const priceCriteria = priceAsFloat <= parseFloat($('#price_n').val()) || 100;
This evaluates to true in any case, it would most likely work if you remove the || 100.
Thanks for the help. Yeah, it must have been put in there for debugging something else and then forgot to take it out. Also it does look like it's equal or greater than (I guess I updated it to that and forgot, so tooltips do make sense as does debugging), so if you find the issue with the IP let me know, otherwise I'll have a look in a few moments.
The IP count seems to be missing, so it defaults to 0:
const ips = data.ips || 0; // Default to 0 if undefined
I remember now.
I was supposed to take out the IP count from the notifications, that's why it doesn't appear on the card. I don't know to what level I removed it. Added back, I think. Just so we don't break it if you put 1.
@Decicus said:
Is it intentional that the "view thread" link on the site leads to the other thread and not this one?
Not intentional but that's pretty funny because I waited until after I posted this thread so I could grab the link and put it in, only to put in the complain thread.
@imok said: @VirMach i'm ok with those prices and I'd go with Amsterdam. Thanks for the extra discount. The only issue would be the contract term. I was thinking in monthly, but 6-month would be fine. I'm not sure if I would need it more than that time TBH.
Let's do 6 months and I can keep it the same price/duration ratio. Otherwise I'd have to bump it up. I mean I guess I don't have to since I own the company, but there's probably some internal policy where I shouldn't. Send me your email via DM to generate. If you end up not using it, I can refund to store credit once you're done if you remind me (assuming you have any other services left?)
@VirMach said: I remember now.
I was supposed to take out the IP count from the notifications, that's why it doesn't appear on the card. I don't know to what level I removed it. Added back, I think. Just so we don't break it if you put 1.
If I understand the code right, the only problem was with the "Test" button, there the IP count is simply not saved in the data array:
The "real" notifications hadn't had that problem as the data from the server (including the IP) is directly passed to handleNotification.
Edit: I don't know what you fixed, but I don't think it was (directly) related to this, as the IP count was sent by the server, otherwise it couldn't have been displayed.
@imok said: @VirMach i'm ok with those prices and I'd go with Amsterdam. Thanks for the extra discount. The only issue would be the contract term. I was thinking in monthly, but 6-month would be fine. I'm not sure if I would need it more than that time TBH.
Let's do 6 months and I can keep it the same price/duration ratio. Otherwise I'd have to bump it up. I mean I guess I don't have to since I own the company, but there's probably some internal policy where I shouldn't. Send me your email via DM to generate. If you end up not using it, I can refund to store credit once you're done if you remind me (assuming you have any other services left?)
@VirMach said: I remember now.
I was supposed to take out the IP count from the notifications, that's why it doesn't appear on the card. I don't know to what level I removed it. Added back, I think. Just so we don't break it if you put 1.
If I understand the code right, the only problem was with the "Test" button, there the IP count is simply not saved in the data array:
The "real" notifications hadn't had that problem as the data from the server (including the IP) is directly passed to handleNotification.
Edit: I don't know what you fixed, but I don't think it was (directly) related to this, as the IP count was sent by the server, otherwise it couldn't have been displayed.
Test button uses the same handler as real notifications, but it doesn't grab the IP data. I've fixed the test button as well now.
@VirMach said: Bug located, thankfully it was stupidly simple. When reworking the creation system I turned it into different clusters and focused on improving bulk creations across different clusters of plans. Unfortunately while doing that, the logic got out of sync and the debugging wrote everything out in a way that made it seem like it was doing it in the correct order in some situations. This should be fixed. Going through and manually updating any leftovers.
Bug unlocated. It wasn't this, it's something else. (edit) Bug un-unlocated. It was the same thing as above but with a few extra hoops. Let's see if it plays out.
No. Nowhere does officially until we finish with our system to manage it (in the works.) But highest likelihood in the near future in Amsterdam, Tokyo, followed by Los Angeles, and NYC. Keep in mind I've probably said this two years ago and it's still not done so I wouldn't trust us if you need IPv6.
@VirMach said: I thought of making a bug bounty program but I figured that'd bankrupt us, plus getting it fixed for your service is prize enough
Wow thats cruel, appreciate it is beta but buying something and not getting what you paid for seems a bit off (I am sure you did not mean it that way).
