@tulipyun said: But it doesn't answer my question as to whether or not the first purchasers got the bad plan at an exact higher rate than the others.
VirMach already answered that
VirMach said: In fact the plans that got created in the quantities they did average out to be better than the six plans previewed average for anyone who read what they were buying, and the plans were also pretty much right on the dot for being the intended average even in a smaller group of activations so we dodged a bullet on that one and no one can claim the lower quantities had a negative impact.
This reply I understood Virmach to be saying that the quality of the actual plans that were opened were superior to the ones that were shown by the LET-BOT, which I totally agree with as well.
But there was not the slightest response to the specific questions I asked.
Just the simple answer of whether or not the first purchasers got the bad plan at an exact higher rate than the others.
Of course, it doesn't matter if there's no answer.
Quantities are not equal for every plan variance. Quantities varied from 5 to 30 per random plan, but it does not necessarily mean what you think it means, although for it to average out properly, obviously larger plans do take up more space than others. Even so, in the original list, there were for example a 256MB plan with 10 quantity, and a 2GB plan with 30 quantity.
There were 2 plans with 30 quantity that ranged from 1024MB to 2048MB.
There were 5 plans with 25 quantity, that ranged from 128MB to 2048MB.
There were 11 plans with 20 quantity that ranged from 128MB to 3072MB.
There were 4 plans with 15 quantity that ranged from 128MB to 6144MB.
There were 3 plans with 10 quantity that ranged from 256MB to 2560MB.
There was one plan with 5 quantity that was 5120MB.
This was the average specifications for all the 7 plans that were purchased through, with the 7th not being purchased all the way. I may be off by like 3% or so in the below since it's not accounting for a few cancellations here and there but those customers cancelled at random and I could be missing like 1% of them or so maybe, I don't know, I'm just making a quick reply.
So there you that's clue, you can use all that information to work back to your specific question if you still really want a specific answer to it. Just work back from all the data you were provided.
And? So don't run 12. Which part of what I said is incorrect?
What?! To deprive one running newest Debian is blasphemy!
On a serious note: you know that virmache is shit, don't encourage them to behave even worse.
I'm not destined to be in this conversation much longer but I truly don't see a problem. I'm not a provider but if someone scraped my non-advertised sale and a bunch of lunatics bought it, a) from a rando web link, b) before the sale even started, c) without knowing what it was, and d) with a warning label saying you may well be upset, I might have intentionally given them 64MB instances as a disincentive to do it again next time.
Customers should not be blamed for buying it early because no one knows it’s a sale which is not fully prepared and if there is a warning to let people wait for the detailed rules then it will be a different story but there wasn’t any so people only choose to rely upon providers conscience and expect even the worst plan has a baseline with common sense. And yes there are check boxes so we accept any results but it doesn’t mean we shouldn’t express disappointment after that.
And if you don’t want your product to get FOMOed then sure just punish your followers in your way and wish the best luck to you business
@tulipyun said: But it doesn't answer my question as to whether or not the first purchasers got the bad plan at an exact higher rate than the others.
VirMach already answered that
VirMach said: In fact the plans that got created in the quantities they did average out to be better than the six plans previewed average for anyone who read what they were buying, and the plans were also pretty much right on the dot for being the intended average even in a smaller group of activations so we dodged a bullet on that one and no one can claim the lower quantities had a negative impact.
This reply I understood Virmach to be saying that the quality of the actual plans that were opened were superior to the ones that were shown by the LET-BOT, which I totally agree with as well.
But there was not the slightest response to the specific questions I asked.
Just the simple answer of whether or not the first purchasers got the bad plan at an exact higher rate than the others.
Of course, it doesn't matter if there's no answer.
Quantities are not equal for every plan variance. Quantities varied from 5 to 30 per random plan, but it does not necessarily mean what you think it means, although for it to average out properly, obviously larger plans do take up more space than others. Even so, in the original list, there were for example a 256MB plan with 10 quantity, and a 2GB plan with 30 quantity.
There were 2 plans with 30 quantity that ranged from 1024MB to 2048MB.
There were 5 plans with 25 quantity, that ranged from 128MB to 2048MB.
There were 11 plans with 20 quantity that ranged from 128MB to 3072MB.
