Neeed VPS in EU: 2C / 2G / 10GiB SSD / 800GiB HDD

edited April 5 in Requests

On the lookout for a tiny beefy VPS, with hybrid storage.
Not in a hurry (can wait till ~May 15th).

Desirableed specs at least:

  • KVM/VMw, no OVZ/LXD
  • 2 vCPU w/ AES-NI
  • 2 GB RAM
  • 10+ GiB SSD (20 GiB preferred) for an OS that kicks ars
  • 800~1000 GiB of spinning rust... with tolerable io please
  • 1 TiB at 100+ mbps per month (200mbps preferred)
  • no hard cutoff once bw exceeded (even 1mbps will do)
  • native IPv6 + some IPv4 connectivity (NAT's fine)
  • low delay (<25ms) to Paris' ping6.online.net, so likely in FR NL DE GB IT.

Budget 3€/month, annual payment ok. Can go a bit higher if extra perfs/perks.
Something along the lines of Servarica's Opossum2 plan... but in the Old World :p

Usage will be rather modest - nothing shady nor noisy: backend for some light web hosting/mirroring + infrequent cold data encrypted backup.

Comments

  • host_chost_c Hosting Provider
    Thanked by (1)Shot²

    Host-C - VPS Services Provider - AS211462

    "If there is no struggle there is no progress"

  • Thanks - had noticed your sweet offer... but a bit too far (>30ms) and above budget.
    (BTW the IPv6 of your lookingglass seems down.)

  • Thanked by (1)Shot²
  • Thanks for the tip. A bit too much/pricey ("trop beaucoup" ©) for my needs, but close
    I've checked hostbrr's "hybrid" line also - close but no cigar.

  • Budget is a bit low.
    Maybe try waiting for the upcoming HostBrr sale, @Labze mentioned on LET he'll be releasing hybrid storage then

    Thanked by (1)Shot²
  • host_chost_c Hosting Provider
    edited April 5

    @Shot² said: (BTW the IPv6 of your lookingglass seems down.)

    Fixed, "too much firewall will kill you" =)

    https://ping6.ping.pe/2a0d:8140:0:4::2

    Host-C - VPS Services Provider - AS211462

    "If there is no struggle there is no progress"

  • @sh97 said:
    Budget is a bit low.
    Maybe try waiting for the upcoming HostBrr sale, @Labze mentioned on LET he'll be releasing hybrid storage then

    Yep, I'm playing MrCheapo here, in the hope that some special/custom offers or extraordinary suggestions pop up.
    I take Servarica as reference (hell, $36/yr for 2C/2G/1T is neat) but I have to admit it was a bit on the low side performance-wise, that's why I'll also consider more expensive offers if still a good bargain.

    Thanked by (1)servarica_hani
  • @Shot² said:

    @sh97 said:
    Budget is a bit low.
    Maybe try waiting for the upcoming HostBrr sale, @Labze mentioned on LET he'll be releasing hybrid storage then

    Yep, I'm playing MrCheapo here, in the hope that some special/custom offers or extraordinary suggestions pop up.
    I take Servarica as reference (hell, $36/yr for 2C/2G/1T is neat) but I have to admit it was a bit on the low side performance-wise, that's why I'll also consider more expensive offers if still a good bargain.

    I see.
    If that's the case, best bang for buck remains host C.
    EUR 3 * 12 = EUR 36/yr

    For ~9 EUR extra, you get 4TB additional storage and a decent, not oversold CPU. Has 20GB NVMe boot too.

    Maybe after the RDS peering issues are solved, you'll have a better latency, I'm waiting for that fix too, ping is not the best to Asia.

    Thanked by (2)host_c servarica_hani
  • c1vhostingc1vhosting Hosting Provider

    @Shot² said:
    On the lookout for a tiny beefy VPS, with hybrid storage.
    Not in a hurry (can wait till ~May 15th).

    Desirableed specs at least:

    • KVM/VMw, no OVZ/LXD
    • 2 vCPU w/ AES-NI
    • 2 GB RAM
    • 10+ GiB SSD (20 GiB preferred) for an OS that kicks ars
    • 800~1000 GiB of spinning rust... with tolerable io please
    • 1 TiB at 100+ mbps per month (200mbps preferred)
    • no hard cutoff once bw exceeded (even 1mbps will do)
    • native IPv6 + some IPv4 connectivity (NAT's fine)
    • low delay (<25ms) to Paris' ping6.online.net, so likely in FR NL DE GB IT.

