Looking for hourly-based NAT IPv4 VPS with at least 3 TCP & UDP forwarded ports (Check details)

ttl0

Hourly-based NAT IPv4 with root access:

• KVM or OVZ (KVM is preferred)
• At least 3 public forwarded TCP & UDP ports (including SSH)
• At least 200 Mbps network speed
• 1 vCPU
• 512 MB RAM (256 MB should work too)
• No monthly/daily/weekly contract, only hourly
• Locations, any of: US, DE, NL
• Can delete and recreate with no limits, different IPs and/or multiple locations would be a plus
• Would be a plus if I can choose my own resources

Use case:

• VPN (OpenVPN & WireGuard)
• Proxies (Dynamic SSH port forward - ssh -C -N -D options & ShadowSocks)

And to be clear from the beginning, if your service requires specific minimum for adding balance, I won't deposit +$2.

If you require any more info, please let me know (I can send an example of a service too).
Thanks.

MichaelCee

MicroNode/YetiNode may be useful. Alternatively have a look if TierHive matches your requirements.

AnthonySmith

o your budget is $2 maximum?

@MichaelCee said: Alternatively have a look if TierHive matches your requirements.

>

There is free credit without a credit card on sign up, but minimum top up os $3 also you get 2 ports (technically, you get around 500 ports, as you get a /24 but if you don't know how to port forward or use socat, then maybe it's confusing)

I was going to comment on this last night, but it almost reads like someone who tried TierHive and decided it was not right for them haha.

ttl0

@MichaelCee said: MicroNode/YetiNode may be useful. Alternatively have a look if TierHive matches your requirements.

MicroNode keeps giving me this error: "Error: It looks like you are using invalid details. Please ensure that all details are correct. Signups from a VPN or Proxy are not allowed." every time I try to register, and not sure why it's saying "VPN or Proxy are not allowed", because I'm not using any. In addition to that it asks a lot of personal information, especially phone number, why?

@AnthonySmith said: I was going to comment on this last night, but it almost reads like someone who tried TierHive and decided it was not right for them haha.

Yes, I do use TierHive at the moment, it has almost everything I want, except the number of allowed ports and the minimum top up. But these aren't really a big problem if it's my only option, that's why I'm looking for additional alternatives, also because if they ran out of business or closed, I can have an alternative ready.

AnthonySmith

@ttl0 said:

@MichaelCee said: MicroNode/YetiNode may be useful. Alternatively have a look if TierHive matches your requirements.

MicroNode keeps giving me this error: "Error: It looks like you are using invalid details. Please ensure that all details are correct. Signups from a VPN or Proxy are not allowed." every time I try to register, and not sure why it's saying "VPN or Proxy are not allowed", because I'm not using any. In addition to that it asks a lot of personal information, especially phone number, why?

@AnthonySmith said: I was going to comment on this last night, but it almost reads like someone who tried TierHive and decided it was not right for them haha.

Yes, I do use TierHive at the moment, it has almost everything I want, except the number of allowed ports and the minimum top up. But these aren't really a big problem if it's my only option, that's why I'm looking for additional alternatives, also because if they ran out of business or closed, I can have an alternative ready.

Just in case you don't know you can spin up a micro instance for more ports and just forward internally on your /24 and they only cost around $0.10 p/month.

One of the improvements we are looking into is adding more ports as an option though, still figuring out the best way to do an it.

ttl0

@AnthonySmith said: Just in case you don't know you can spin up a micro instance for more ports and just forward internally on your /24 and they only cost around $0.10 p/month.

I think I understand what you mean.

Do you mean create an additional smaller machine and forward a port from the first machine to a public forwarded port on this new machine, correct?