There were 4 plans with 15 quantity that ranged from 128MB to 6144MB.
There were 3 plans with 10 quantity that ranged from 256MB to 2560MB.
There was one plan with 5 quantity that was 5120MB.
This was the average specifications for all the 7 plans that were purchased through, with the 7th not being purchased all the way. I may be off by like 3% or so in the below since it's not accounting for a few cancellations here and there but those customers cancelled at random and I could be missing like 1% of them or so maybe, I don't know, I'm just making a quick reply.
So there you that's clue, you can use all that information to work back to your specific question if you still really want a specific answer to it. Just work back from all the data you were provided.
Thank you very much for providing such detailed data, but it doesn't help to answer the specific question I posed, which both you and FrankZ chose to avoid completely on the point about whether the worst planned ones are specifically distributed at the top of the order list. I guess that's kind of the answer.
And? So don't run 12. Which part of what I said is incorrect?
What?! To deprive one running newest Debian is blasphemy!
On a serious note: you know that virmache is shit, don't encourage them to behave even worse.
I'm not destined to be in this conversation much longer but I truly don't see a problem. I'm not a provider but if someone scraped my non-advertised sale and a bunch of lunatics bought it, a) from a rando web link, b) before the sale even started, c) without knowing what it was, and d) with a warning label saying you may well be upset, I might have intentionally given them 64MB instances as a disincentive to do it again next time.
Customers should not be blamed for buying it early because no one knows it’s a sale which is not fully prepared and if there is a warning to let people wait for the detailed rules then it will be a different story but there wasn’t any so people only choose to rely upon providers conscience and expect even the worst plan has a baseline with common sense. And yes there are check boxes so we accept any results but it doesn’t mean we shouldn’t express disappointment after that.
And if you don’t want your product to get FOMOed then sure just punish your followers in your way and wish the best luck to you business
My condolences on still not having learned the lesson. Keep trying. I'm sure you'll get it eventually.
Can you share how to do it? I have a 64mb machine idling and kernel panics every time when the host reboots, causing high CPU load, had to manually shut it down.
@tulipyun said: But it doesn't answer my question as to whether or not the first purchasers got the bad plan at an exact higher rate than the others.
VirMach already answered that
VirMach said: In fact the plans that got created in the quantities they did average out to be better than the six plans previewed average for anyone who read what they were buying, and the plans were also pretty much right on the dot for being the intended average even in a smaller group of activations so we dodged a bullet on that one and no one can claim the lower quantities had a negative impact.
This reply I understood Virmach to be saying that the quality of the actual plans that were opened were superior to the ones that were shown by the LET-BOT, which I totally agree with as well.
But there was not the slightest response to the specific questions I asked.
Just the simple answer of whether or not the first purchasers got the bad plan at an exact higher rate than the others.
Of course, it doesn't matter if there's no answer.
Quantities are not equal for every plan variance. Quantities varied from 5 to 30 per random plan, but it does not necessarily mean what you think it means, although for it to average out properly, obviously larger plans do take up more space than others. Even so, in the original list, there were for example a 256MB plan with 10 quantity, and a 2GB plan with 30 quantity.
There were 2 plans with 30 quantity that ranged from 1024MB to 2048MB.
There were 5 plans with 25 quantity, that ranged from 128MB to 2048MB.
There were 11 plans with 20 quantity that ranged from 128MB to 3072MB.
There were 4 plans with 15 quantity that ranged from 128MB to 6144MB.
There were 3 plans with 10 quantity that ranged from 256MB to 2560MB.
There was one plan with 5 quantity that was 5120MB.
This was the average specifications for all the 7 plans that were purchased through, with the 7th not being purchased all the way. I may be off by like 3% or so in the below since it's not accounting for a few cancellations here and there but those customers cancelled at random and I could be missing like 1% of them or so maybe, I don't know, I'm just making a quick reply.
So there you that's clue, you can use all that information to work back to your specific question if you still really want a specific answer to it. Just work back from all the data you were provided.
It’s doesn’t make much sense to calculate the average like you and Buffett have $60B in average.
what’s the percentage of people who get exactly 128M and what do you think these vps can be used for?
