[2022] ★ VirMach ★ RYZEN ★ NVMe ★★ The Epic Sales Offer Thread ★★

16263656768166

Comments

  • williewillie OG
    edited October 2022

    14 day burn-in

    I think the big providers qualify new hardware configs for months before opening them up to non-beta users. 14 day burn in is for new installs of hw configs that have already been qualified. It sounds like the hw issues in this thread came from configs that were flaky to begin with, so 14 days wouldn't be nearly enough of a burn-in.

    I certainly hope that all these emergencies resolve and things get near normal again. At that point it's worth doing some reflection to figure out what went wrong and how it can be prevented going forward. Postmortems are a usual procedure after any significant outage.

  • Well there's that.

    @jbiloh said:

    Because this host is clearly experiencing some challenging times we are going to remove the "Top Host" designation. Should they return to the community, and should the community vote them as a "Top Host" in a future provider poll they will be eligible to receive the honor again.

  • Using the VNC terminal I changed eth0 to ens3 and bam! it started working. However you will see that the SolusVM in the migration tool broke it.

    thanks

  • @skorous said:
    Well there's that.

    Yeah, well. The mods & admins there can't even admit they aren't neutral towards providers and play favourites / make situations worse for those they dislike. So it's not really a surprise they would take this step in my opinion.

    Totally no idea why hostile / biased / out right hostile admins & mods leads to a cess pool of a forum. goes to collect eyes from them rolling so hard

  • edited October 2022

    Our friend jbiloh removed Virmach's "Top Host" on the OGF, even though he said they are still talking internally on adding an expiry date for the "Top Host" tag.

    But hey, he claims he isn't singling out Virmach... And he wonders what possibly could be the reason Virmach doesn't post there anymore. What a joke.

    Edit: Ah I didn't go to page 107 before posting, looks like it was already mentioned lol.

  • AlwaysSkintAlwaysSkint OG RETIRED
    edited October 2022

    ^ Never mind, there will still be the incessant pseudo Pidgin English posted by mui. :/

    In stasis until the shitposting stops/abates.
    Than=compare;then=sequence:brought=bring;bought=buy:staffs=pile of sticks:informations/infos=no plural.
    It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away. || NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh).

  • Hi everyone, my VPS from SEAZ007 has seamless changed the IP, thanks Virmach!

  • @AlwaysSkint said:
    ^ Never mind, there will still be the incessant pseudo Pidgin English posted by mui. :/

    Yeah, the one that claims he dropped service cause it was taking too much time to do anything but posts paragraphs a day about it.. Must be worth his time somehow to do that.....

    I check a couple things there but avoid most threads, just irritates me for no good reason.

  • Because this host is clearly experiencing some challenging times we are going to remove the "Top Host" designation.

    This is bad optics for LET admins. The part that came before was reasonable:

    Virmach received "Top Host" designation after the community voted them as such many years ago. Internally we (admins and mods) have discussed this and will be making some changes so that such designations are not "for life" but expire after X years.

    I assume LET admins will remove the "Top Host" designations from all providers who have held it as long or longer as VirMach.

  • Fun YABS from my Los Angeles VM:

    Uptime     : 0 days, 15 hours, 27 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 3 @ 3693.062 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 9.0 GiB
    Swap       : 256.0 MiB
    Disk       : 24.3 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
    Kernel     : 5.10.0-17-amd64
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 403.23 MB/s (100.8k) | 2.11 GB/s    (33.0k)
    Write      | 404.29 MB/s (101.0k) | 2.12 GB/s    (33.1k)
    Total      | 807.52 MB/s (201.8k) | 4.23 GB/s    (66.1k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 3.57 GB/s     (6.9k) | 6.54 GB/s     (6.3k)
    Write      | 3.76 GB/s     (7.3k) | 6.98 GB/s     (6.8k)
    Total      | 7.34 GB/s    (14.3k) | 13.53 GB/s   (13.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                    |                           |                 |                
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 711 Mbits/sec   | 326 Mbits/sec  
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 790 Mbits/sec   | 358 Mbits/sec  
    Hybula          | The Netherlands (40G)     | 719 Mbits/sec   | 576 Mbits/sec  
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 45.7 Mbits/sec 
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 884 Mbits/sec   | 639 Mbits/sec  
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 899 Mbits/sec   | 611 Mbits/sec  
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 915 Mbits/sec   | 941 Mbits/sec  
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1253                          
    Multi Core      | 3178                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/17658717
    
