VirMach - Complain - Moan - Praise - Chit Chat - Flan

17576788081274

Comments

  • FrankZFrankZ ModeratorOG

    @VirMach said:

    @FrankZ said: EDIT: Spoke too soon, both Frankfurt VMs are unreachable again.

    Frankfurt got rebooted. Amsterdam should still be in the same state as it was a few hours ago.

    Thank you. I rebooted and all is good again in Frankfurt.

  • @VirMach said:

    @erk said:
    Oddly, Hetrix reports 47.87.196.xxx alternating between reachable and non-reachable, depending on which origin is attempting to hit it.
    I guess it's a lingering BGP route?

    Yep, they didn't even pull it correctly. Usually how it works is they would make de-announcement requests. They just unsigned the records, didn't pull it from ARIN. Which makes it easier to bring it back so whatever.

    @Jab said: all new IPs just went down, lmao/panic.

    @FrankZ said: EDIT: Spoke too soon, both Frankfurt VMs are unreachable again.

    Frankfurt got rebooted. Amsterdam should still be in the same state as it was a few hours ago.

    Yea, it's weird... I have a 47.87.141.xxx server in LA running a database and my web server (different provider) has had no issues connecting to it all day. I can also SSH into all my 47.87.xxx.xxx US VPS's. But none of them can access my web server.

  • 3vms to go now.

  • edited April 2023

    @Jab said: Yeah, seems like something (or someone) shut down everything I had in Frankfurt/Amsterdam and I had to manually click BOOT in panel. Is this IP renumbering script going crazy?

    @Jab said: I guess this is new entry in Network status, but this needs timestamps in some known timezone, @VirMach please next time - put timestamps on updates.

    Vague on purpose as I'm not the one doing it.

    I have someone helping out who's more interested in fixing everything than being graceful. It most likely means SolusVM is not being cooperative so he's instead using a hammer on the servers. We had to do it in a very non-SolusVM API way for it not to take half a day (which is funny since, you know... but that just means doing it the other way would've taken two.) Amsterdam didn't get rebooted, but VMs might be receiving additional work.

    Frankfurt finally got rebooted, it got delayed until now.

  • @FrankZ said:

    Just a quick note for Alma 8 users....
    I found each of my three EU VMs stuck at a waiting on rc.local job during boot after the old IPv4 were removed. While using VNC and booting into Alma 8 rescue mode from the boot menu, not rescue mode in SolusVM, I was able to start the VMs normally and change what needed to be changed regarding IPv4 configurations.

    I put most of my VMs on DHCP back during the first wave of re-IP's. I just click Reboot and * poof * I've got the new IP.

  • @soulchief said: Yea, it's weird... I have a 47.87.141.xxx server in LA running a database and my web server (different provider) has had no issues connecting to it all day. I can also SSH into all my 47.87.xxx.xxx US VPS's. But none of them can access my web server.

    I'm actually so happy it happened this way. Sure it's annoying and confusing but at least we only got like under 1,000 tickets instead of probably 2K+

  • @skorous said: I put most of my VMs on DHCP back during the first wave of re-IP's. I just click Reboot and * poof * I've got the new IP.

    Only thing I miss about OpenVZ is the poof.

  • @VirMach said:

    @rockinmusicgv said:
    NYCB009 has been down for about a day and seems to be on a different IP block. Is there any indication when that node might be restored?

    Yeah, it didn't come back long enough for us to be able to complete the planned emergency migration. It's difficult to get back online too, we've been working on that for a long time. Still speaking with RAID controller manufacturer but now it seems like there's a whole set of other issues.

    I don't have any more information at the time.

    Does this mean I should be expecting an extended outage?

  • @rockinmusicgv said: Does this mean I should be expecting an extended outage?

    It means I don't have an answer for that question right now but hopefully should later tonight.

  • FrankZFrankZ ModeratorOG

    @skorous said: I put most of my VMs on DHCP back during the first wave of re-IP's. I just click Reboot and * poof * I've got the new IP.

    I have too many things bound to specific IPs for that to work for me. Sure I don't have to do it that way, but I sleep better at night.

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King YABS 24/7/365

    is AMS considered complete?

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • I tried to connect to my web server from my local location, timed out.
    Connected to an VPN in NY, tried again, it worked!
    My VPS is at the node SEAZ007, maybe it's something related to route propagation, maybe the previous IPs are being reestablished?