@HiEndSoul said: Customers should not be blamed for buying it early because no one knows it’s a sale which is not fully prepared and if there is a warning to let people wait for the detailed rules then it will be a different story but there wasn’t any so people only choose to rely upon providers conscience and expect even the worst plan has a baseline with common sense. And yes there are check boxes so we accept any results but it doesn’t mean we shouldn’t express disappointment after that.
And if you don’t want your product to get FOMOed then sure just punish your followers in your way and wish the best luck to you business
Are you seriously saying that it's normal to purchase a random service just because the URL exists and the product should just be whatever each customer imagines it is?
@HiEndSoul said: Customers should not be blamed for buying it early because no one knows it’s a sale which is not fully prepared and if there is a warning to let people wait for the detailed rules then it will be a different story but there wasn’t any so people only choose to rely upon providers conscience and expect even the worst plan has a baseline with common sense. And yes there are check boxes so we accept any results but it doesn’t mean we shouldn’t express disappointment after that.
And if you don’t want your product to get FOMOed then sure just punish your followers in your way and wish the best luck to you business
Are you seriously saying that it's normal to purchase a random service just because the URL exists and the product should just be whatever each customer imagines it is?
For the first half, yes that’s exactly how BF deals spread across communities.
For the next half, people just expect there will be a baseline with common sense
@tulipyun I bought a Mystery Box that ended up being in group 6. If VirMach will allow it (I'll pay my $3 transfer fee, if you will pay your $3 transfer fee), I'll trade mine for yours, but I won't tell you what it is before hand. So, do you want to trade ?
@tulipyun said: Thank you very much for providing such detailed data, but it doesn't help to answer the specific question I posed, which both you and FrankZ chose to avoid completely on the point about whether the worst planned ones are specifically distributed at the top of the order list. I guess that's kind of the answer.
I'm going to try one last time because I'm an arrogant bastard and think I'm special enough to get through to you.
Yes, it's true. The. Plans. Were. Preordained. You got what you got determined by when you ordered. Virmach actually said as much in the thread. I can hear you saying, "AHA! So I AM being punished for ordering early."NO! Because all of that was set up before the link that you nitwits used to order early was even leaked. In other words when all these plans were being created, put in order, etc... nobody even knew you were going to do something so daft. I'm going to say that again. It. Was. Not. A. Nefarious. Plot. Nobody knew in advance.
I won't be asking any new questions on this.
Good, because you aren't capable of hearing the answer when it's been given.
@HiEndSoul said: It’s doesn’t make much sense to calculate the average like you and Buffett have $60B in average.
what’s the percentage of people who get exactly 128M?
Good analogy, when you are the one trying to get the exact average of me and Buffet after being provided a more meaningful one. I've provided you with enough information for you to make your own determination. I could answer your question more directly if you first propose a concern that would be answered by it and put you at ease.
It’s doesn’t make much sense to calculate the average like you and Buffett have $60B in average.
what’s the percentage of people who get exactly 128M and what do you think these vps can be used for?
It wouldn't make sense to you anyways because you've decided someone is out to scam you out of your $20.
@FAT32 said:
How about just stop scanning other people's billing area.
Make it makes sense. If a product is hidden in the storeroom, you dont go inside the storeroom and get whatever you like.
Especially you dont even know what's the terms like.
No buyers knows that product was scanned from that way and if you don’t want people to buy it just disable it or set 0 stock
What did they know? You genuinely just went wow, a VirMach deal, linked by a third party, it must be at least exactly 384MB memory or more official deal and therefore it's a great value at $20/2YR, but if it is below 384MB, I will spend my whole day making my dissatisfaction known?
Let's say the offer was officially posted, and you were linked this by a random guy, would you not first search for the offer to see what it is?
@HiEndSoul said: It’s doesn’t make much sense to calculate the average like you and Buffett have $60B in average.
what’s the percentage of people who get exactly 128M?
Good analogy, when you are the one trying to get the exact average of me and Buffet after being provided a more meaningful one. I've provided you with enough information for you to make your own determination. I could answer your question more directly if you first propose a concern that would be answered by it and put you at ease.
That analogy makes sense because it just like the average between 128Ms and highest plans and what I expressed is so many* 128Ms is way too much for entertainment both for quantities and the spec
@FAT32 said:
How about just stop scanning other people's billing area.
Make it makes sense. If a product is hidden in the storeroom, you dont go inside the storeroom and get whatever you like.
