Wolveix
Wolveix
About
- Username
- Wolveix
- Joined
- Visits
- 648
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, OG
- Thanked
- 158
- About Me:
- Head of Engineering at Global Cyber Alliance || Founder at Level Zero Technology
Comments
-
(Quote) No complaints here! Performance is my number one deciding factor for everything, and EWWW does not disappoint. (Quote) I did indeed :)
-
+1 for GeneratePress Pro & GenerateBlocks Pro. We build all of our client sites using them. They're performant, and highly customizable. I bought a lifetime license a while back. The only other thing we usually have is EWWW.io for image optimiza…
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpQ19k0L6_I
-
(Quote) Depends on your region, due to tax
-
Congrats @MichaelCee & @seriesn! I have no doubt that the brand will be looked after
-
(Quote) I don't want to derail the thread, but yeah HB/HT is more of a pub feel where as this feels like more of a commercial forum (if that makes sense). Like LET, but without the toxicity. I lurk here more than anything though hah. Onto the topic…
-
(Quote) I don't think that's their intention at all. Seems like they just didn't have API limits in-place in the past and people abused it. Their new limits are a bit light, but still seem reasonable enough to do all that you should need to do? (Qu…
-
(Quote) It was posted in March :tongue:
-
(Quote) I was using 5.11. The only thing that stood out was: SMP vm created on host with unstable TSC; guest TSC will not be reliable I ended up just recreating the server using an Intel CPU. From what I could gather from a few searches, it seems …
-
(Quote) Well shit, it was indeed using 5.4.98! Just updated, seems pretty stable so far! Thank you! Edit: Seems I spoke too soon :/ Same issue.
-
Tried out a Ryzen based node today, encountered random VM crashes (using Proxmox on the droplet). I can only assume that this is an issue with the new droplet configuration, considering that this exact same setup works just fine on the normal drople…
-
Congratulations @Mason! I hope you feel better soon @AnthonySmith :smile:
-
After comparing this to my current AX42-NVMe server, I think I'll pass. Apologies for my initial interest! I'm sure someone else will snap it up, Hetzner servers usually gain a lot of interest. I'm sure I'll regret this in a few days :sweat_smile:
-
(Quote) Well, what do you want for it? :tongue:
-
I'm assuming that's without VAT/tax? I'll probably take it off of your hands if no one else has expressed interest already :)
-
I nominate: @Mason Why: From lurking and following him a lot when he was active on LET, to working as a fellow admin alongside him on HB/HT, to meeting him and knowing him IRL. Mason is an incredible person, and I know that he would be able to brin…
-
(Quote) There's no need to have a separate key for each server. I personally keep a key per organization. For example, I have one key for all of my personal servers, one for my employer's servers, and another for my own company's servers.
-
Congrats @AnthonySmith and @Clouvider!
-
(Quote) You can still use Caddyfile syntax which has barely changed. Of course, you can also continue to use Caddy v1.
-
(Quote) If a container's IP is ever important, you should be setting it as static anyway. So unfortunately, this use-case doesn't really provide any real reason to use Traefik over Caddy. It's as simple as setting a container's IP (which can be prov…
-
(Quote) You can actually get around this by setting the VFS buffer to something low and setting the disk cache as something reasonable, though the performance is going to suffer.
-
(Quote) I already have @ChrisMiller and @Mason on mine :P Thanks though.