WebHorizon exits KVM NAT market

yoursunny

Dear push-up specialist,

KVM NAT Poland - WAW-K1 - Add your free dedicated IPs now!

As some of you might be aware, we stopped allowing new orders for KVM based NAT services a few months ago soon after launch due to unforeseen reasons.

These KVM based NAT services are now in the process of being converted into dedicated IP services.

All services will be assigned a new dedicated IPv4 & IPv6 subnet for FREE. Service pricing will remain the same.

Please create a ticket with the Support Department to get your new dedicated IPs assigned.

In case of no response before 26.09.2021 (Sunday), a new dedicated IPv4 & IPv6 will be assigned by us automatically.

We are continually trying to improve the service experience & apologize for any inconvenience if this might cause.

Please a ticket in case of additional queries.

WebHorizon Helpdesk

---

I have 1GB for $15/year because it was a preorder.
After adding IPv4, it would be a $33/year value,
But I feel sorry for wasting IPv4, because my apps can run fine with just a few ports.

CamoYoshi

Well, I guess that means you'll have more reason to put resources on it that would need a public facing IPv4 address, so I guess you just gotta step your game up! LOL.

I will say using a NAT service is nice for some semblance of anonymity if you only use the IPv4 address for outbound communication, or if you want an additional layer of separation from being completely public on the internet. Still doesn't beat a real hardware firewall solution, but at least it's something.

I would think running a NAT service would be cheaper and possibly easier than just giving everyone IPs but I can't speak from experience. Whatever the case I'm glad they're not hanging folks out to dry and providing a solution.

chocolateshirt

@CamoYoshi said:
I would think running a NAT service would be cheaper and possibly easier than just giving everyone IPs but I can't speak from experience. Whatever the case I'm glad they're not hanging folks out to dry and providing a solution.

I think this is achievable when your upstream is OVH

mikho

@CamoYoshi said:

I would think running a NAT service would be cheaper and possibly easier than just giving everyone IPs but I can't speak from experience.

Cheaper as in not having to pay for the IPv4, yes.
Easier, not always as you have to create an internal network and route traffic in a way that you wouldn't have to if you gave everyone public-facing ipv4.

@CamoYoshi said:
Whatever the case I'm glad they're not hanging folks out to dry and providing a solution.

The right way to go! on that

Abdullah

btw. nice eye-candy title @yoursunny , free SEO!

@CamoYoshi said:
I would think running a NAT service would be cheaper and possibly easier than just giving everyone IPs but I can't speak from experience. Whatever the case I'm glad they're not hanging folks out to dry and providing a solution.

from my perspective, nat is cheaper but not much popular for higher plans (1GB +) as one can get same service with dedicated IP at similar prices (..it's LE* forums after all). we're just doing unmanaged vps and a nat one at that.

So we keep it to OVZ7 based NAT, cheap & affordable small machines.
If one needs SmallKVM - we have IPv6 only plans starting 0.5GB
Also we don't use OVH