angstrom
angstrom
About
- Username
- angstrom
- Joined
- Visits
- 11,450
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, OG
- Thanked
- 1227
Comments
-
(Quote) @Not_Oles , I'm afraid that I don't have a ready answer to this question. As I said earlier, I've never tried to build modular-xorg, so I don't have a good sense of how all of the dependencies are structured. In order to obtain an answer to …
-
(Quote) If it's twm that you're after, twm is in the base distribution :)
-
(Quote) I sometimes need (or prefer) to delete all of the pkgsrc binaries in order to start afresh, and the following command does this quickly: # pkg_delete -ff '*-*' As you yourself have experienced, pkgsrc current -- but even pkgsrc stable -- c…
-
(Quote) I was surprised when you said that the build succeeded as recently as the end of October, but I didn't want to question you on this :) (Quote) Yes, as I said above, it's a dependency of the meta-package "modular-xorg-drivers" (Qu…
-
(Quote) What is the Yeti stepping down from?
-
(Quote) I'm a long-term NetBSD user -- but not exclusively NetBSD -- but I don't like living on the edge, ;) so I've always just used NetBSD stable (now: 10.1) and pkgsrc stable I confess that I've never tried to build modular-xorg, largely becaus…
-
Okay (Was there a question?)
-
(Quote) I think that I've found the relevant Makefile: https://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/meta-pkgs/modular-xorg-drivers/Makefile You could try commenting out the line DEPENDS+= xf86-video-openchrome-[0-9]*:../../x11/xf86-video-op…
-
@Not_Oles , you seem to like living on the edge :) Any reason why you're trying to build modular-xorg?
-
(Quote) Right, if you don't have that chipset, then the best strategy would be to avoid trying to build it :) By the way, it appears that this package hasn't been built for any of architectures that NetBSD supports: https://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgs…
-
(Quote) Unfortunately, I don't have the answer to your question, but you might try asking on the NetBSD mailing list "pkgsrc-users": https://netbsd.org/mailinglists/#pkgsrc-users In the past, I sometimes wrote to this list when I had an …
-
(Quote) With the default signature font size, one line of signature is basically <=170 characters (Quote) No (Quote) Do you see all these other users with the signature size that you had?
-
(Quote) A line isn't defined by use of the <br> tag! (Quote) It's not okay
-
(Quote) I would add that as far as I can tell, The Good Cloud web site isn't trying to dazzle anyone with a slick design, but I tend to see this as a positive feature :)
-
(Quote) I'd agree that the "structure" of the site leaves something to be desired, but I guess that I'm willing to overlook this (unless they're really trying to hide something crucial) Since their only product is managed Nextcloud, they …
-
(Quote) In the past, I considered Hetzner's managed Nextcloud a couple of times, but in the end, I decided to manage my own installations. That said, Hetzner's prices seem good for what you get Around a month ago, mainly because I was curious, I si…
-
I've been running a couple of Nextcloud installations for a number of years now, but I run them on VPSes As your report suggests, it can be tricky to run Nextcloud on shared hosting, but this also depends on how much "freedom" one's share…
-
As far as I can tell, the OSS version is no longer supported or encouraged by Higher Logic, which is the company that now owns Vanilla (now called "Higher Logic Vanilla"). The web site makes no mention of the OSS version (unless I've misse…
-
(Quote) Just curious: why not use the latest OSS version, which is OSS Release 2025.010 (LTS 2)? See https://github.com/vanilla/vanilla/releases
-
(Quote) Holy necro
-
(Quote) I've never used Betterbird, but it's based on Thunderbird ESR
-
(Quote) Indeed, it seems like a regression I suspect that the latest Extended Support Release version (from July 7th) wouldn't have this bug: https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/140.0esr/releasenotes/ In any case, if I were an otherwise…
-
(Quote) Just wondering whether this restriction is documented somewhere. I don't necessarily doubt what you say, but it seems like a very odd restriction, almost like a bug
-
@HostSlick was last active here on June 7th and their last post dates from January 21st For what it's worth, their provider tag on OGF was suspended some days ago
-
(Quote) Holy necro OnePoundEmail have a decent knowledgebase: https://my.onepoundemail.co.uk/plugin/support_manager/knowledgebase No congrats on your second post
-
"mail archiving system"? (I'm waiting for someone to say that real women and men live in the moment -- ain't got no time or need for a mail archiving system =) )
-
(Quote) I'm sure what a " 'proper' forum" is, but setting this aside, if what you mean is a forum-A user who behaves abusively towards a provider on forum A, then yes, action should be taken against this user on forum A, but for this, one …
-
If you mean a user/provider with a transparent/constant username who signs up on a forum and spams, it doesn't follow that the same user/provider with the same username who signs up on another forum will also spam on that other forum In general, fo…
-
Perhaps I'm missing something, but given that a user who signs up on a forum (e.g., on LES or OGF) can choose an arbitrary username and give a throw-away email address, how could they be reliably identified?
-
Realtox Media, BF Special 1 (1 vCPU, 1 GB RAM, 25 GB SSD) (Needed to create a 1GB swap file beforehand for Geekbench 6) # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## Yet-Another-Bench-Script ## …