  • edited April 2023

    The problem looks like solved in Germany location (FFME003) with the new IP address. My VM accessible again. In the SolusVM panel needed to use the 'Reconfigure Networking' button. I got an error message ('An error occured: unklnown error') from the panel, but after that the VPS got accessible again.

    Sadly the connectivity issues (routing problem?) still exist in many USA location :/ For example: LAXA026, DALZ003, SEAZ010, etc. I'm able to reache most of the servers from my local (home) ISP, but the VM's can't connect to my other application servers (connection timed out, etc). For example: (ping.pe test):: https://i.imgur.com/gLsY4hx.png

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King YABS 24/7/365

    AMS down again?

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • I'm on LAXA015. I'm in the IP block with the issues. Based on earlier comments I tried connecting via VPN to a local server in Los Angeles. It works!

    I can SSH in from my client computer and also access HTTPS (after bypassing my usual Cloudflare setup). Wanted to pass this on in case anyone can make use of it.

  • @AlwaysSkint said:
    ^ Due to being a Windoze luser. :| :bleep_bloop:

    now i know +1 more thing that itches you.

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King YABS 24/7/365
    edited April 2023

    AMS broke because

    /etc/network/interfaces

    was auto reconfigured to

    eth0

    when it should have been

    ens3

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • FrankZFrankZ ModeratorOG

    @cybertech said:
    AMS broke because

    /etc/network/interfaces

    was auto reconfigured to

    eth0

    when it should have been

    ens3

    I could be wrong but IIRC, reconfigure networking in SolusVM is designed to work with templates, not ISO installs. So it is a feature not a bug. :)

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King YABS 24/7/365
    edited April 2023

    @FrankZ said:
    I could be wrong but IIRC, reconfigure networking in SolusVM is designed to work with templates, not ISO installs. So it is a feature not a bug. :)

    yeah except i didnt do that, it was automated.

    i configured my network manually

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • @cybertech said:

    @FrankZ said:
    I could be wrong but IIRC, reconfigure networking in SolusVM is designed to work with templates, not ISO installs. So it is a feature not a bug. :)

    yeah except i didnt do that, it was automated.

    i configured my network manually

    This was pinging/not blocked off from ping, right? Looking into our reconfigure script that runs in the background.

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King YABS 24/7/365

    @VirMach said:

    @cybertech said:

    @FrankZ said:
    I could be wrong but IIRC, reconfigure networking in SolusVM is designed to work with templates, not ISO installs. So it is a feature not a bug. :)

    yeah except i didnt do that, it was automated.

    i configured my network manually

    This was pinging/not blocked off from ping, right? Looking into our reconfigure script that runs in the background.

    im not sure what the question is, but i had configured manually the new IP correctly and VM was online.

    suddenly it was reconfigured to eth0.

    i manually reconfigured back to ens3 and works again now.

    like what @FrankZ mentioned im using ISO install and not from template, so it may affect those on ISO.

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • edited April 2023

    Node Name: TPAZ003
    https://imgur.com/a/7qdj9Da

  • @cybertech would we be able to ping the public IPv4 address? As in no firewall preventing that?

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King YABS 24/7/365
    edited April 2023

    @VirMach said:
    @cybertech would we be able to ping the public IPv4 address? As in no firewall preventing that?

    yes in my case (manual config) it is now pingable , tried from SG/TYO/LAX

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • FritzFritz Behlnd you

    Change eth0 to ens3
    Restart network solve the problem for Frankfurt location.

  • @cybertech said: yes in my case (manual config) it is now pingable , tried from SG/TYO/LAX

    Figured out the issue. The script doesn't do a heavy level of testing (e.g, running an entire ping.pe) and since it's a newly announced block routing isn't perfect and it could falsely mark one as not pinging if there's a little bit of loss.

    I'm filtering out the list first using mass ping tool and then only inputting that into the script instead. Sorry about that.

  • Received an update from them, verbatim:

    We'll be done in ten minutes

    Going to just wait it out and check for myself before getting everyone's hopes up on the network status page, but I don't mind getting everyone's hopes up here, unofficially. ;)

  • Nice, I see it back on RADB for a few so far.

  • @VirMach said:
    Nice, I see it back on RADB for a few so far.