I have placed an order for:
VIRT KVM
RYZEN SKU# V01-XD
1280MB DDR4 RAM
2 Core CPU vCORE
40GB SSD (NVMe)
2816GB BANDWIDTH
1 IPv4
But I got:
500MB RAM
1 Core CPU vCORE
10GB SSD (NVMe)
500GB BANDWIDTH
Perhaps you should fix it. invoice #1661028
Any discount code for ^ this plan with biennial purchase?
I would rather lock in a price for the longer 2 year term.
I believe biennially already has a pretty steep discount on those plans for some reason, so maybe 30% off would be the sweet spot where it's a little cheaper than annual.
Comments
I remember now.
I was supposed to take out the IP count from the notifications, that's why it doesn't appear on the card. I don't know to what level I removed it. Added back, I think. Just so we don't break it if you put 1.
Not intentional but that's pretty funny because I waited until after I posted this thread so I could grab the link and put it in, only to put in the complain thread.
Let's do 6 months and I can keep it the same price/duration ratio. Otherwise I'd have to bump it up. I mean I guess I don't have to since I own the company, but there's probably some internal policy where I shouldn't. Send me your email via DM to generate. If you end up not using it, I can refund to store credit once you're done if you remind me (assuming you have any other services left?)
If I understand the code right, the only problem was with the "Test" button, there the IP count is simply not saved in the data array:
The "real" notifications hadn't had that problem as the data from the server (including the IP) is directly passed to
handleNotification.Edit: I don't know what you fixed, but I don't think it was (directly) related to this, as the IP count was sent by the server, otherwise it couldn't have been displayed.
cpu_logger | Recommended providers: Layer7, dataforest (Avoro/PHP-Friends), @host_c
Awesome. Thank you!
Viva Virmach!
Test button uses the same handler as real notifications, but it doesn't grab the IP data. I've fixed the test button as well now.
Bug unlocated. It wasn't this, it's something else. (edit) Bug un-unlocated. It was the same thing as above but with a few extra hoops. Let's see if it plays out.
New bug, welcome emails not sending.
NaNh NaNm NaNs
Two Questions:
Is VirMach American based?
SJC location, does it have IPv6?
Yes.
No. Nowhere does officially until we finish with our system to manage it (in the works.) But highest likelihood in the near future in Amsterdam, Tokyo, followed by Los Angeles, and NYC. Keep in mind I've probably said this two years ago and it's still not done so I wouldn't trust us if you need IPv6.
Nice! I now have a 4TB server!
YABS?
Wow thats cruel, appreciate it is beta but buying something and not getting what you paid for seems a bit off (I am sure you did not mean it that way).
Incase anyone wants a YABS - although likely everyone will be different.....
I need L.A badly....
I pressed the "Request" button to set a custom ISO and it failed (without any notice in the UI).
I thought it was an automated process but it opened a ticket instead.
@VirMach Actions that are going to trigger a ticket should be labeled. Or maybe I'm bad at English.
EDIT: Ok it seems I will have to proceed with the ticket way.
@VirMach, discount code please..
Not sure what you're requesting.
Yeah we're on the same page, the entire client area needs a rework.
https://vps.blackfriday/ kaput ( back again )
@VirMach, 50% dis. code possible?
Raise up the pricing by 100% and issue a whooping 50% discount back.
This is the [BF] way
I have placed an order for:
VIRT KVM
RYZEN SKU# V01-XD
1280MB DDR4 RAM
2 Core CPU vCORE
40GB SSD (NVMe)
2816GB BANDWIDTH
1 IPv4
But I got:
500MB RAM
1 Core CPU vCORE
10GB SSD (NVMe)
500GB BANDWIDTH
Perhaps you should fix it. invoice #1661028
Others maybe, but @VirMach doesn't do that sort of crap.
Need refugee offer for two providers that are deadpooling in next few months.
CB-3G
2 cores
3072 MB RAM
25 GB SSD
4096 GB on 1 Gbps port
BGP session included
$11.69/year
competitor billing panel
MN-512
1 core
512 MB RAM
20 GB SSD
2000 GB on 100 Mbps port
£5/year
competitor billing panel
Accepting submissions for IPv6 less than /64 Hall of Incompetence.
I see now
Any discount code for ^ this plan with biennial purchase?
I would rather lock in a price for the longer 2 year term.
I believe biennially already has a pretty steep discount on those plans for some reason, so maybe 30% off would be the sweet spot where it's a little cheaper than annual.
Code 2024BFHDD2
30% off --> $25.20/2YR
ohh no incoming dramas..