Finally Storage VPS Offers Are Back In Stock Plus Some Shared Offers - servaRICA

servarica_haniservarica_hani Hosting ProviderOG

Hi All

Finally after the big move to our own private datacenter suit , we have more room for expansion.
This is the first offer after the expansion and soon you will get different offers once we install new servers (anyone looking for dedicated storage servers with excellent price per TB? or colocation ? )

Chia rush was not easy, the cost of the disks and JBODs went up by significant margin and never returned to pre Chai pricing . This forced us to tweak the offers a little bit so we can still get some profit out of them

This time we are adding approx 2PB of storage capacity :)

Not all offers can be posted here as some are outside pricing limit
The plans and all our special VPS offers are here
https://clients.servarica.com/store/special-offers-summer-2021

A ) Storage VPS DEALS

Not all Storage deals can be shown here check the link for full list
https://clients.servarica.com/store/special-offers-summer-2021

1- Polar Bear Storage Offer- 2021 (Annual) (limited)

2 CPU cores
3 GB RAM
2TB disk
Unlimited transfer on 100mbps or 4TB limit on 1gbps
1x IPv4
IPv6 available by request
72$/year

https://clients.servarica.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=476

B ) NVMe VPS DEALS

Again not all NVMe deals can be shown here check the link for full list
https://servarica.com/clients/store/special-group-2021

1- NVMe Cheetah (monthly - not limited)

4 CPU cores
6GB RAM
80GB NVme disk
Unlimited transfer on 100mbps or 4TB limit on 1gbps
1x IPv4
IPv6 available by request
7$/month

https://clients.servarica.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=408

C ) SSD Shared Hosting DEALS
Those offers are CPanel based with free .com/.org/.net/ca and others domains included

1- SSD PLUS (Annual) (limited)

25 GB SSD Storage 
1 free domain  **(the domain fees are non refundable)**
2 TB bandwidth
3 websites
unlimited subdomains
5 databases
20 email accounts
cPanel
PHP, Ruby, Python
Weekly backups
LVE Specifications
SPEED=200%
PMEM=3GB
VMEM=0
IO=10MB/s
IOPS=1024
NPROC=200
EP=200
35$/year

https://clients.servarica.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=471

2- Shared SSD 2 (limited)

50GB SSD Storage 
1 free domain with yearly payment **(the domain fees are non refundable)**
Domains 20
Subdomains Unlimited
FTP Accounts Unlimited
Databases 20
Email accounts 100
Unmetered Bandwidth
Free SSL
LVE Specifications
SPEED=200%
PMEM=3GB
VMEM=0
IO=10MB/s
IOPS=1024
NPROC=200
EP=200
6$/Month or 66$/year (yearly payment gets free domain)

https://clients.servarica.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=467

About Us
servaRICA is VPS provider located in Montreal, Canada. We own and operate our own network and we are not reseller to any other company. We have been in business since 2010 (more than 10 years ago) .

Location
Montreal , Quebec , Canada
Looking glass: https://ping.servarica.com

FAQ:
- Where can we find your Terms of Service/Legal documents:
TOS and AUP: https://servarica.com/terms-of-service/

  • What are your accepted payment methods: We accept Paypal, Alipay, Credit Cards and crypto currencies like (BTC , ETH etc)

  • What raid level you use for storage servers

  • All the offers you see here are based on raidz2 pools (some servers are pure SSD storage and some are normal disks storage)

  • Is there a limit on how much I can order from each plan?

  • yes for most storage offers we have a limit of 3 vps of same type per customer, if you need more please contact us

Node Specs
- 2x Intel Xeon (E5-2650 / E5-2650v2 / E5-2680v4) CPU or better
- 128GB RAM or more
- SAN Storage or local SSD/NVMe storage
- Raidz2
- 20Gbps uplink

Please let us know what you think

Thanks
Hani

Thanked by (2)bdl Ganonk

Comments

  • @servarica_hani said: Finally after the big move to our own private datacenter suit , we have more room for expansion.

    Congratulations! The move was the only outage had with @servarica_hani, I think, so I can definitely recommend them!

    Thanked by (1)servarica_hani

    dnscry.pt - Public DNSCrypt resolvers hosted by LowEnd providers • Need a free NAT LXC? -> https://microlxc.net/

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Hosting ProviderOG

    @Brueggus said:

    @servarica_hani said: Finally after the big move to our own private datacenter suit , we have more room for expansion.

    Congratulations! The move was the only outage had with @servarica_hani, I think, so I can definitely recommend them!

    Thanks, appreciate the recommendation
    We usually suffer from lack of reviews as we never ask for them so it is really rare when someone review or recommend us :)

  • Heh, conveniently located for backing up my BHS Kimsufi ;). I'm potentially interested in a dedi but competing with OVH sounds hard..