  • @JDMcPea said:

    @VirMach said:
    I had a TLDR written for this but lost it. Basically I have an idea to let existing customers burn in new nodes we deploy so we find any issues we missed that may appear from "natural" usage. It's essentially a 14 day trial service of NVMe1G and it may otherwise go down or have issues, no support, guaranteed data loss. You can abuse it all you want though as long as you're not committing a crime (as in, high CPU or I/O is fine. But we can still suspend it if we want to, not that it matters.)

    https://billing.virmach.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=217

    Coupon code IUNDERSTANDWHATIMORDERING

    I got "You must have an active product/service to use this code" error when I applied the Promo code so it did not remove the setup fee. Was logged in to my account and I do have an active service

    Me too!

    Does this mean the node assignments were filled or just some issue with the site?

  • @AlwaysSkint said:
    ^Yup, I concur. I couldn't get netboot.xyz to play nicely, so booted Alama and flags are set.

    Just FYI, you can use netboot.xyz from grub pretty easily. Just follow these steps:

    apt update && apt install grub-imageboot
    
    mkdir /boot/images
    
    cd /boot/images
    
    wget https://boot.netboot.xyz/ipxe/netboot.xyz.iso
    
    update-grub2
    
    (if you're not quick, edit GRUB_TIMEOUT in /etc/default/grub to 30 or higher, run update-grub2 after editing)
    

    Then just reboot and select netboot from the boot menu (you'll need VNC access for this bit)

  • AlwaysSkintAlwaysSkint OG RETIRED
    edited October 2022

    @Daevien said: I check a couple things there but avoid most threads, just irritates me for no good reason.

    Precise. Absolut. :)

    @fluttershy said: Fun YABS from my Los Angeles VM:

    Now you do know that you don't really need that and I'll take it off your hands; find it a new home on the East Coast (or NL) where it won't get abused. ;)

    In stasis until the shitposting stops/abates.
    Than=compare;then=sequence:brought=bring;bought=buy:staffs=pile of sticks:informations/infos=no plural.
    It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away. || NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh).

  • @jtk said:
    I assume LET admins will remove the "Top Host" designations from all providers who have held it as long or longer as VirMach.

    Like ones with pending court cases about previous related companies that scammed their own userbase? Nah

  • @AlwaysSkint said:

    @fluttershy said: Fun YABS from my Los Angeles VM:

    Now you do know that you don't really need that and I'll take it off your hands; find it a new home on the East Coast (or NL) where it won't get abused. ;)

    I'll never give up my $25/year idler :angry: :lol:

  • FrankZFrankZ ModeratorOG
    edited October 2022

    jbiloh said:
    Virmach received "Top Host" designation after the community voted them as such many years ago.

    --

    LET Provider Poll 2021 - Results

    Best Providers
    Rank Provider Votes
    1 RackNerd - 132
    2 BuyVM / BuyShared - 63
    3 VirMach - 57

    So many years ago, way back in 2021

  • imokimok OG Not Administrator

    I have apple pie at home. I want it in the office.

  • imokimok OG Not Administrator

    There is strawberry jelly too.

  • @imok said:
    There is strawberry jelly too.

    You put strawberry jelly on apple pie?

  • @imok Can you PLEASE keep this inane stuff to Cest Pit and/or OGF? PLEASE!

    In stasis until the shitposting stops/abates.
    Than=compare;then=sequence:brought=bring;bought=buy:staffs=pile of sticks:informations/infos=no plural.
    It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away. || NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh).