Especially you dont even know what's the terms like.
No buyers knows that product was scanned from that way and if you don’t want people to buy it just disable it or set 0 stock
What did they know? You genuinely just went wow, a VirMach deal, linked by a third party, it must be at least exactly 384MB memory or more official deal and therefore it's a great value at $20/2YR, but if it is below 384MB, I will spend my whole day making my dissatisfaction known?
Because it just the common sense to make it at least usable.
What is your suggested use case for those 128Ms (actually 103M shows in OS) as provider?
@alvaro said: @VirMach MIAZ012 is down, your status page is showing 800+ load
I'm aware, I'm not the person on shift that's supposed to make the network status page. I'll see what happened there and create it as I assumed it was already there. I noticed a drop down so I'm seeing if it will calm down as in this scenario it's better than immediately rebooting.
@VirMach said:
Are you seriously saying that it's normal to purchase a random service just because the URL exists and the product should just be whatever each customer imagines it is?
For the first half, yes that’s exactly how BF deals spread across communities.
Question was NORMAL TO PURCHASE, not spread across communities.
[sarcasm]
But you are totally right - it's normal that when some random guy on that Internet that checked every productID in ascending order on amazon.com links you something with title "Computer" and price 20$, without any pictures, any description, week before actual BlackFriday you instantly go buy that and when two weeks later arrives plastic toy shaped like a computer worth 2$ you sue Amazon for damages, demand refund and you call theirs customer support 185817587 times
[/sarcasm]
Haven't bought a single service in VirMach Great Ryzen 2022 - 2023 Flash Sale.
What a way for a provider with a long todo list to create more work and spend more time on forums. I'm sure it will be replicated extensively next year.
@HeyImClueless said:
What a way for a provider with a long todo list to create more work and spend more time on forums. I'm sure it will be replicated extensively next year.
Sadly not spending as much time as others today. I missed lots of comments and I'm pretty sure I got beaten out by @HiEndSoul as top VirMach-related poster today.
@VirMach said:
Are you seriously saying that it's normal to purchase a random service just because the URL exists and the product should just be whatever each customer imagines it is?
For the first half, yes that’s exactly how BF deals spread across communities.
Question was NORMAL TO PURCHASE, not spread across communities.
[sarcasm]
But you are totally right - it's normal that when some random guy on that Internet that checked every productID in ascending order on amazon.com links you something with title "Computer" and price 20$, without any pictures, any description, week before actual BlackFriday you instantly go buy that and when two weeks later arrives plastic toy shaped like a computer worth 2$ you sue Amazon for damages, demand refund and you call theirs customer support 185817587 times
[/sarcasm]
As a result it has been normal to purchase the product called mystery box because it literally so many* people bought it before Virmach revealed the rules and it should be normal if you get something under a baseline in common sense and then accept it but express your feelings
@fan said:
Can you share how to do it? I have a 64mb machine idling and kernel panics every time when the host reboots, causing high CPU load, had to manually shut it down.
I don't think there was any magic Just built form an old minimal debian7 template as I recall. Probably no providers offer that anymore, but you might be able to get it going with an old iso image you load yourself somewhere. Try looking at https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive
@HeyImClueless said:
What a way for a provider with a long todo list to create more work and spend more time on forums. I'm sure it will be replicated extensively next year.
Sadly not spending as much time as others today. I missed lots of comments and I'm pretty sure I got beaten out by @HiEndSoul as top VirMach-related poster today.
At least you shouldn’t miss those comments which tagged you
@FrankZ said: @tulipyun I bought a Mystery Box that ended up being in group 6. If VirMach will allow it (I'll pay my $3 transfer fee, if you will pay your $3 transfer fee), I'll trade mine for yours, but I won't tell you what it is before hand. So, do you want to trade ?
I tried to understand what you meant, but I failed.
Now we both know that you hold SKU6# and I hold SKU1#, what does it mean to say "but I won't tell you what it is before hand" in such a situation?
@FrankZ said: @tulipyun I bought a Mystery Box that ended up being in group 6. If VirMach will allow it (I'll pay my $3 transfer fee, if you will pay your $3 transfer fee), I'll trade mine for yours, but I won't tell you what it is before hand. So, do you want to trade ?
