HOST-C General Downtime 21-SEPT-2024

host_chost_c Provider
edited September 2024 in Outages

Hy Guys,

I do not intend to use this forum as a ticket system, but since we are light on KYC, I wish to inform all customers on the General Downtime we will do.

If admins/mods think this is not the place to post this, feel free to delete the tread. :)

Thanks to your continued support, we’ve outgrown our current rack and have successfully secured two adjacent units in the data center. Unfortunately, this expansion requires us to schedule a period of general downtime. While we’d prefer not to take this route, we have no other choice, as a live migration would take weeks and severely impact performance for everyone.

We’ve been granted access to the data center on 21-SEPT-2024 to move all servers, routers, and switches.

We expect the process to take 4 to 6 hours, during which all HOST-C services will be offline.

Once the devices are set up in the new racks, we will immediately start restoring services.

General downtime is scheduled to begin on 21-SEPT-2024 at 08:00 AM Bucharest Time.

We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your understanding.

Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

“If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

«1

Comments

  • Good luck! Hope everything runs smoothly!

    dnscry.pt - Public DNSCrypt resolvers hosted by LowEnd providers • Need a free NAT LXC? -> https://microlxc.net/

  • JabJab TOP Member 2027

    @host_c said: We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your understanding.

    Good luck!

    Haven't bought a single service in VirMach Great Ryzen 2022 - 2023 Flash Sale.

  • @Jab =) =) =)

    The billions lost during that time........

    Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

    “If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King YABS 24/7/365

    MOARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • @Brueggus said: Good luck! Hope everything runs smoothly!

    it will, unless @Maverick ore someone alse will not post some sexy stuff as a reply and my 2 minions will start gazing at it for hours. =) =) =) Then we are doomed :3 =)

    Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

    “If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

  • Very professional to announce it 10 days before!
    Congrats for the expansion (but not surprising considering your prices and professionality).

    LTstats resource monitoring system | Recommended providers: Onidel, Layer7, v6node, HostBilby, Dataforest, Gigahost | AS202986

  • MichaelCeeMichaelCee ModeratorProviderOG Cymru

    Forum is the perfect place to post about this. Keep using it is my advice 😄

  • good to know! gl with your servers

  • Unacceptable sir we are losing millions here 😉
    Speaking of which will there be new deals ? Will 10tb storage make a comeback

    Want free vps ? https://microlxc.net

  • edited September 2024

    image

  • @dev_vps said:

    I almost reverted to the old perverted Yeti and posted something that would get me in trouble

    The Yeti has left the building.

  • @codelock said: Will 10tb storage make a comeback

    @host_c said a few months ago:

    @host_c said:
    :) The answer to the WHEN will come shortly.

    I promise to make things interesting on the pre-sale, with the 7USD/MO limit there is, and yes, LES will get it's 10TB Limited Exclusive deal.

    The 5TB Pioneer will come to an end on this pre-sale also. So those that got one, can consider to be among the few that have one.

    But more on this shortly.

    LTstats resource monitoring system | Recommended providers: Onidel, Layer7, v6node, HostBilby, Dataforest, Gigahost | AS202986

  • I need PB deals!

    The Yeti has left the building.

  • edited September 2024

    @host_c said:

    @Brueggus said: Good luck! Hope everything runs smoothly!

    it will, unless @Maverick ore someone alse will not post some sexy stuff as a reply and my 2 minions will start gazing at it for hours. =) =) =) Then we are doomed :3 =)

    @root has good taste in pics to. He can make u unzip before you can check who is behind you.

  • @codelock said: Speaking of which will there be new deals ? Will 10tb storage make a comeback

    yap, there will be a 10 TB comeback + others. ( we will squeeze the most in that 7 USD / MO )

    @ehab said: @root has good taste in pics to. He can make u unzip before you can check who is behind you.

    Ah boy, those 2 are now refreshing this page each minute. THX @ehab

    @AuroraZero said: I need PB deals!

    Hmmm, I see some dedis on the horizon......

    @codelock said: Unacceptable sir we are losing millions here 😉

    Yah, I know, the banking system of nice girls pics will fail for a few hours, the catastrophe.........