  • @Virmach Perhaps you can ask the mods to create a forum post specifically for reporting issues with the NVMe alpha/beta test. Not much point in adding to your Ticket count, eh?

    In stasis until the shitposting stops/abates.
    Than=compare;then=sequence:brought=bring;bought=buy:staffs=pile of sticks:informations/infos=no plural.
    It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away. || NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh).

  • @atomi said:

    @VirMach said:

    @atomi said:

    @AlwaysSkint said:
    Gateway is pingable but Solus HTML5 VNC doesn't attach to node and VMS doesn't boot up (to netboot.xyz ISO).

    Same problem, I also noticed that client panel says AMSD030X but its RYZE.AMS-D001.VMS in Solus. I'm not sure if numbers should match but they usually do

    It just means I can't type. (edit) or think.

    I think it must the first one since that package has only 1GB of bandwidth. You cannot think anyone could proceed a normal testing with such a abnormal amount of data transfer :wink:

    This is a glitch that ModulesGarden was asked to fix for probably years and kept saying it's fixed and didn't fix it. Maybe they did fix it by now but I'm pretty sure we're on the latest version already. I'll fix it now, order another one in a few minutes.

  • I feel bad for grabbing one of the free instances, I'll probably just run archiveteam on it + yabs on cron or something.

  • @jtk said:

    @VirMach said:
    I had a TLDR written for this but lost it. Basically I have an idea to let existing customers burn in new nodes we deploy so we find any issues we missed that may appear from "natural" usage.

    Ordered with Debian 11. The order process was fine. Was provisioned an 1CPU, 1GB RAM, 25GB disk, 1GB traffic on a AMS node. Was marked as offline. Went into the control panel and tried to boot it. Nothing. Re-installed with Debian 11. Still not coming up. Tried Debian 10. Not still offline. Tried VNC, unreachable. Tried remote echo request (PING) to make sure it wasn't being misreported by control panel, no response. Tried CentOS 8, still not up. Tried a couple power offs, boots, and what not.

    Sounds like you should also order another one.

  • @lemoncube said:
    I have a tiny VPS on PHXZ004 idling all the time just triggered an email imforming me it was suspended due to bandwidth overuse. It was a BF flash deal plan and the bandwidth actually is as low as 125GB if I remember correctly so it could have fallen victim to some sort of attack and got it all burnt up ( or maybe the configuration messed up during migration or IP switching and I didn't pay attention ).
    I don't think I'm gonna appeal for it. It's just kinda infuriating not be able to inspect how or when it ran out of bandwidth as either whcms or solusvm won't allow me to see stats and graph at all when service isn't active.

    Yeah I agree with you there. We really need to consider using something else soon as our next big project but I'd rather just leave everything alone at this point. I feel like us and the customers alike have had a decade's worth of frustration from everything flying around this year.

    But pretty much every case is what you described, it might have gotten hacked. The only way to be nearly 100% secure is to use SSH key and disable VNC most the time but I understand that's not convenient for most people.

  • @VirMach said: I'll fix it now, order another one in a few minutes.

    Did you name this VM especially for me? :open_mouth:

    EnviousElderly-VM

    FYI: Still the discrepancy AMSD030X => RYZE.AMS-D001.VMS

    Bandwidth 1000 GB

    That's fixed! :) :+1:

    In stasis until the shitposting stops/abates.
    Than=compare;then=sequence:brought=bring;bought=buy:staffs=pile of sticks:informations/infos=no plural.
    It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away. || NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh).

  • @willie said:

    14 day burn-in

    I think the big providers qualify new hardware configs for months before opening them up to non-beta users. 14 day burn in is for new installs of hw configs that have already been qualified. It sounds like the hw issues in this thread came from configs that were flaky to begin with, so 14 days wouldn't be nearly enough of a burn-in.

    I certainly hope that all these emergencies resolve and things get near normal again. At that point it's worth doing some reflection to figure out what went wrong and how it can be prevented going forward. Postmortems are a usual procedure after any significant outage.