I tried to understand what you meant, but I failed.
Now we both know that you hold SKU6# and I hold SKU1#, what does it mean to say "but I won't tell you what it is before hand" in such a situation?
@FrankZ said: @tulipyun I bought a Mystery Box that ended up being in group 6. If VirMach will allow it (I'll pay my $3 transfer fee, if you will pay your $3 transfer fee), I'll trade mine for yours, but I won't tell you what it is before hand. So, do you want to trade ?
I tried to understand what you meant, but I failed.
Now we both know that you hold SKU6# and I hold SKU1#, what does it mean to say "but I won't tell you what it is before hand" in such a situation?
@FrankZ said: @tulipyun I bought a Mystery Box that ended up being in group 6. If VirMach will allow it (I'll pay my $3 transfer fee, if you will pay your $3 transfer fee), I'll trade mine for yours, but I won't tell you what it is before hand. So, do you want to trade ?
I tried to understand what you meant, but I failed.
Now we both know that you hold SKU6# and I hold SKU1#, what does it mean to say "but I won't tell you what it is before hand" in such a situation?
it means
mystery box
my goodness
Oh, my bad.
If he's referring to the mystery box, here's my answer:
Before, I would have purchased it, and I did in fact.
Now I won't, and distinguishing between some people and things at a tiny cost is a simple and effective way for someone as stupid as me to do so.
I'm sure you saw the results of yesterday's poll (I don't know why I can't find it anymore) and after something happens, everyone makes their own choices, don't they?
My services need to be transferred has been done
Butt invoices remain
VirmAch's dev won't verify the frontend input
neither get bothered to consider the edge cases
@Flying_Chinaman said:
My services need to be transferred has been done
Butt invoices remain
VirmAch's dev won't verify the frontend input
neither get bothered to consider the edge cases
User error. I heard they clicked the button twice and it seems like they also made the transfer request last minute. We can try to place more restrictions but we were leaning toward some common sense being applied by the requestor. :'(
Cases where you need assistance due to possibly double clicking payment button or needing to do it last minute would fall under needing support and $10 custom transfer.
(edit) Okay so I'm thinking if you double click payment button it cancels the whole request and permanently stops you from using the feature, and if you request it while you have unpaid invoices for the services it just locks you out of your account. Only kidding. A little.
Giving away vps, you read it right, I will pay 3$ to give away this vps, come on, please send me an email with your transfer address! It's first come first served.
Edit:The email address is available in my profile!
Giving away vps, you read it right, I will pay 3$ to give away this vps, come on, please send me an email with your transfer address! It's first come first served.
Giving away vps, you read it right, I will pay 3$ to give away this vps, come on, please send me an email with your transfer address! It's first come first served.
Edit:The email address is available in my profile!
Giving away vps, you read it right, I will pay 3$ to give away this vps, come on, please send me an email with your transfer address! It's first come first served.
Edit:The email address is available in my profile!
A transfer request has been sent. All right, everybody.
Giving away vps, you read it right, I will pay 3$ to give away this vps, come on, please send me an email with your transfer address! It's first come first served.
Edit:The email address is available in my profile!
Giving away vps, you read it right, I will pay 3$ to give away this vps, come on, please send me an email with your transfer address! It's first come first served.
FWIW, I installed Alpine on it and this little thing is a freaking beast. Perfect for running caddy with some low-traffic sites. Learned a ton in the process too.
vm:~$ free -m
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 349 48 108 2 193 289
Swap: 0 0 0
Comments
Quantities are not equal for every plan variance. Quantities varied from 5 to 30 per random plan, but it does not necessarily mean what you think it means, although for it to average out properly, obviously larger plans do take up more space than others. Even so, in the original list, there were for example a 256MB plan with 10 quantity, and a 2GB plan with 30 quantity.
This was the average specifications for all the 7 plans that were purchased through, with the 7th not being purchased all the way. I may be off by like 3% or so in the below since it's not accounting for a few cancellations here and there but those customers cancelled at random and I could be missing like 1% of them or so maybe, I don't know, I'm just making a quick reply.
1675MB RAM, 1.65 CPU, 37GB Disk, 4202GB Bandwidth.
This takes into order quantities already. So the average person got that for $20/2YR ($10/YR.)
