msatt
msatt
About
- Username
- msatt
- Joined
- Visits
- 5,036
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Hosting Provider, OG
- Thanked
- 399
Comments
-
As far as I am concerned @AGXL your site and its many options are very good. I have no idea who @GoMaKe is, or your relationship but my advice would be keep going and you have my support (in the PM).
-
If you are happy with Proxmox, you can login using your vmid and originally assigned password at https://cpanel-de1.fossvps.org/ (make sure realm is set to PVE not linux). You can reboot and use vnc etc. Alternatively send me a PM with node and vmi…
-
Quick bump to remind everyone that the buc1 server will be terminated on 17th April 2026. Those currently using it have a choice of a migrate to buc2 or a full rebuild on any of our other nodes. Emails have been sent to existing users explaining the…
-
(Image) Free server for Open Source Developers Hosteroid have kindly donated a fantastic six month server extension in Bucharest (buc2) which we will use to replace our buc1 server (ends 17th April 2026). This is extremely generous and has been …
-
(Quote) Very kind <3
-
@TigersWay thanks for the report, I use chrome and have not seen any issue. npm generates its own certs so I will look in to this immediately. Update. Confirmed problem - the certificates should have multiple domains included but only the first is …
-
@IAmNix Thank you, it is only by comments like this that peoples trust and cynicism will change. I find it amazing that people are happy to pay $7 for a VM from a new provider and potentially have all of their data used. Some even request KYC. We a…
-
(Quote) Well try understanding your insults can hurt.
-
(Quote) Agreed it is out of date - full NPM details are included in the VM config email. (Quote) So yes it is purely internal admin.
-
(Quote) It may 'seem' like whatever, but you are being cynical. It is insulting when we are genuinely providing a free service. I have and never will do anything with the email / name apart from use for admin messages. The purpose of the other ques…
-
@somik - Looks so much better, thank you - love it. I am a nerd and doing 'pretty' stuff never works for me.
-
(Image) Couple of updates. We just released another free server in Buffalo as our existing one has proven popular. This was donated by a current user of LES and FOSSVPS, thank you so much https://jetno.de <3 So we now have Germany (de1), Moldov…
-
@IAmNix Thanks for the mention - yes we are 'free' for Open Source developers and have full IPv6. We use NAT but have a really cool reverse proxy so http / https is directed to your VPS. Oh and it is 2cpu, 4G Ram and 64G disk. So why limit to hourl…
-
Top right has a person icon but clicking does nothing - Left hand side has profile, logout, dark mode etc. shouldn't these all be under the person icon?
-
Congrats I know how much work this can be :'( How would you like us to feedback - thread, DM, ticket ? Just initial comments - 5 (new account) emails before getting any server details seems a lot. When server is pending, it shows incorrect data e…
-
Just to let everyone know as per the emails and posts that our kindly donated Onlyservers uk1 server has been terminated.
-
Do NOT spam the two threads. I find it insulting to be accused of suspending or deleting the VPS when there is nothing wrong with the node and it is a problem you have created. This is a free service and respect and thanks are all that is necessary.…
-
Why do we need a new thread ?
-
@globalone as far as no access to your apache default page - you make it very difficult to diagnose an issue without any details. You are on a NAT server with ports forwarded to your VM as detailed in your email. If you put your apache server on one…
-
@globalone Because I had to move website away from uk1 (which shuts down on 25th). Had some issues but all working now. Do not know what you mean ' Also I have to access to my apache default page' ?
-
(Quote) Oh you bu..er ;) you mentioned that dangerous name. I thought I had avoided trouble - we do have working v6 and /64 honest !!!! At least I have control of who has access to our VMs. @somik - From previous comments, I think we pretty much a…
-
(Quote) So a single VPS is considered an 'end network' ? I agree it could be running its own hypervisor (as we do) and given a /64, we then allocate /96 subnets to our clients. Understood about the amount of V6 ips available but for me (as a provide…
-
@terrorgen totally understand what you are saying but to me it just seems like 'we' are just wasting v6 like 'we' initially wasted v4. (Quote)
-
(Quote) I only did it because I genuinely felt you were letting many of us down - the criticism was to the company rather than the person (appreciate it is often hard to separate). AMSD018 - its been off (for me) so long, so yes I agree. Don't wast…
-
I never understood the obsession with large IPv6 address ranges. As a provider I need enough to support my clients and each client as @somik suggests should only need 1 v6 per vm. But lets give a client a /123 , why should they actually need a /96. …
-
(Quote) Our donors offer /64 so we subdivide it to our clients. We could possibly request more /64 but that just creates extra work for the donor and also us. We have had no pushback giving out /96.
-
@globalone - you are welcome. You have NAT IPv4 and a /96 IPv6 subnet allocated. In your VPS email it gives you your NAT ipv4 access details (as well as ipv6). We also just introduced NPM (details just above) a reverse proxy which allows forwarding …
-
(Quote) If there was abuse, we should be given a domain name (IP is of no benefit) and in NPM it is very clear who the domain belongs to and their VPS. Not necessary to 'explore' VPS which we / I would NEVER allow.
-
Emails have been sent to clients using NAT (excluding uk1 as this will be deleted on 25th of Jan) on nodes us1, mol1 and buc1 giving details of using NPM. There is also a web page detailing the change. Happy for the community to help each other wit…
-
@somik Agreed - a client running their own forward proxy is something I had considered. However they could be doing it without NPM via v6 or (on some of our nodes we do give v4 addresses) v4. So I don't really see this creating any more of a problem…
-
@somik pointed this thread out to me (thanks) and we continued our discussion in my thread announcing our use of NPM reverse proxy.
-
(Quote) :) Glad we agree. I have put a link in your thread to here (hope that is ok). I am always happy to help any provider if they want more detail. NPM is of course giving access to 80 / 443 traffic but that does not have to be 80 / 443 on the NA…
-
@somik - that was an interesting read. Our version of NPM developed by @NStorm locks any domain created, directly to the internal NAT v4 address. The client cannot override this. The client can create their wildcard letsencrypt cert for their domain…
-
(Image) Although we have been quiet recently (and so have you) things have been really moving at FOSSVPS. FOSSVPS is associated with the development of Open Source Software and that is what we have been working on. There are two current projects …
-
(Quote) True but at least we can guarantee a service if it is running.
-
@VirMach not sure I should be specially singled out but apology accepted thank you. Two VPS on AMSD018 down for maintenance for 4 months so far and you just left us :'( May be cheeky to ask but why not - how about a donation of a dedi to FOSSVPS …