    SJCZ005 is coming back, it was about to come back this morning and then I got dragged into something else for several hours.

    We've definitely had way longer than months of testing for the configurations, but definitely not every single unit. They're all brand new parts and some just end up malfunctioning after people actually go on them. Based on our experience so far I think 2 weeks is pretty good. Most nodes didn't crash or have problems until we finally filled them, and the ones that did showed their problems relatively quickly. We do actually test everything though beforehand, it's just not the same. Like a node can do a stress test for several days and then once it gets the right combination of people actually using it or after a rough shipment it can still pass everything with flying colors and then go haywire once it has to actually boot up a bunch of VMs doing random things at random times.

    I don't know, I'll stop rambling I guess.

  • @AlwaysSkint said:
    FYI: Still the discrepancy AMSD030X => RYZE.AMS-D001.VMS

    Oh god my brain is actually melting, I could have sworn I fixed it but it's entirely possible I can no longer type 001 correctly.

  • @fluttershy said:
    I feel bad for grabbing one of the free instances, I'll probably just run archiveteam on it + yabs on cron or something.

    If it makes you feel any better this node has just been sitting there idle for ~3 months now.

  • @SeaScoot said:

    @JDMcPea said:

    @VirMach said:
    I had a TLDR written for this but lost it. Basically I have an idea to let existing customers burn in new nodes we deploy so we find any issues we missed that may appear from "natural" usage. It's essentially a 14 day trial service of NVMe1G and it may otherwise go down or have issues, no support, guaranteed data loss. You can abuse it all you want though as long as you're not committing a crime (as in, high CPU or I/O is fine. But we can still suspend it if we want to, not that it matters.)

    https://billing.virmach.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=217

    Coupon code IUNDERSTANDWHATIMORDERING

    I got "You must have an active product/service to use this code" error when I applied the Promo code so it did not remove the setup fee. Was logged in to my account and I do have an active service

    Me too!

    Does this mean the node assignments were filled or just some issue with the site?

    Some old WHMCS bug IIRC.

  • AlwaysSkintAlwaysSkint OG RETIRED
    edited October 2022

    @VirMach said: .. this node has just been sitting there idle for ~3 months now.

    Now just add a 2TB HDD or therabouts and we've got the making of a sweet 15GB NVme/150GB HDD hybrid. ;) Then unleash on the Tokyo suckers punters! :cold_sweat:

    In stasis until the shitposting stops/abates.
    Than=compare;then=sequence:brought=bring;bought=buy:staffs=pile of sticks:informations/infos=no plural.
    It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away. || NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh).

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King YABS 24/7/365

    oh yeah just gonna triple YABS it

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • AlwaysSkintAlwaysSkint OG RETIRED
    edited October 2022

    I'll have more of this, thanks..

    Mon 3 Oct 19:23:28 EDT 2022

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 7 minutes
    Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 1 @ 3693.062 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 804.7 MiB
    Swap : 256.0 MiB
    Disk : 24.3 GiB
    Distro : AlmaLinux 8.6 (Sky Tiger)
    Kernel : 4.18.0-372.26.1.el8_6.x86_64

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 351.17 MB/s (87.7k) 785.15 MB/s (12.2k)
    Write 352.09 MB/s (88.0k) 789.28 MB/s (12.3k)
    Total 703.26 MB/s (175.8k) 1.57 GB/s (24.6k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 1.02 GB/s (1.9k) 2.12 GB/s (2.0k)
    Write 1.07 GB/s (2.1k) 2.26 GB/s (2.2k)
    Total 2.09 GB/s (4.0k) 4.38 GB/s (4.2k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 939 Mbits/sec | 940 Mbits/sec
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 936 Mbits/sec | 936 Mbits/sec
    Hybula | The Netherlands (40G) | 941 Mbits/sec | 941 Mbits/sec
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 861 Mbits/sec | 459 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 876 Mbits/sec | 350 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 716 Mbits/sec | 178 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 795 Mbits/sec | 241 Mbits/sec

    Edit: Sorry, @yoursunny I haven't swotted up on IPv6, to enable a route but the vNIC appears to have one.