  • Congrats on the new suite. :)

    Adding another recommendation. I have a Mouse storage server with them from a 2019 BF offer that's still rolling along very well. I've been using it as a backup box and Minio bucket. In the entire time, it had 1 uplink network outage in January and compensation was offered for the downtime.

    Obligatory bench below. Note that the Mouse was regular HDD and ipv6-based, so not necessarily reflective of the newer plans and hardware, but it might give people a sense of disk and network over time.

    There aren't as many Canadian locations/providers at LE pricing range, and it's nice to see more decent providers in this space.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-06-05                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri Aug 27 12:26:18 EDT 2021
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5670  @ 2.93GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2933.510 MHz
    AES-NI     : ❌ Disabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 974.1 MiB
    Swap       : 191.0 MiB
    Disk       : 491.9 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 20.70 MB/s    (5.1k) | 117.99 MB/s   (1.8k)
    Write      | 20.71 MB/s    (5.1k) | 118.61 MB/s   (1.8k)
    Total      | 41.42 MB/s   (10.3k) | 236.60 MB/s   (3.6k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 136.83 MB/s    (267) | 132.53 MB/s    (129)
    Write      | 144.10 MB/s    (281) | 141.35 MB/s    (138)
    Total      | 280.93 MB/s    (548) | 273.88 MB/s    (267)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 71.2 Mbits/sec  | 94.4 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 67.3 Mbits/sec  | 94.3 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 57.4 Mbits/sec  | 94.4 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 98.7 Mbits/sec  | 96.1 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 36.1 Mbits/sec  | 93.6 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 343
    Multi Core      | 342
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/9537629
    
    Thanked by (1)skorous
  • I'd be happy with an ipv6-only server if it saved the cost of an ipv4 address.

  • FalzoFalzo Senpai
    edited August 2021

    polarbear storage from last BF, pushing nightly backups to it so today logged in after quite some time to check and actually run a bench to post and recommend your services @servarica_hani because performance is decent and stable.

    sadly just now iowait is through the roof. fio looks not so bad, no idea if network is saturated (iperf is a mixed bag) to cause this or a combination :/ afaik the storage is somewhat SAN?

    maybe it's because of the new offers and people putting it to use already. will monitor if I see an impact on the time the backup process usually takes ;-)

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-06-05                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fr 27. Aug 18:57:55 CEST 2021
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2593.560 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 488.0 MiB
    Disk       : 1.9 TiB
    
    Generating fio test file...
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 29.92 MB/s    (7.4k) | 192.92 MB/s   (3.0k)
    Write      | 29.93 MB/s    (7.4k) | 193.93 MB/s   (3.0k)
    Total      | 59.85 MB/s   (14.9k) | 386.85 MB/s   (6.0k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 221.61 MB/s    (432) | 216.37 MB/s    (211)
    Write      | 233.39 MB/s    (455) | 230.78 MB/s    (225)
    Total      | 455.01 MB/s    (887) | 447.15 MB/s    (436)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 64.8 Mbits/sec  | 1.94 Gbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | 943 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | busy            | 412 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | busy            | busy           
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 274 Mbits/sec   | 5.04 Gbits/sec 
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 3.13 Gbits/sec 
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 212 Mbits/sec   | 1.66 Gbits/sec 
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 349 Mbits/sec   | 951 Mbits/sec  
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 494                           
    Multi Core      | 918                           
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/9538227
    
  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Hosting ProviderOG

    @willie said:
    I'd be happy with an ipv6-only server if it saved the cost of an ipv4 address.

    We are planning on that , but we need some work on our IPv6 network to make the offers as usable as IPv4
    The list of stuff that has to be done is not small but once done IPv6 will be as usable as IPv4

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Hosting ProviderOG

    @willie said:
    Heh, conveniently located for backing up my BHS Kimsufi ;). I'm potentially interested in a dedi but competing with OVH sounds hard..

    It should be cheaper price per TB/month than OVH
    but it is not so low end , the server will be in 80$ range , but it will have enough TBs to make it good deal

  • Cool, and I'm not too worried about features of the ipv6 network, as long as I can back up a BHS Kimsufi to it. The huge server sounds like a good deal too, but I'm unfortunately not yet ready for anything like that.

  • @servarica_hani said:

    @willie said:
    I'd be happy with an ipv6-only server if it saved the cost of an ipv4 address.

    We are planning on that , but we need some work on our IPv6 network to make the offers as usable as IPv4

    With that in mind is there any update on reinstating the upstream IPv6 connectivity with Hurricane Electric / Google at the new datacentre?

