msatt
msatt
About
- Username
- msatt
- Joined
- Visits
- 4,844
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Hosting Provider, OG
- Thanked
- 387
Comments
-
Top right has a person icon but clicking does nothing - Left hand side has profile, logout, dark mode etc. shouldn't these all be under the person icon?
-
Congrats I know how much work this can be :'( How would you like us to feedback - thread, DM, ticket ? Just initial comments - 5 (new account) emails before getting any server details seems a lot. When server is pending, it shows incorrect data e…
-
Just to let everyone know as per the emails and posts that our kindly donated Onlyservers uk1 server has been terminated.
-
Do NOT spam the two threads. I find it insulting to be accused of suspending or deleting the VPS when there is nothing wrong with the node and it is a problem you have created. This is a free service and respect and thanks are all that is necessary.…
-
Why do we need a new thread ?
-
@globalone as far as no access to your apache default page - you make it very difficult to diagnose an issue without any details. You are on a NAT server with ports forwarded to your VM as detailed in your email. If you put your apache server on one…
-
@globalone Because I had to move website away from uk1 (which shuts down on 25th). Had some issues but all working now. Do not know what you mean ' Also I have to access to my apache default page' ?
-
(Quote) Oh you bu..er ;) you mentioned that dangerous name. I thought I had avoided trouble - we do have working v6 and /64 honest !!!! At least I have control of who has access to our VMs. @somik - From previous comments, I think we pretty much a…
-
(Quote) So a single VPS is considered an 'end network' ? I agree it could be running its own hypervisor (as we do) and given a /64, we then allocate /96 subnets to our clients. Understood about the amount of V6 ips available but for me (as a provide…
-
@terrorgen totally understand what you are saying but to me it just seems like 'we' are just wasting v6 like 'we' initially wasted v4. (Quote)
-
(Quote) I only did it because I genuinely felt you were letting many of us down - the criticism was to the company rather than the person (appreciate it is often hard to separate). AMSD018 - its been off (for me) so long, so yes I agree. Don't wast…
-
I never understood the obsession with large IPv6 address ranges. As a provider I need enough to support my clients and each client as @somik suggests should only need 1 v6 per vm. But lets give a client a /123 , why should they actually need a /96. …
-
(Quote) Our donors offer /64 so we subdivide it to our clients. We could possibly request more /64 but that just creates extra work for the donor and also us. We have had no pushback giving out /96.
-
@globalone - you are welcome. You have NAT IPv4 and a /96 IPv6 subnet allocated. In your VPS email it gives you your NAT ipv4 access details (as well as ipv6). We also just introduced NPM (details just above) a reverse proxy which allows forwarding …
-
(Quote) If there was abuse, we should be given a domain name (IP is of no benefit) and in NPM it is very clear who the domain belongs to and their VPS. Not necessary to 'explore' VPS which we / I would NEVER allow.
-
Emails have been sent to clients using NAT (excluding uk1 as this will be deleted on 25th of Jan) on nodes us1, mol1 and buc1 giving details of using NPM. There is also a web page detailing the change. Happy for the community to help each other wit…
-
@somik Agreed - a client running their own forward proxy is something I had considered. However they could be doing it without NPM via v6 or (on some of our nodes we do give v4 addresses) v4. So I don't really see this creating any more of a problem…
-
@somik pointed this thread out to me (thanks) and we continued our discussion in my thread announcing our use of NPM reverse proxy.
-
(Quote) :) Glad we agree. I have put a link in your thread to here (hope that is ok). I am always happy to help any provider if they want more detail. NPM is of course giving access to 80 / 443 traffic but that does not have to be 80 / 443 on the NA…
-
@somik - that was an interesting read. Our version of NPM developed by @NStorm locks any domain created, directly to the internal NAT v4 address. The client cannot override this. The client can create their wildcard letsencrypt cert for their domain…
-
(Image) Although we have been quiet recently (and so have you) things have been really moving at FOSSVPS. FOSSVPS is associated with the development of Open Source Software and that is what we have been working on. There are two current projects …
-
(Quote) True but at least we can guarantee a service if it is running.
-
@VirMach not sure I should be specially singled out but apology accepted thank you. Two VPS on AMSD018 down for maintenance for 4 months so far and you just left us :'( May be cheeky to ask but why not - how about a donation of a dedi to FOSSVPS …
-
Just a bump in case anyone on uk1 missed the above posts. The node will be destroyed on the 25th of January.
-
We are always available and happy to help - link in sig :)
-
Happy to say thats another VM cancelled - was working fine but no point just waiting for it / @VirMach (the company) to die. What a waste, Soheil should have sold the company if they could not cope. I am sure the company assets (customers) are dimi…
-
For those currently on uk1 server. Doing an automated migration is challenging particularly with static IPv4, NAT and IPv6. Doing it manually is a big job and prone to errors. So the best and simplest solution would be to create new VMs and allow y…
-
(Image) Server termination notice With regret I wanted to update everyone using the uk1 server (hosted by Onlyservers) that it will terminate on 25th of January. This is because the server was apparently won in a raffle and donated to FOSSVPS (p…
-
I control my own Name Servers and your email says (Quote) I am happy to specify another domain but not the domain I control, it would be too much trying to transfer all the records etc.
-
(Image) What a great Christmas present !!!! Thanks to Alexhost They have very kindly extended their Moldova server until 31st January 2027 We still have space available for a free VPS for Open Source Developers. Community comments have been po…
-
Order Number: 7339245839
-
I have been busy and wanted to say, we are getting into alpha testing of a big new feature at FOSSVPS giving our NAT users some great benefits.... Won't say more apart from you should have it 'soon' (New Year or earlier). Happy Christmas / Holidays…
-
So this is not LIFETIME Web Hosting Come on its in the title !!!!
-
Thanks @jcn50 Agreed about support - Proxmox can seem intimidating when you first use it ;) As far as different package sizes - I think everyone would just choose the largest so we need some restriction. I suppose it all depends what you are deve…
-
@stxsh Thanks for your support / comments. I am talking about nested virtualization so developers can run what they wish. Understand Proxmox 'complexity' but it is very flexible with VNC, snapshots, backups etc. So would a developer prefer a gui dr…
-
(Quote) Yep that pretty much sums up the story. But how can you read this thread - it is 423 pages so far and you are supposed to be developing stuff !!! I would hope that many users will switch to using your service if not for the short but longer …
-
(Quote) Sorry I disagree - This is free and I / we have no interest in your data other than to email VM details or important updates. Fair point about Cloudflare although NAT is working very well with port forwards. Agreed about snapshots but I woul…
-
@yoursunny Great points thanks. Ephemeral. Could disappear at any moment! Clueless™ Administrator! :) Ephemeral is more to do with the donors than us - we will be around. I think ephemeral should go. As far a Clueless™ Administrator! that was Tom…