    In stasis until the shitposting stops/abates.
    Than=compare;then=sequence:brought=bring;bought=buy:staffs=pile of sticks:informations/infos=no plural.
    It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away. || NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh).

  • I am going to try obtaining multiple of them and create a Proxmox HA cluster, let's see how well it does

    This is acceptable use case for IO/CPU "abuse" right?

    食之无味 弃之可惜 - Too arduous to relish, too wasteful to discard.

  • Obligatory YABS

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2022-08-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon 03 Oct 2022 07:43:40 PM EDT
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 3 minutes
    Processor  : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 3693.062 MHz
    AES-NI     : ❌ Disabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 976.4 MiB
    Swap       : 256.0 MiB
    Disk       : 24.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
    Kernel     : 5.10.0-8-amd64
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 118.66 MB/s  (29.6k) | 16.06 MB/s     (251)
    Write      | 118.98 MB/s  (29.7k) | 16.62 MB/s     (259)
    Total      | 237.65 MB/s  (59.4k) | 32.69 MB/s     (510)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 127.02 MB/s    (248) | 669.60 MB/s    (653)
    Write      | 133.77 MB/s    (261) | 714.19 MB/s    (697)
    Total      | 260.79 MB/s    (509) | 1.38 GB/s     (1.3k)
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1063
    Multi Core      | 1063
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/17722131
    
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2022-08-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon 03 Oct 2022 07:43:40 PM EDT
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 3 minutes
    Processor  : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 3693.062 MHz
    AES-NI     : ❌ Disabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 976.4 MiB
    Swap       : 256.0 MiB
    Disk       : 24.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
    Kernel     : 5.10.0-8-amd64
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 120.15 MB/s  (30.0k) | 23.25 MB/s     (363)
    Write      | 120.47 MB/s  (30.1k) | 23.81 MB/s     (372)
    Total      | 240.62 MB/s  (60.1k) | 47.06 MB/s     (735)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 115.83 MB/s    (226) | 1.27 GB/s     (1.2k)
    Write      | 121.99 MB/s    (238) | 1.35 GB/s     (1.3k)
    Total      | 237.82 MB/s    (464) | 2.63 GB/s     (2.5k)
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1048
    Multi Core      | 1053
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/17722134
    
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2022-08-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon 03 Oct 2022 07:43:41 PM EDT
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 3 minutes
    Processor  : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 3693.062 MHz
    AES-NI     : ❌ Disabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 976.4 MiB
    Swap       : 256.0 MiB
    Disk       : 24.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
    Kernel     : 5.10.0-8-amd64
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 77.24 MB/s   (19.3k) | 20.02 MB/s     (312)
    Write      | 77.44 MB/s   (19.3k) | 20.60 MB/s     (321)
    Total      | 154.68 MB/s  (38.6k) | 40.63 MB/s     (633)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 735.64 MB/s   (1.4k) | 541.07 MB/s    (528)
    Write      | 774.72 MB/s   (1.5k) | 577.10 MB/s    (563)
    Total      | 1.51 GB/s     (2.9k) | 1.11 GB/s     (1.0k)
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1059
    Multi Core      | 1077
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/17722130
    
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2022-08-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon 03 Oct 2022 07:43:42 PM EDT
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 3 minutes
    Processor  : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 3693.062 MHz
    AES-NI     : ❌ Disabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 976.4 MiB
    Swap       : 256.0 MiB
    Disk       : 24.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
    Kernel     : 5.10.0-8-amd64
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 119.58 MB/s  (29.8k) | 21.96 MB/s     (343)
    Write      | 119.89 MB/s  (29.9k) | 22.53 MB/s     (352)
    Total      | 239.48 MB/s  (59.8k) | 44.50 MB/s     (695)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 182.18 MB/s    (355) | 937.87 MB/s    (915)
    Write      | 191.86 MB/s    (374) | 1.00 GB/s      (976)
    Total      | 374.05 MB/s    (729) | 1.93 GB/s     (1.8k)
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1054
    Multi Core      | 1060
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/17722133
    