    47.87 prefix, or few subnets of it?

  • @ByteVirt said: 47.87 prefix, or few subnets of it?

    All of it, except Frankfurt and Amsterdam which we moved off this morning/afternoon. It'll still take some time of course, it'll come in similarly to how it went out, not all suddenly.

  • @tonyapac said:
    Node Name: TPAZ003
    https://imgur.com/a/7qdj9Da

    @VirMach
    https://billing.virmach.com/serverstatus.php
    It does not mention TPAZ003 and IP 47.87.206.*, the situation is the VM is not reachable.

  • @VirMach said:
    All of it, except Frankfurt and Amsterdam which we moved off this morning/afternoon. It'll still take some time of course, it'll come in similarly to how it went out, not all suddenly.

    Lets hope everything goes smoothly

  • @tonyapac said: 47.87.206.*

    That's within 47.87.128.0/17

  • FrankZFrankZ ModeratorOG

    TYOC007 just pop'd back online. Thanks VirMach.

  • FritzFritz Behlnd you

    Any news for 47.87.136.xxx and 47.87.153.xxx ?

  • JabJab TOP Member 2027
    edited April 2023

    @Fritz said:
    Any news for 47.87.136.xxx and 47.87.153.xxx ?

    --

    @VirMach said:
    That's within 47.87.128.0/17

    47.87.128.0/17 = FROM 47.87.128.0 TO 47.87.255.255

    Haven't bought a single service in VirMach Great Ryzen 2022 - 2023 Flash Sale.

  • huh?i think tyoc026 has no impact,but actually my network got edited too,turns into eth0, and waste my 1hour of sleep time to fix this.
    how I fix this? waste 55mins for fixing nothing and 5mins later it recovered itself

  • JabJab TOP Member 2027

    @VirMach copy-paste from LET, I am to stupid to understand it, but maybe important :D

    @jtk said: I saw reports of intermittent reachability. I suspect, a problem now is that QuadraNet is announcing a /20 in this prefix, but there are only ROAs with Alibaba's origin ASes published in the RPKI for the covered address space, which means many nets will be invalidating and rejecting the QuadraNet announcement. Let's see how long it takes people in the LES thread to figure this out. :-)

    Haven't bought a single service in VirMach Great Ryzen 2022 - 2023 Flash Sale.

  • edited April 2023

    @Jab said:
    @VirMach copy-paste from LET, I am to stupid to understand it, but maybe important :D

    @jtk said: I saw reports of intermittent reachability. I suspect, a problem now is that QuadraNet is announcing a /20 in this prefix, but there are only ROAs with Alibaba's origin ASes published in the RPKI for the covered address space, which means many nets will be invalidating and rejecting the QuadraNet announcement. Let's see how long it takes people in the LES thread to figure this out. :-)

    Sounds like they're describing the initial issue?

    (edit) Oh

  • so, if I am reading the service status page correctly, the payment issue or what ever with Alibaba has been resolved and the subnet is getting reassigned and it will just take time? if so, I have a lot of that and thank you for the updates :)

  • Okay so good news is that they're aware, but looks like it's going to take a little longer than the initial "we'll be done in ten minutes." They're keeping me posted.

  • @dgc1980 said:
    so, if I am reading the service status page correctly, the payment issue or what ever with Alibaba has been resolved and the subnet is getting reassigned and it will just take time? if so, I have a lot of that and thank you for the updates :)

    Yep, basically.

  • FritzFritz Behlnd you

    @Jab said:

    @Fritz said:
    Any news for 47.87.136.xxx and 47.87.153.xxx ?

    --

    @VirMach said:
    That's within 47.87.128.0/17

    47.87.128.0/17 = FROM 47.87.128.0 TO 47.87.255.255

    I meant. didn't see any news for .136 and .153 but from .225 which is on the same range.

  • Anyone's machine in NY up? Mine is still down.

  • edited April 2023

    @lesuser said:
    Anyone's machine in NY up? Mine is still down.

    NY has just come back up for me.

  • All my services are just popping back online :)

  • @rhinoduck said:

    @lesuser said:
    Anyone's machine in NY up? Mine is still down.

    NY has just come back up for me.

    Mine is also up now.

  • Indeed, all green here now. Yay!

Sign In or Register to comment.