    @MichaelCee said: Forum is the perfect place to post about this. Keep using it is my advice 😄

    My spider-sense says...... =) =) =)

    Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

    “If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

  • rootroot OG
    edited September 2024

    Thank you for the info about downtime @host_c and allow me to wish you success on your enlargement.

  • AmadexAmadex Provider root.hr

    @host_c is the king of storage.

    But he needs a proper website! 😅

  • Congrats and good luck :)

  • @Amadex said: But he needs a proper website! 😅

    Yah, we know. :3

    Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

    “If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

  • Imma lose Billions!!!!

    The Yeti has left the building.

  • rootroot OG
    edited September 2024

    @AuroraZero said:
    Imma lose Billions!!!!

    Sir. Please open a ticket when you start losing millions, with some screenshots for us and @AuroraZero to have a proper popcorn drama.

  • @root said: Sir. Please open a ticket when you start losing millions, with some screenshots for us and @AuroraZero to have a proper popcorn drama.

    =) =) =)

    Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

    “If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

  • Good luck with the migration, happy to see some LES specials anytime soon.
    Also - pics or it didn't happen. :p

  • @benz said: Also - pics or it didn't happen. :p

    I was thinking of doing some, will post after the migration.

    Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

    “If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

  • @host_c said:

    @benz said: Also - pics or it didn't happen. :p

    I was thinking of doing some, will post after the migration.

    nude is more convincing.

  • @host_c btw 7usd limit does not apply for les exclusives deals

    Want free vps ? https://microlxc.net

  • @codelock said: @host_c btw 7usd limit does not apply for les exclusives deals

    Hmmmmmmm, does it.....................

    Let me study this for a sec..........

    Until then, we appreciate the patience you all had with us today.

    The upgrade and migration went flawless, until shit hit the fan.

    The Fabric Extender refused to communicate with the Nexus N9K we had there, so we had to take the whole RJ45 networking appart and put back the Catalyst Switch we had. This costed us little over 1our.

    Downtime was 5h to 8h for some, not proud of the later number.

    Also, customers that had services on Xeon Gold 6138 (2.0 GHz ) got a free upgrade to Xeon Gold 6148 ( 2.4 GHz )

    Xeon 6130 ( 2.1 GHz ) will follow later the next week for the Xeon Gold 6148 Upgrade.

    Xeon V4 2680 and 2660 got free upgrade to E5-2687W v4 ( 3.0 Ghz ) ( almost all nodes, 2 remained, but those will be decommissioned soon.

    We swapped out some Consumer NVME's we had and replaced it with Dell PM1725. ( I promise you, I/we will not touch another consumer NVME in PRD again, they can have the 5G/sec speed, but they wear out in 3-6 mo )

    I will post pics as promised but we still have a few tickets to reply to, until then...

    The Great Wall of G13 Storage servers from host-c

    View-recent-photos
    revoke 中文

    Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

    “If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

  • AmadexAmadex Provider root.hr
    edited September 2024
    Sat Sep 21 19:38:30 CEST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 3 hours, 19 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz
    CPU cores  : 6 @ 2394.374 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 2.0 GiB
    Disk       : 7.9 TiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-122-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Andrei Tiberiu Holt
    ASN        : AS211462 Andrei Tiberiu Holt
    Host       : Andrei Tiberiu Holt
    Location   : Oradea, Bihor County (BH)
    Country    : Romania
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sdb1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 175.98 MB/s  (43.9k) | 940.06 MB/s  (14.6k)
    Write      | 176.44 MB/s  (44.1k) | 945.01 MB/s  (14.7k)
    Total      | 352.43 MB/s  (88.1k) | 1.88 GB/s    (29.4k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 1.02 GB/s     (1.9k) | 1.03 GB/s     (1.0k)
    Write      | 1.07 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.09 GB/s     (1.0k)
    Total      | 2.09 GB/s     (4.0k) | 2.13 GB/s     (2.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 1.96 Gbits/sec  | 45.9 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 803 Mbits/sec   | 1.97 Gbits/sec  | 41.7 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 263 Mbits/sec   | 1.05 Gbits/sec  | 107 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 388 Mbits/sec   | 931 Mbits/sec   | 191 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 397 Mbits/sec   | 942 Mbits/sec   | 177 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 572 Mbits/sec   | 1.75 Gbits/sec  | 112 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 305 Mbits/sec   | 755 Mbits/sec   | 238 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 897 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 45.9 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 804 Mbits/sec   | 1.94 Gbits/sec  | 41.6 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 480 Mbits/sec   | 1.22 Gbits/sec  | 99.9 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 357 Mbits/sec   | 762 Mbits/sec   | 191 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 383 Mbits/sec   | 762 Mbits/sec   | 177 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 514 Mbits/sec   | 1.72 Gbits/sec  | 112 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 269 Mbits/sec   | 730 Mbits/sec   | 238 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 799                           
    Multi Core      | 3321                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7903421
    