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Hosting ProviderOG

    @cochon said:

    @servarica_hani said:

    @willie said:
    I'd be happy with an ipv6-only server if it saved the cost of an ipv4 address.

    We are planning on that , but we need some work on our IPv6 network to make the offers as usable as IPv4

    With that in mind is there any update on reinstating the upstream IPv6 connectivity with Hurricane Electric / Google at the new datacentre?

    Last week I was having daily calls with the other uplink provider in order to fix the issue on their side and they are still working on it
    Monday will escalate hopefully will get it fixed

    Thanked by (1)cochon
  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Hosting ProviderOG

    OK we decided to add another limited stock plan (depend on the acceptance level will decide to restock it or not)

    Killer Whale Storage offer (Annual) (limited)

    2 Shared CPU cores
    2 GB RAM
    3.5TB disk
    Unlimited transfer on 100mbps or 4TB limit on 1gbps
    1x IPv4
    IPv6 available free by request
    

    https://clients.servarica.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=480

    This is limited to 2x max per customer

    Thanks

  • @servarica_hani said:
    OK we decided to add another limited stock plan (depend on the acceptance level will decide to restock it or not)


    Killer Whale Storage offer (Annual) (limited)

    2 Shared CPU cores
    2 GB RAM
    3.5TB disk
    Unlimited transfer on 100mbps or 4TB limit on 1gbps
    1x IPv4
    IPv6 available free by request
    

    https://clients.servarica.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=480

    This is limited to 2x max per customer

    Thanks

    but but but...

    Thanked by (1)servarica_hani
  • Four words: W H O A.

    Thanked by (1)servarica_hani
  • What are the raid levels of these storage plans, if any?

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Hosting ProviderOG

    @willie said:
    What are the raid levels of these storage plans, if any?

    All storage offers are on ZFS Raidz2

    Thanked by (3)Falzo cybertech VPN
  • @servarica_hani said:

    @willie said:
    Heh, conveniently located for backing up my BHS Kimsufi ;). I'm potentially interested in a dedi but competing with OVH sounds hard..

    It should be cheaper price per TB/month than OVH
    but it is not so low end , the server will be in 80$ range , but it will have enough TBs to make it good deal

    Looking forward for a dedi from you guys!

  • @servarica_hani said:

    @cochon said:

    @servarica_hani said:

    @willie said:
    I'd be happy with an ipv6-only server if it saved the cost of an ipv4 address.

    We are planning on that , but we need some work on our IPv6 network to make the offers as usable as IPv4

    With that in mind is there any update on reinstating the upstream IPv6 connectivity with Hurricane Electric / Google at the new datacentre?

    Last week I was having daily calls with the other uplink provider in order to fix the issue on their side and they are still working on it
    Monday will escalate hopefully will get it fixed

    Uuuuh... something's happening: https://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_detail/lg01/ipv6?q=2602:ffd5::/36

    $ ping6 -c 3 lg.he.net
    PING lg.he.net(2001:470:0:20b::2 (2001:470:0:20b::2)) 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 2001:470:0:20b::2 (2001:470:0:20b::2): icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=65.0 ms
    64 bytes from 2001:470:0:20b::2 (2001:470:0:20b::2): icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=65.0 ms
    64 bytes from 2001:470:0:20b::2 (2001:470:0:20b::2): icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=65.4 ms
    
    --- lg.he.net ping statistics ---
    3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2001ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 65.070/65.215/65.483/0.350 ms
    

    🎉

    Thanked by (1)cochon

    dnscry.pt - Public DNSCrypt resolvers hosted by LowEnd providers • Need a free NAT LXC? -> https://microlxc.net/

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Hosting ProviderOG

    @Brueggus said:

    @servarica_hani said:
    Last week I was having daily calls with the other uplink provider in order to fix the issue on their side and they are still working on it
    Monday will escalate hopefully will get it fixed

    Uuuuh... something's happening: https://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_detail/lg01/ipv6?q=2602:ffd5::/36

    $ ping6 -c 3 lg.he.net
    PING lg.he.net(2001:470:0:20b::2 (2001:470:0:20b::2)) 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 2001:470:0:20b::2 (2001:470:0:20b::2): icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=65.0 ms
    64 bytes from 2001:470:0:20b::2 (2001:470:0:20b::2): icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=65.0 ms
    64 bytes from 2001:470:0:20b::2 (2001:470:0:20b::2): icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=65.4 ms
    
    --- lg.he.net ping statistics ---
    3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2001ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 65.070/65.215/65.483/0.350 ms
    

    🎉

    yes they fixed it few hours ago although I am still waiting for their confirmation
    :)

    Thanked by (1)cochon
Sign In or Register to comment.