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2022-08-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon 03 Oct 2022 07:43:43 PM EDT
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 3 minutes
    Processor  : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 3693.062 MHz
    AES-NI     : ❌ Disabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 976.4 MiB
    Swap       : 256.0 MiB
    Disk       : 24.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
    Kernel     : 5.10.0-8-amd64
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 80.23 MB/s   (20.0k) | 26.40 MB/s     (412)
    Write      | 80.44 MB/s   (20.1k) | 26.84 MB/s     (419)
    Total      | 160.67 MB/s  (40.1k) | 53.24 MB/s     (831)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 604.22 MB/s   (1.1k) | 894.08 MB/s    (873)
    Write      | 636.32 MB/s   (1.2k) | 953.62 MB/s    (931)
    Total      | 1.24 GB/s     (2.4k) | 1.84 GB/s     (1.8k)
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1064
    Multi Core      | 1063
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/17722136
    

    I have never done this before but my plan is setup VPN in one node, so others can connect to it and use that as the "external" IP address with the HA cluster setup

    食之无味 弃之可惜 - Too arduous to relish, too wasteful to discard.

  • FrankZFrankZ ModeratorOG
    edited October 2022

    @FAT32 Please install Alma8 Linux template first to get AES-NI, VM-x/AMD-V enabled. Then install Proxmox . :)

  • @VirMach said:

    @SeaScoot said:

    @JDMcPea said:

    @VirMach said:
    I had a TLDR written for this but lost it. Basically I have an idea to let existing customers burn in new nodes we deploy so we find any issues we missed that may appear from "natural" usage. It's essentially a 14 day trial service of NVMe1G and it may otherwise go down or have issues, no support, guaranteed data loss. You can abuse it all you want though as long as you're not committing a crime (as in, high CPU or I/O is fine. But we can still suspend it if we want to, not that it matters.)

    https://billing.virmach.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=217

    Coupon code IUNDERSTANDWHATIMORDERING

    I got "You must have an active product/service to use this code" error when I applied the Promo code so it did not remove the setup fee. Was logged in to my account and I do have an active service

    Me too!

    Does this mean the node assignments were filled or just some issue with the site?

    Some old WHMCS bug IIRC.

    I've tried switching browsers, adding "&promocode=IUNDERSTANDWHATIMORDERING" to the URL but still no joy.

    So is everyone else just paying the setup fee?

  • @FrankZ said:
    FAT32 Please install Alma8 Linux template first to get AES-NI, VM-x/AMD-V enabled. Then install Proxmox . :)

    Just realise all of them are in the same host node, probably defeat the purpose of HA :joy:

    食之无味 弃之可惜 - Too arduous to relish, too wasteful to discard.

  • FrankZFrankZ ModeratorOG
    edited October 2022

    @FAT32 said:

    @FrankZ said:
    FAT32 Please install Alma8 Linux template first to get AES-NI, VM-x/AMD-V enabled. Then install Proxmox . :)

    Just realise all of them are in the same host node, probably defeat the purpose of HA :joy:

    Well you could pretend you have HA. :grimace:
    (Always good to see you around.)