    Budget 3€/month, annual payment ok. Can go a bit higher if extra perfs/perks.
    Something along the lines of Servarica's Opossum2 plan... but in the Old World :p

    Usage will be rather modest - nothing shady nor noisy: backend for some light web hosting/mirroring + infrequent cold data encrypted backup.

    Hello!
    PING ping6.online.net(2001:bc8:0:1::49 (2001:bc8:0:1::49)) 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 2001:bc8:0:1::49 (2001:bc8:0:1::49): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=23.4 ms
    64 bytes from 2001:bc8:0:1::49 (2001:bc8:0:1::49): icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=23.3 ms
    64 bytes from 2001:bc8:0:1::49 (2001:bc8:0:1::49): icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=23.3 ms
    64 bytes from 2001:bc8:0:1::49 (2001:bc8:0:1::49): icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=23.3 ms
    ^C
    --- ping6.online.net ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3000ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.283/23.330/23.420/0.053 ms

    So, this is our best plan for you. Please note that we will suspend (stop) your VPS until next month if you overuse your bandwidth, so I entered one TB more than your request.

    2 vCore CPU, 4GB DDR4 ECC RAM, 20GB SSD NVMe PCIe, 1TB HDD SAS (single disk, limit at 100MB/s r/w and 100 iops), 2TB @ 200Mbps monthly traffic usage, 1 IPv4 address, 1 IPv6 address

    We can do this at €20/year VAT incl. or €3/month VAT incl.

    C1V hosting: Italy's Leading Data Center | Unbeatable VPS, Dedicated Servers, and Colocation | Cutting-Edge Facilities in Pomezia | Where Your Success Takes Center Stage.
    🚀 VPN for €5/year 🚀 | Follow us on Telegram

  • edited April 7

    I have storage vps with @host_c and it is excellent in performance and stability. The proper ticketing system is extremely helpful to get support in time.

    I personally avoid providers who do not have proper ticket based online support. Also check the cancellation policy as well before signing up

    Thanked by (3)Shot² cybertech host_c
  • edited April 7

    @dev_vps said:
    I have storage vps with @host_c and it is excellent in performance and stability. The proper ticketing system is extremely helpful to get support in time.

    I personally avoid providers who do not have proper ticket based online support. Also check the cancellation policy as well before signing up

    Yep, I'm wary of summerhosts and other too-good-to-be-true "funny" hosts (a recipe for LowEndlessDramas on the sister LowEndTrash forum, wink wink). They harvest gazilions of customers - including tons of noisy neighbours - thanks to cheap powerful plans shining in benchmarks... then after a few weeks quality goes to deep sh*t (iops, latency, bankruptcy, "of course it was all raid0", whatever...).

    As for @host_c, save for the fact they're newcomers and out-of-stock right now (and weird statements such as no DNS, XFS, qemu-guest-agent etc.), it looks tempting indeed, and definitely in my budget. Especially now that I can see that their IPv6 is roughly ~25ms only from here. :p

  • @Shot² said:

    @dev_vps said:
    I have storage vps with @host_c and it is excellent in performance and stability. The proper ticketing system is extremely helpful to get support in time.

    I personally avoid providers who do not have proper ticket based online support. Also check the cancellation policy as well before signing up

    As for @host_c, save for the fact they're newcomers and out-of-stock right now (and weird statements such as no DNS, XFS, qemu-guest-agent etc.), it looks tempting indeed, and definitely in my budget.
    Especially now that I can see that their IPv6 is roughly ~25ms only from here. :p

    I have been @host_c customer since Dec 2023, and recently upgraded my storage VPS.

    Thanked by (1)Shot²
  • edited April 7

    @Shot² said:

    @dev_vps said:
    I have storage vps with @host_c and it is excellent in performance and stability. The proper ticketing system is extremely helpful to get support in time.

    I personally avoid providers who do not have proper ticket based online support. Also check the cancellation policy as well before signing up

    ... then after a few weeks quality goes to deep sh*t (iops, latency, bankruptcy, "of course it was all raid0", whatever...).

    Compare these two GB6 scores from two providers
    same cpu and both "claim" with 2 vCores

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     |  821                           
    Multi Core      | 1421                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/4286356
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 292                        
    Multi Core      | 463                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5619685
    

    Avoid providers who won’t share GB6 score from their “busy node”

  • Went for a neat offer at @Labze's HostBrr - and it appears to kick a$$ so far

    /thread

Sign In or Register to comment.