    YABS completed in 15 min 7 sec
    
  • Unsuspeticle I am losing Milllions!!!!!!

    The Yeti has left the building.

  • @AuroraZero said: Unsuspeticle I am losing Milllions!!!!!!

    I swear, the first time I read this, it was: I am loosing minions. =) =)

    Unless it is Billions, don't open a ticket. B) <3

    Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

    “If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

  • host_chost_c Provider
    edited September 2024

    > @Amadex said: Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 799
    Multi Core | 3321
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7903421

    YABS completed in 15 min 7 sec

    Hmmm, wished for a 850-900 Single Score on this, but hey, the node is pretty bashed to the wall for the moment.

    At 6 cores it does scale better then a V4.

    We will see what the users say, AVX-512 extensions and the increased memory Bandwidth should translate to better overall performance compared to a V4.

    THX for the test!

    Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

    “If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

  • @host_c said:

    @AuroraZero said: Unsuspeticle I am losing Milllions!!!!!!

    I swear, the first time I read this, it was: I am loosing minions. =) =)

    Unless it is Billions, don't open a ticket. B) <3

    Hey GiB me my Minions backs!!!!

    The Yeti has left the building.

  • @AuroraZero said:

    @host_c said:

    @AuroraZero said: Unsuspeticle I am losing Milllions!!!!!!

    I swear, the first time I read this, it was: I am loosing minions. =) =)

    Unless it is Billions, don't open a ticket. B) <3

    Hey GiB me my Minions backs!!!!

    Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

    “If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

  • @host_c said:

    @AuroraZero said:

    @host_c said:

    @AuroraZero said: Unsuspeticle I am losing Milllions!!!!!!

    I swear, the first time I read this, it was: I am loosing minions. =) =)

    Unless it is Billions, don't open a ticket. B) <3

    Hey GiB me my Minions backs!!!!

    Don't make me do the summoning!!! :tongue:

    The Yeti has left the building.

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King YABS 24/7/365

    MOARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • @host_c Now that the storage wall has been built, can we get some more of them BIG fucking offers, pretty please!? :smiley:

  • edited September 2024

    Running windows server 2019 OS on storage server VPS

  • host_chost_c Provider
    edited September 2024

    As promised, here are some details on the move.

    We started out with this:

    and we had to go to here:

    during this time we also decided to upgrade a few stuff:


    As usually, we are very organized =) =)


    by the 7th hour things started to look a little better:

    And in the end, we ended up like this.

    It almost went perfectly B)

    Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

    “If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

  • @host_c said:
    As promised, here are some details on the move.

    We started out with this:
    1-old-rack

    and we had to go to here:
    2-new-rack

    during this time we also decided to upgrade a few stuff:
    cpu-swap-1
    cpu-swap-2
    Server-to-be-upgrated

    As usually, we are very organized =) =)
    the-cart
    things-flying-arround
    things-flying-arround-2

    by the 7th hour things started to look a little better:
    from-the-back

    And in the end, we ended up like this.
    front-view

    It almost went perfectly B)

    Hmm. None of the images show up

  • @localhost said: Hmm. None of the images show up

    How about now?

    Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

    “If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

  • AmadexAmadex Provider root.hr
  • @host_c gpt email about cpu upgrade, if you could share yabs it would be more helpful for people to decide

    Want free vps ? https://microlxc.net

  • @codelock said:
    @host_c gpt email about cpu upgrade, if you could share yabs it would be more helpful for people to decide

    Don't expect miracles purely CPU-wise, a few percents maybe. The benefit might come from the greater memory bandwidth and new cpu instructions... if your software make use of it.

    Happy customer at AlexHost, AxusHost, Bakker-IT, Host-C, Ionos, Veesp + NanoKVM ftw.

  • @codelock said:
    @host_c gpt email about cpu upgrade, if you could share yabs it would be more helpful for people to decide

    root@serv4:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Sep 24 16:55:03 UTC 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 3 days, 2 hours, 37 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2394.374 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 19.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-25-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Andrei Tiberiu Holt
    ASN        : AS211462 Andrei Tiberiu Holt
    Host       : Andrei Tiberiu Holt
    Location   : Oradea, Bihor County (BH)
    Country    : Romania
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 171.02 MB/s  (42.7k) | 919.40 MB/s  (14.3k)
    Write      | 171.47 MB/s  (42.8k) | 924.24 MB/s  (14.4k)
    Total      | 342.50 MB/s  (85.6k) | 1.84 GB/s    (28.8k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 946.21 MB/s   (1.8k) | 930.56 MB/s    (908)
    Write      | 996.49 MB/s   (1.9k) | 992.54 MB/s    (969)
    Total      | 1.94 GB/s     (3.7k) | 1.92 GB/s     (1.8k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 740 Mbits/sec   | 988 Mbits/sec   | 42.8 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 616 Mbits/sec   | 986 Mbits/sec   | 26.9 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 245 Mbits/sec   | 937 Mbits/sec   | 96.6 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 287 Mbits/sec   | 882 Mbits/sec   | 179 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 297 Mbits/sec   | 894 Mbits/sec   | 162 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 394 Mbits/sec   | 935 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 216 Mbits/sec   | 732 Mbits/sec   | 226 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 656 Mbits/sec   | 973 Mbits/sec   | 42.8 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 701 Mbits/sec   | 974 Mbits/sec   | 26.2 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 262 Mbits/sec   | 928 Mbits/sec   | 96.3 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 290 Mbits/sec   | 866 Mbits/sec   | 179 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 351 Mbits/sec   | 867 Mbits/sec   | 161 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 353 Mbits/sec   | 925 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 191 Mbits/sec   | 713 Mbits/sec   | 226 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 783                           
    Multi Core      | 1386                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7958331
    
    YABS completed in 17 min 17 sec
    
  • host_chost_c Provider
    edited September 2024

    @codelock said: @host_c gpt email about cpu upgrade, if you could share yabs it would be more helpful for people to decide

    True, so here it is:

    From @mikewazar

    Xeon Gold 6148 @ 2.4 GHz

    Single Core     | 783                           
    Multi Core      | 1386                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7958331
    

    Xeon E5-2687W V4 @ 3.0 GHz

    Single Core     | 992
    Multi Core      | 1708
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7961122
    

    Xeon CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz

    Single Core     | 818
    Multi Core      | 1477
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7961353
    

    So higher CPU Clock beats Newer Gen with lower CPU Clock in Synthetic Benchmark.

    Synthetic tests show only one part of the a performance aspect. The newer the CPU, the newer the Chipset, more modern storage controllers, lower latencies, and so on.
    Even if each of those brings 1%, all added up the final product should be better.

    Now, if I run something that will make no use of the newer features, then yes, an upgrade like this makes no sense.

    For me personally, when I moved my PLEX server from Xeon E5-2687W V4 @ 3.0 GHz to a Xeon Gold 6130 @ 2.1 GHz I saw better performance trans-coding 4K and the over-all VPS worked much faster. SQL Database on the other hand was slower due to the lower CPU Clock.