    YABS with IPv6 for @yoursunny

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    # Yet-Another-Bench-Script #
    # v2022-08-20 #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

    Mon Oct 3 19:32:56 CDT 2022

    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 5 minutes
    Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 1 @ 3693.062 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 964.7 MiB
    Swap : 4564.0 MiB
    Disk : 24.3 GiB
    Distro : AlmaLinux 8.6 (Sky Tiger)
    Kernel : 4.18.0-372.26.1.el8_6.x86_64

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 377.29 MB/s (94.3k) | 353.85 MB/s (5.5k)
    Write | 378.29 MB/s (94.5k) | 355.71 MB/s (5.5k)
    Total | 755.59 MB/s (188.8k) | 709.57 MB/s (11.0k)
    | |
    Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 791.81 MB/s (1.5k) | 2.13 GB/s (2.0k)
    Write | 833.88 MB/s (1.6k) | 2.28 GB/s (2.2k)
    Total | 1.62 GB/s (3.1k) | 4.41 GB/s (4.3k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 940 Mbits/sec | 940 Mbits/sec
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 937 Mbits/sec | 929 Mbits/sec
    Hybula | The Netherlands (40G) | 941 Mbits/sec | 941 Mbits/sec
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 822 Mbits/sec | 417 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 876 Mbits/sec | 378 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 813 Mbits/sec | 190 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 767 Mbits/sec | 219 Mbits/sec

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 743 Mbits/sec | 306 Mbits/sec
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | busy | 518 Mbits/sec
    Hybula | The Netherlands (40G) | 831 Mbits/sec | 833 Mbits/sec
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 752 Mbits/sec | 77.1 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 574 Mbits/sec | 87.9 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 311 Mbits/sec | 113 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 593 Mbits/sec | 85.1 Mbits/sec

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1385
    Multi Core | 1334


    To simulate real world client usage I have installed a VPN, a miner, H@H, and a small website. It is good that VirMach let us have so much swap RAM, I mean disk space.

  • @FrankZ said:
    Well you could pretend you have HA. :grimace:
    (Always good to see you around.)

    That's so nice of you, good to see you around too :) I have been focusing on work, relationship and family lately, dont really spend time on social much.

    With the recession coming, I am also trying to plan my investment as all of them has been performing really badly, might want to start cutting my expenses too

    食之无味 弃之可惜 - Too arduous to relish, too wasteful to discard.

  • @FAT32 said:
    I am going to try obtaining multiple of them and create a Proxmox HA cluster, let's see how well it does

    This is acceptable use case for IO/CPU "abuse" right?

    Yeah all good.

  • @AlwaysSkint said:
    FYI: Still the discrepancy AMSD030X => RYZE.AMS-D001.VMS

    Okay it's getting a little concerning now. I think I need some sleep.

    [root@SJCZ005 ~]# restart
    -bash: restart: command not found
    [root@SJCZ005 ~]# restart
    -bash: restart: command not found

  • @VirMach said: I think I need some sleep.

    Likewise. zzzz

    In stasis until the shitposting stops/abates.
    Than=compare;then=sequence:brought=bring;bought=buy:staffs=pile of sticks:informations/infos=no plural.
    It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away. || NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh).

  • edited October 2022

    Wow only 32 people on AMSD030. Someone post the link to HostLoc so we get some real stress testing and complaint tickets in 14 days.

    (Edit) That's a strategic jab at the end there.

  • @VirMach said:
    Wow only 32 people on AMSD030. Someone post the link to HostLoc so we get some real stress testing and complaint tickets in 14 days.

    (Edit) That's a strategic jab at the end there.

    I can always order 32 more free vms :wink:

  • @VirMach said:
    Wow only 32 people on AMSD030. Someone post the link to HostLoc so we get some real stress testing and complaint tickets in 14 days.

    (Edit) That's a strategic jab at the end there.

    Well I mean, i would order and run some abuse tests.. If I wasn't stuck in failed order state lol I have been preemptively banned from the server :p

  • @FAT32 said: might want to start cutting my expenses too

    VirMach plans are already recession-optimized :)

    Have you tried turning it off and on again?

  • @VirMach
    SEAZ002 was updated with new IP 47.87.193.xxx but not yet announced on BGP

  • lxmlxm
    edited October 2022

    hello
    @VirMach when PHXZ004 network wll be fixed ?

  • The node is currently locked
    maybe it is tyoc025/026
    already downed 3hours

This discussion has been closed.