If we average out the plans, which this part you can do yourself without the quantities actually sold per plan, it would be:
2066MB RAM, 1.71 CPU, 38GB Disk, 3500GB Bandwidth.
So there you that's clue, you can use all that information to work back to your specific question if you still really want a specific answer to it. Just work back from all the data you were provided.
Customers should not be blamed for buying it early because no one knows it’s a sale which is not fully prepared and if there is a warning to let people wait for the detailed rules then it will be a different story but there wasn’t any so people only choose to rely upon providers conscience and expect even the worst plan has a baseline with common sense. And yes there are check boxes so we accept any results but it doesn’t mean we shouldn’t express disappointment after that.
And if you don’t want your product to get FOMOed then sure just punish your followers in your way and wish the best luck to you business
Thank you very much for providing such detailed data, but it doesn't help to answer the specific question I posed, which both you and FrankZ chose to avoid completely on the point about whether the worst planned ones are specifically distributed at the top of the order list. I guess that's kind of the answer.
I won't be asking any new questions on this.
Anyway, thanks guys.
My condolences on still not having learned the lesson. Keep trying. I'm sure you'll get it eventually.
I've recently experienced with automatically being logged out by Virmach website. Has anyone experienced with that or just me alone?
Virmach Deals
Can you share how to do it? I have a 64mb machine idling and kernel panics every time when the host reboots, causing high CPU load, had to manually shut it down.
It’s doesn’t make much sense to calculate the average like you and Buffett have $60B in average.
what’s the percentage of people who get exactly 128M and what do you think these vps can be used for?
Are you seriously saying that it's normal to purchase a random service just because the URL exists and the product should just be whatever each customer imagines it is?
For the first half, yes that’s exactly how BF deals spread across communities.
For the next half, people just expect there will be a baseline with common sense
How about just stop scanning other people's billing area.
Make it makes sense. If a product is hidden in the storeroom, you dont go inside the storeroom and get whatever you like.
Especially you dont even know what's the terms like.
食之无味 弃之可惜 - Too arduous to relish, too wasteful to discard.
@tulipyun I bought a Mystery Box that ended up being in group 6. If VirMach will allow it (I'll pay my $3 transfer fee, if you will pay your $3 transfer fee), I'll trade mine for yours, but I won't tell you what it is before hand. So, do you want to trade ?
I'm going to try one last time because I'm an arrogant bastard and think I'm special enough to get through to you.
Yes, it's true. The. Plans. Were. Preordained. You got what you got determined by when you ordered. Virmach actually said as much in the thread. I can hear you saying, "AHA! So I AM being punished for ordering early." NO! Because all of that was set up before the link that you nitwits used to order early was even leaked. In other words when all these plans were being created, put in order, etc... nobody even knew you were going to do something so daft. I'm going to say that again. It. Was. Not. A. Nefarious. Plot. Nobody knew in advance.
Good, because you aren't capable of hearing the answer when it's been given.
No buyers knows that product was scanned from that way and if you don’t want people to buy it just disable it or set 0 stock
Good analogy, when you are the one trying to get the exact average of me and Buffet after being provided a more meaningful one. I've provided you with enough information for you to make your own determination. I could answer your question more directly if you first propose a concern that would be answered by it and put you at ease.
It wouldn't make sense to you anyways because you've decided someone is out to scam you out of your $20.
Lesson learned: don't click on unofficially provided links.
(official =
@VirMach/@LES-BOT/ ... )What did they know? You genuinely just went wow, a VirMach deal, linked by a third party, it must be at least exactly 384MB memory or more official deal and therefore it's a great value at $20/2YR, but if it is below 384MB, I will spend my whole day making my dissatisfaction known?
Let's say the offer was officially posted, and you were linked this by a random guy, would you not first search for the offer to see what it is?
the MJJs here are really spoiling my impression of MJJ average intelligence.
i mean, its really a special breed of MJJ
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
That analogy makes sense because it just like the average between 128Ms and highest plans and what I expressed is so many* 128Ms is way too much for entertainment both for quantities and the spec
@VirMach MIAZ012 is down, your status page is showing 800+ load
Because it just the common sense to make it at least usable.
What is your suggested use case for those 128Ms (actually 103M shows in OS) as provider?