    The two Xeon V4 yabs test I used:

    YABS - Xeon E5-2687W V4 @ 3.0 GHz

    root@test:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Sep 24 20:29:37 UTC 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2999.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 19.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-25-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Andrei Tiberiu Holt
    ASN        : AS211462 Andrei Tiberiu Holt
    Host       : Host C
    Location   : Oradea, Bihor County (BH)
    Country    : Romania
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 212.88 MB/s  (53.2k) | 450.88 MB/s   (7.0k)
    Write      | 213.44 MB/s  (53.3k) | 453.25 MB/s   (7.0k)
    Total      | 426.33 MB/s (106.5k) | 904.13 MB/s  (14.1k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 763.97 MB/s   (1.4k) | 968.30 MB/s    (945)
    Write      | 804.57 MB/s   (1.5k) | 1.03 GB/s     (1.0k)
    Total      | 1.56 GB/s     (3.0k) | 2.00 GB/s     (1.9k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.19 Gbits/sec  | 1.88 Gbits/sec  | 31.6 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.31 Gbits/sec  | 4.97 Gbits/sec  | 31.6 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 2.13 Gbits/sec  | 1.25 Gbits/sec  | 98.5 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 967 Mbits/sec   | 176 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 927 Mbits/sec   | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 162 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.81 Gbits/sec  | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 108 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 748 Mbits/sec   | 731 Mbits/sec   | 220 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 992
    Multi Core      | 1708
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7961122
    
    YABS completed in 13 min 31 sec
    

    YABS - Xeon CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz

    root@test:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Sep 24 20:48:09 UTC 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2599.996 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 19.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-25-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Andrei Tiberiu Holt
    ASN        : AS211462 Andrei Tiberiu Holt
    Host       : Host C
    Location   : Oradea, Bihor County (BH)
    Country    : Romania
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 98.99 MB/s   (24.7k) | 915.38 MB/s  (14.3k)
    Write      | 99.25 MB/s   (24.8k) | 920.19 MB/s  (14.3k)
    Total      | 198.25 MB/s  (49.5k) | 1.83 GB/s    (28.6k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 2.35 GB/s     (4.6k) | 810.53 MB/s    (791)
    Write      | 2.48 GB/s     (4.8k) | 864.51 MB/s    (844)
    Total      | 4.84 GB/s     (9.4k) | 1.67 GB/s     (1.6k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 3.00 Gbits/sec  | 4.92 Gbits/sec  | 31.6 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 4.42 Gbits/sec  | 4.48 Gbits/sec  | 31.9 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 2.23 Gbits/sec  | 1.53 Gbits/sec  | 98.7 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.13 Gbits/sec  | 978 Mbits/sec   | 176 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 945 Mbits/sec   | 971 Mbits/sec   | 163 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.75 Gbits/sec  | 1.63 Gbits/sec  | 108 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 868 Mbits/sec   | 747 Mbits/sec   | 220 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 818
    Multi Core      | 1477
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7961353
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 18 sec
    

    Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

    “If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

  • @tetech said:
    hostc.png

    works for me rn

  • tetechtetech OG
    edited September 2024

    @mikewazar said:

    @tetech said:
    hostc.png

    works for me rn

    With or without www?

