thank god you can rely on the community here. i have now transferred my hard-earned finnmark to another provider. https://www.worldstream.com is really very stable.
Some general statements for both sides of community:
LES isn't LET, we don't ban people just cause they're banned on LET
We discourage trashing offer posts just "for the sake of it" and encourage customers to leave their own reviews (although much of the discussion here is justified IMO)
Mods are people with lives too, and flagging posts for no real reason is a bit shitty, try to only flag stuff with substance
Do I personally approve of this brand? No
Do I see any legitimate reason to ban them right now? It's debatable, but not really
Do I see them continuing with posting offers? I doubt it
@MichaelCee said:
Some general statements for both sides of community:
LES isn't LET, we don't ban people just cause they're banned on LET
We discourage trashing offer posts just "for the sake of it" and encourage customers to leave their own reviews (although much of the discussion here is justified IMO)
Mods are people with lives too, and flagging posts for no real reason is a bit shitty, try to only flag stuff with substance
Do I personally approve of this brand? No
Do I see any legitimate reason to ban them right now? It's debatable, but not really
Do I see them continuing with posting offers? I doubt it
No offence but like in this case it’s known that the provider isn’t reliable, shouldn’t some proactive actions be taken?
I guess this comment with the rule didn’t age well either.
I remember one of the providers here making a post for a free three month vps. I asked for the renewal pricing and they gave me a number. I posted that in the thread. One of the mods deleted those and moved it to cess pit since the offer was for a free vps only.
It’s the old saying in my country - just because the pigeon decides to close its eyes doesn’t mean the cat isn’t about to fucking pounce and eat it.
@MichaelCee said:
Some general statements for both sides of community:
LES isn't LET, we don't ban people just cause they're banned on LET
We discourage trashing offer posts just "for the sake of it" and encourage customers to leave their own reviews (although much of the discussion here is justified IMO)
Mods are people with lives too, and flagging posts for no real reason is a bit shitty, try to only flag stuff with substance
Do I personally approve of this brand? No
Do I see any legitimate reason to ban them right now? It's debatable, but not really
Do I see them continuing with posting offers? I doubt it
No offence but like in this case it’s known that the provider isn’t reliable, shouldn’t some proactive actions be taken?
I guess this comment with the rule didn’t age well either.
I remember one of the providers here making a post for a free three month vps. I asked for the renewal pricing and they gave me a number. I posted that in the thread. One of the mods deleted those and moved it to cess pit since the offer was for a free vps only.
It’s the old saying in my country - just because the pigeon decides to close its eyes doesn’t mean the cat isn’t about to fucking pounce and eat it.
It's a buyer beware market. If a host breaks a rule, actions are enforced. If you believe a rule has been broken, report it.
Like I said, we probably don't need to take action - they likely aren't going to return to posting offers.
@MichaelCee said:
Some general statements for both sides of community:
LES isn't LET, we don't ban people just cause they're banned on LET
We discourage trashing offer posts just "for the sake of it" and encourage customers to leave their own reviews (although much of the discussion here is justified IMO)
Mods are people with lives too, and flagging posts for no real reason is a bit shitty, try to only flag stuff with substance
Do I personally approve of this brand? No
Do I see any legitimate reason to ban them right now? It's debatable, but not really
Do I see them continuing with posting offers? I doubt it
No offence but like in this case it’s known that the provider isn’t reliable, shouldn’t some proactive actions be taken?
I guess this comment with the rule didn’t age well either.
I remember one of the providers here making a post for a free three month vps. I asked for the renewal pricing and they gave me a number. I posted that in the thread. One of the mods deleted those and moved it to cess pit since the offer was for a free vps only.
It’s the old saying in my country - just because the pigeon decides to close its eyes doesn’t mean the cat isn’t about to fucking pounce and eat it.
It's a buyer beware market. If a host breaks a rule, actions are enforced. If you believe a rule has been broken, report it.
Like I said, we probably don't need to take action - they likely aren't going to return to posting offers.
