong answer. Internet people will correct you ASAP!
It’s OK if you disagree with me. I can’t force you to be right!
I use it because it was the only "supported" Debian distro for a mission critical piece of software. Overall, as a server it mostly feels like Debian with minor differences, but for the most part it's close enough. 22.04 LTS has been surprisingly good.
Eventually I'll have to reboot it after updating the userland, but kpatch and firewalling everything out that I don't need has been enough.
My pronouns are like/subscribe.
😂
https://www.vpsnet.com/en/services/dedicated-servers
Amadex • Hosting Forums • root.hr
I have heard that one before, then when support was needed we jumped on a call and they were like: "Oh you dont have a subscription already, oh actually, even if you did this would not be covered, we can support it though, it will be $15,000 per day though, we need a 10 day advance payment"
It is supported in the same way OVH has support, if you pay in advance, and even then, they will find a reason its not covered.
TierHive - Hourly VPS - NAT Native - /24 per customer - Lab in the cloud - Free to try. | I am Anthony Smith
FREE tokens when you sign up, try before you buy. | Join us on Reddit
Pretty bad prices, i guess power is an issue.
TierHive - Hourly VPS - NAT Native - /24 per customer - Lab in the cloud - Free to try. | I am Anthony Smith
FREE tokens when you sign up, try before you buy. | Join us on Reddit
DDR2 FBDIMM's are pretty good for cooking! What were they, 25W per module?
and 2x 146 GB SAS!
Amadex • Hosting Forums • root.hr
By "supported", I mean the package installs without missing dynamic libraries on Ubuntu 22. I know more about their Linux product than almost all of their engineers. Same for their fucking dataloggers.
My pronouns are like/subscribe.