    $ echo | openssl s_client -showcerts -servername host-c.com -connect host-c.com:443 2>/dev/null | openssl x509 -inform pem -noout -text
    Certificate:
        Data:
            Version: 3 (0x2)
            Serial Number: 29421 (0x72ed)
            Signature Algorithm: sha256WithRSAEncryption
            Issuer: C = --, ST = SomeState, L = SomeCity, O = SomeOrganization, OU = SomeOrganizationalUnit, CN = localhost.localdomain, emailAddress = [email protected]
            Validity
                Not Before: Jan 17 11:40:32 2022 GMT
                Not After : Jan 17 11:40:32 2023 GMT
            Subject: C = --, ST = SomeState, L = SomeCity, O = SomeOrganization, OU = SomeOrganizationalUnit, CN = localhost.localdomain, emailAddress = [email protected]
            Subject Public Key Info:
                Public Key Algorithm: rsaEncryption
                    RSA Public-Key: (2048 bit)
                    Modulus:
                        00:bb:0d:dd:b4:10:be:fe:2a:f6:85:bd:4b:99:55:
                        14:e7:8d:cb:8d:d3:c8:cf:0f:05:3b:ab:9e:ce:c5:
                        58:2d:6b:24:14:f7:1a:51:09:dc:c9:ab:b0:c2:dc:
                        f9:d8:b4:72:60:e8:52:88:e6:54:23:34:1e:db:24:
                        b7:b0:b7:ae:39:8c:66:38:db:41:a3:fe:08:9f:7c:
                        15:32:94:ef:ab:01:f0:2a:8b:b1:db:ec:c2:cb:e6:
                        fc:72:a1:fc:2b:3d:f0:60:81:ef:73:37:62:d9:7b:
                        0e:35:3b:48:19:37:af:8f:a7:6a:eb:50:59:a7:22:
                        ad:a6:54:bb:80:6a:bd:7e:0a:ce:4a:5e:33:5f:7a:
                        4e:f8:8f:31:20:64:74:3e:a3:71:43:3e:24:ce:c6:
                        51:88:e8:7b:63:dd:14:ca:d7:75:b9:fa:e6:69:0d:
                        0c:c5:27:cf:2e:0b:4d:12:f9:3d:1e:dd:67:45:78:
                        1b:fe:56:a8:45:10:1b:59:1e:20:4f:86:61:ca:e8:
                        3c:e4:9e:ce:2f:cf:0a:74:88:45:49:14:65:35:70:
                        a0:22:2b:eb:9e:40:2a:ce:1a:10:17:22:6a:df:0e:
                        9e:05:aa:aa:18:9e:41:98:e9:e2:0f:e4:4b:04:d7:
                        3f:07:c7:0b:19:5e:f0:e9:92:4f:05:df:96:8b:3b:
                        ba:6b
                    Exponent: 65537 (0x10001)
            X509v3 extensions:
                X509v3 Basic Constraints:
                    CA:FALSE
                X509v3 Key Usage:
                    Digital Signature, Non Repudiation, Key Encipherment
        Signature Algorithm: sha256WithRSAEncryption
             3e:6c:32:f8:30:ab:42:e8:89:3b:ec:41:9a:09:cf:9c:6a:ac:
             82:9f:8d:5e:5d:65:21:f1:39:3b:5a:3c:db:3f:57:83:3f:7e:
             97:64:50:f1:94:68:40:fe:6b:90:6c:4c:1a:d6:9b:01:73:cf:
             43:3b:57:66:ec:fc:a0:78:e7:38:85:f7:5d:27:e2:c9:dc:f0:
             79:dd:1a:a0:34:84:3f:35:77:54:0d:7a:ad:b5:79:c8:25:19:
             e0:4e:8a:05:66:57:c0:93:fc:64:1a:30:54:e9:2b:5e:84:e8:
             b2:2b:29:70:e5:a3:7d:ba:7b:10:f6:13:3e:01:68:25:6b:28:
             47:d4:71:8c:9e:74:38:bb:15:d5:8b:1c:63:75:49:85:8c:6b:
             1e:00:7b:d9:52:a4:87:26:d9:27:f4:a6:c5:d5:2d:f8:11:87:
             a3:14:c5:e0:38:2f:29:cf:cf:d0:c0:13:98:26:b3:2d:9a:e5:
             07:4c:fc:a3:79:81:88:48:2d:66:13:60:f2:9c:11:f0:a0:24:
             75:1f:e4:dd:20:7b:78:97:71:12:a2:9d:79:7f:0c:a2:3b:32:
             f4:90:6d:ad:16:bc:35:fc:14:39:3e:84:df:e7:71:61:00:98:
             0e:f2:7f:d8:85:82:c9:b6:73:7d:ee:30:9f:24:b4:0a:72:b9:
             18:14:2b:fa
    
  • @tetech said: With or without www?

    I see we have a redirect issue from host-c.com to www.host-c.com.

    I will put someone to look into it.

    Host-C | Storage by Design | AS211462

    “If it can’t guarantee behavior under load, it doesn’t belong in production.”

Sign In or Register to comment.