At least not under CH name. They'll probably buy a second hand domain and open a new hosting company pretending to be a old and reliable host...
And @TheDP is to blame for the sale of the domain!
@MichaelCee said:
Some general statements for both sides of community:
LES isn't LET, we don't ban people just cause they're banned on LET
We discourage trashing offer posts just "for the sake of it" and encourage customers to leave their own reviews (although much of the discussion here is justified IMO)
Mods are people with lives too, and flagging posts for no real reason is a bit shitty, try to only flag stuff with substance
Do I personally approve of this brand? No
Do I see any legitimate reason to ban them right now? It's debatable, but not really
Do I see them continuing with posting offers? I doubt it
No offence but like in this case it’s known that the provider isn’t reliable, shouldn’t some proactive actions be taken?
I guess this comment with the rule didn’t age well either.
I remember one of the providers here making a post for a free three month vps. I asked for the renewal pricing and they gave me a number. I posted that in the thread. One of the mods deleted those and moved it to cess pit since the offer was for a free vps only.
It’s the old saying in my country - just because the pigeon decides to close its eyes doesn’t mean the cat isn’t about to fucking pounce and eat it.
It's a buyer beware market. If a host breaks a rule, actions are enforced. If you believe a rule has been broken, report it.
Like I said, we probably don't need to take action - they likely aren't going to return to posting offers.
At least not under CH name. They'll probably buy a second hand domain and open a new hosting company pretending to be a old and reliable host...
And @TheDP is to blame for the sale of the domain!
If I'm not mistaken, CH is already this company's second name.
Comments
They haven't misbehaved here, although it's just a matter of time.
vps9hostname is available. affbrrProud moment.
Nodeseek is not taking their BS either.
I'm assuming the ban was (at least partially) for paying people to leave 5* TrustPilot reviews, more than specific on-forum misbehaviour.
Oh, his forum misbehavior was certainly a factor. He was spamming rabidly and insulting other members.
thank god you can rely on the community here. i have now transferred my hard-earned finnmark to another provider. https://www.worldstream.com is really very stable.
Good choice, only downside is price increases sometimes. Unless you have a contract with them.
Lmao
money doesn't matter. finnmark are constantly on the rise.
Some general statements for both sides of community:
Do I personally approve of this brand? No
Do I see any legitimate reason to ban them right now? It's debatable, but not really
Do I see them continuing with posting offers? I doubt it
Michael from DragonWebHost & OnePoundEmail
Am I late for the party? Beating a dead rat could not be more fun 😊
No offence but like in this case it’s known that the provider isn’t reliable, shouldn’t some proactive actions be taken?
I guess this comment with the rule didn’t age well either.
https://lowendspirit.com/discussion/comment/191386/#Comment_191386
I remember one of the providers here making a post for a free three month vps. I asked for the renewal pricing and they gave me a number. I posted that in the thread. One of the mods deleted those and moved it to cess pit since the offer was for a free vps only.
It’s the old saying in my country - just because the pigeon decides to close its eyes doesn’t mean the cat isn’t about to fucking pounce and eat it.
Team push-ups!
It's a buyer beware market. If a host breaks a rule, actions are enforced. If you believe a rule has been broken, report it.
Like I said, we probably don't need to take action - they likely aren't going to return to posting offers.
Michael from DragonWebHost & OnePoundEmail
At least not under CH name. They'll probably buy a second hand domain and open a new hosting company pretending to be a old and reliable host...
And @TheDP is to blame for the sale of the domain!
Never make the same mistake twice. There are so many new ones to make.
It’s OK if you disagree with me. I can’t force you to be right.
If I'm not mistaken, CH is already this company's second name.
An apology goes a long way, just saying..
datalix's aff #1 fan
he can keep it for himself. no longer necessary
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
Ya, I dont think he care about people enough to do that anyway. All he wants is money.
Never make the same mistake twice. There are so many new ones to make.
It’s OK if you disagree with me. I can’t force you to be right.