I'm aware, I'm not the person on shift that's supposed to make the network status page. I'll see what happened there and create it as I assumed it was already there. I noticed a drop down so I'm seeing if it will calm down as in this scenario it's better than immediately rebooting.
Question was NORMAL TO PURCHASE, not spread across communities.
[sarcasm]
But you are totally right - it's normal that when some random guy on that Internet that checked every productID in ascending order on amazon.com links you something with title "Computer" and price 20$, without any pictures, any description, week before actual BlackFriday you instantly go buy that and when two weeks later arrives plastic toy shaped like a computer worth 2$ you sue Amazon for damages, demand refund and you call theirs customer support 185817587 times
[/sarcasm]
Haven't bought a single service in VirMach Great Ryzen 2022 - 2023 Flash Sale.
What a way for a provider with a long todo list to create more work and spend more time on forums. I'm sure it will be replicated extensively next year.
Sadly not spending as much time as others today. I missed lots of comments and I'm pretty sure I got beaten out by @HiEndSoul as top VirMach-related poster today.
As a result it has been normal to purchase the product called mystery box because it literally so many* people bought it before Virmach revealed the rules and it should be normal if you get something under a baseline in common sense and then accept it but express your feelings
Ontario Dildo Inspector
MIAZ012 is back up
I don't think there was any magic Just built form an old minimal debian7 template as I recall. Probably no providers offer that anymore, but you might be able to get it going with an old iso image you load yourself somewhere. Try looking at https://www.debian.org/distrib/archive
Dataplane.org's current server hosting provider list
Sadly wheezy doesn't work on ryzen, guess I'll continue to keep it powered off since there's no cancel button for it.
@fan
This procedure works to reduce the required memory when booting Debian 11.
Then run
Then reboot.
At least you shouldn’t miss those comments which tagged you
sometimes i transform into an australian jackass
youtube.com/watch?v=k1BneeJTDcU
I tried to understand what you meant, but I failed.
Now we both know that you hold SKU6# and I hold SKU1#, what does it mean to say "but I won't tell you what it is before hand" in such a situation?
it means
mystery box
my goodness
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
Oh, my bad.
If he's referring to the mystery box, here's my answer:
Before, I would have purchased it, and I did in fact.
Now I won't, and distinguishing between some people and things at a tiny cost is a simple and effective way for someone as stupid as me to do so.
I'm sure you saw the results of yesterday's poll (I don't know why I can't find it anymore) and after something happens, everyone makes their own choices, don't they?
@yoursunny would say "double my dik"
Ontario Dildo Inspector
Did A Virmach transfer today, took less than 2h for it to be processed.
Kudos!!
The Ultimate Speedtest Script | Get Instant Alerts on new LES/LET deals | Cheap VPS Deals | VirMach Flash Sales Notifier
FREE KVM VPS - FreeVPS.org | FREE LXC VPS - MicroLXC
My services need to be transferred has been done
Butt invoices remain
VirmAch's dev won't verify the frontend input
neither get bothered to consider the edge cases
Ontario Dildo Inspector
@VirMach - can you please review ticket #627496 - it's just a migrate request. Thanks
I didn’t expect to see Highlander here. I am a shareholder of Highlander. hahaha.
User error. I heard they clicked the button twice and it seems like they also made the transfer request last minute. We can try to place more restrictions but we were leaning toward some common sense being applied by the requestor. :'(
Cases where you need assistance due to possibly double clicking payment button or needing to do it last minute would fall under needing support and $10 custom transfer.
(edit) Okay so I'm thinking if you double click payment button it cancels the whole request and permanently stops you from using the feature, and if you request it while you have unpaid invoices for the services it just locks you out of your account. Only kidding. A little.
Giving away vps, you read it right, I will pay 3$ to give away this vps, come on, please send me an email with your transfer address! It's first come first served.
Edit:The email address is available in my profile!
Where it at?
Install openwrt on it. fuc* good.
A transfer request has been sent. All right, everybody.
Ah, I guess I'm late.
Any particular location you're looking for?
FWIW, I installed Alpine on it and this little thing is a freaking beast. Perfect for running caddy with some low-traffic sites. Learned a ton in the process too.
Still won't renew it at that price though. 😂
It's pronounced hacker.